• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喂食:对患者和照料者意味着什么,以及这些观点如何影响新加坡华裔照料者在生命末期继续喂食的决定。

Feeding: what it means to patients and caregivers and how these views influence Singaporean Chinese caregivers' decisions to continue feeding at the end of life.

作者信息

Chai Hui Zhong, Krishna Lalit Kumar Radha, Wong Victoria Hwei May

机构信息

1Department of Internal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014 Mar;31(2):166-71. doi: 10.1177/1049909113480883. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1177/1049909113480883
PMID:23503566
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The decision-making process underlying caregivers' choice to continue feeding at the end of life is not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a better understanding of the complex interplay of factors that influence the decision by caregivers to continue feeding.

METHODS

Palliative care patients and their main caregiver recruited at National Cancer Centre Singapore between May and July 2011 were included. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

One hundred respondents were included. Three major prevailing themes were identified: filial piety, source of hope, and expression of affection. Nonparametric statistical testing showed that patients and caregivers shared similar views about feeding at the end of life.

DISCUSSION

The major themes identified above undergird the caregiver's decision to continue feeding at the end of life.

摘要

引言

护理人员在生命末期选择继续喂食背后的决策过程尚未得到充分理解。

目的

更好地理解影响护理人员决定继续喂食的复杂因素相互作用。

方法

纳入2011年5月至7月在新加坡国立癌症中心招募的姑息治疗患者及其主要护理人员。使用访谈式问卷收集数据。

结果

纳入了100名受访者。确定了三个主要的普遍主题:孝道、希望来源和情感表达。非参数统计测试表明,患者和护理人员对生命末期的喂食持有相似观点。

讨论

上述主要主题支撑着护理人员在生命末期决定继续喂食。

相似文献

1
Feeding: what it means to patients and caregivers and how these views influence Singaporean Chinese caregivers' decisions to continue feeding at the end of life.喂食:对患者和照料者意味着什么,以及这些观点如何影响新加坡华裔照料者在生命末期继续喂食的决定。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014 Mar;31(2):166-71. doi: 10.1177/1049909113480883. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
2
Caregivers of advanced cancer patients: feelings of hopelessness and depression.晚期癌症患者的照顾者:绝望与抑郁情绪
Cancer Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct;30(5):412-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000290807.84076.73.
3
End-of-life care of elderly patients with dementia: A cross-sectional study of family carer decision-making.老年痴呆症患者的临终关怀:对家庭照顾者决策的横断面研究。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Mar-Apr;75:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
4
Does the cancer patient's disease stage matter? A comparative study of caregivers' mental health and health related quality of life.癌症患者的疾病分期重要吗?对照顾者心理健康和健康相关生活质量的比较研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2012 Sep;10(3):189-96. doi: 10.1017/S1478951511000873. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
5
Caregiver resilience in palliative care: a research protocol.姑息治疗中照护者的复原力:一项研究方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Feb;72(2):421-33. doi: 10.1111/jan.12829. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
6
Psychometric testing of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer on a Taiwanese family caregiver sample.针对台湾家庭照顾者样本进行照顾者生活质量指数-癌症的心理测量测试。
Cancer Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;32(3):220-9. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31819b5ae8.
7
The development and validation of a novel questionnaire to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care: the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire.开发和验证一种新的问卷,以衡量患者和家属对临终关怀的满意度:加拿大医疗保健评估项目(CANHELP)问卷。
Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;24(7):682-95. doi: 10.1177/0269216310373168. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
8
The influence of the family in conceptions of personhood in the palliative care setting in Singapore and its influence upon decision making.家庭对新加坡姑息治疗环境中人格观念的影响及其对决策的影响。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014 Sep;31(6):645-54. doi: 10.1177/1049909113500136. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
9
Family Caregivers' Pain Management in End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review.临终关怀中家庭照顾者的疼痛管理:一项系统综述。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jun;34(5):470-485. doi: 10.1177/1049909116637359. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
10
Hidden morbidity in cancer: spouse caregivers.癌症中的隐性发病情况:配偶照料者
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 20;25(30):4829-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0909.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of death and dying on surgeons in a tertiary cancer centre in Singapore.死亡与濒死对新加坡一家三级癌症中心外科医生的影响。
BMC Surg. 2025 May 5;25(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02881-1.
2
Caring for terminally Ill patients: the impact on oncologists.关怀终末期患者:对肿瘤学家的影响。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Sep 28;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01562-9.
3
Sustaining Joy in Serious Neurologic Illnesses.在严重神经系统疾病中保持快乐。
Semin Neurol. 2024 Oct;44(5):551-558. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788725. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
4
The role of patients' stories in medicine: a systematic scoping review.患者故事在医学中的作用:系统范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Dec 12;22(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01319-w.
5
Evidence-guided approach to portfolio-guided teaching and assessing communications, ethics and professionalism for medical students and physicians: a systematic scoping review.循证方法在医学生和医生的沟通、伦理和专业精神的课程设置和评估中的应用:系统的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e067048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067048.
6
Chinese American Caregivers' Attitudes Toward Tube Feeding for Persons with Dementia - USA, 2021-2022.美籍华裔照顾者对痴呆症患者鼻饲的态度——美国,2021 - 2022年
China CDC Wkly. 2022 Nov 25;4(47):1051-1054. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2022.211.
7
Systematic scoping review on moral distress among physicians.系统范围综述医生的道德困境。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 2;12(9):e064029. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064029.
8
A systematic scoping review on patients' perceptions of dignity.系统评价患者尊严感的研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 4;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01004-4.
9
Development and Validation of Filial Piety Representations at Parents' End of Life Scale.《父母临终时孝道表现量表的编制与验证》
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 6;10(6):1054. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061054.
10
A systematic scoping review moral distress amongst medical students.系统范围综述医学学生的道德困境。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03515-3.