Peretó Juli
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio, Universitat de València-CSIC), Universitat de València (Spain), C. Jose Beltran 2, 46980, Paterna, Spain.
J Mol Evol. 2016 Dec;83(5-6):176-183. doi: 10.1007/s00239-016-9774-4. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
Synthetic Biology is currently presented as an emergent field involving the application of engineering principles to living matter. However, the scientific pursuit of making life in a laboratory is not new and has been the ultimate, if somewhat distant, aim of the origin-of-life research program for many years. Actually, over a century ago, the idea that the synthesis of life was indispensable to fully understand its nature already appealed to material scientists and evolutionists alike. Jacques Loeb proposed a research program from an engineering standpoint, following a synthetic method (experimental abiogenesis) and based on his mechanist vision of living beings, which he considered true chemical machines. Early synthetic biology endeavors, such as the premature experiments by Alfonso L. Herrera in Mexico, Stéphane Leduc in France, and John B. Burke in United Kingdom, were easily ridiculed on both scientific and ideological grounds. However, in retrospect, all those attempts should be considered as legitimate and sincere anti-vitalistic efforts to cross the apparent border between inert and living matter.
合成生物学目前被视为一个新兴领域,涉及将工程原理应用于生物。然而,在实验室中创造生命的科学追求并非新鲜事,多年来一直是生命起源研究项目的最终目标,尽管这个目标有点遥远。实际上,一个多世纪前,合成生命对于全面理解生命本质不可或缺的观点就已经吸引了材料科学家和进化论者。雅克·洛布从工程学角度提出了一个研究项目,采用合成方法(实验性自然发生说),并基于他对生物的机械论观点,他认为生物是真正的化学机器。早期的合成生物学尝试,比如墨西哥的阿方索·L·埃雷拉、法国的斯特凡纳·勒迪克和英国的约翰·B·伯克所进行的不成熟实验,很容易在科学和意识形态层面遭到嘲笑。然而,回顾起来,所有这些尝试都应被视为跨越惰性物质和生物之间明显界限的合理且真诚的反活力论努力。