Barr Ashley B, Simons Ronald L, Stewart Eric A
Department of Sociology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602,
Pers Relatsh. 2013 Mar 1;20(1):84-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01398.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
Since its publication, Elijah Anderson's (1999) code of the street thesis has found support in studies connecting disadvantage to the internalization of street-oriented values and an associated lifestyle of violent/deviant behavior. This primary emphasis on deviance in public arenas has precluded researchers from examining the implications of the code of the street for less public arenas, like intimate relationships. In an effort to understand if and how the endorsement of the street code may infiltrate such relationships, the present study examines the associations between the code of the street and relationship satisfaction and commitment among young adults involved in heterosexual romantic relationships. Using a dyadic approach, we find that street code orientation, in general, negatively predicts satisfaction and commitment, in part due to increased relationship hostility/conflict associated with the internalization of the code. Gender differences in these associations are considered and discussed at length.
自伊莱贾·安德森(Elijah Anderson)1999年提出“街头规范”理论以来,在将劣势与以街头为导向的价值观内化以及与之相关的暴力/越轨行为生活方式联系起来的研究中,该理论得到了支持。对公共领域越轨行为的这种主要关注使研究人员无法考察“街头规范”对诸如亲密关系等较少公共领域的影响。为了了解对街头规范的认可是否以及如何渗透到此类关系中,本研究考察了“街头规范”与参与异性恋浪漫关系的年轻人的关系满意度和承诺之间的关联。采用二元分析方法,我们发现,总体而言,街头规范取向对满意度和承诺具有负面预测作用,部分原因是与该规范内化相关的关系敌意/冲突增加。我们对这些关联中的性别差异进行了充分的考量和讨论。