Department of Anesthesia, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;60(6):528-38. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9916-8. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
In 2007, the World Health Organization created a Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) that encompassed a simple set of surgical safety standards. The threefold purpose of this study was to add ambulatory-specific items to the SSC, to introduce the items into an ambulatory surgical facility, and to determine if patient outcomes regarding postoperative pain and nausea/vomiting improved following implementation. In addition, safety attitudes, antibiotic timing, regional anesthesia/nerve blocks, preemptive pain medications, prophylactic antiemetics, length of stay, and hospital admission were also assessed.
After Research Ethics Board approval, staff complete a Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Seven items were added to the SSC. Data were then collected on 180 surgical cases before SSC implementation and 195 cases following implementation. Compliance with each section of the SSC was assessed.
On postoperative day one, the median (97.5% confidence interval [CI]) difference between pre- and post-implementation pain scores was 0.5 (97.5% CI, 0 to 1; P = 0.13), and the median difference in the rate of post-discharge nausea/vomiting was -8.4% (97.5% CI, -17.9 to 1.1; P = 0.06). There was no improvement in safety attitudes or any of the secondary outcomes, with the exception of the use of preemptive pain medications. Compliance with the three sections of the checklist, i.e., briefing, time out, and debriefing was 99.49%, 97.95%, and 96.92%, respectively. There was low compliance in verbalization of the added "ambulatory-specific items".
Potential reasons for lack of uptake and integration include poor "user" buy-in, an overly lengthy checklist, and lack of prioritization of ambulatory-specific items. A shortened SSC was developed based on the results of this study. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00934310.
2007 年,世界卫生组织制定了涵盖一系列简单的外科安全标准的外科安全检查表(SSC)。本研究的三重目的是向 SSC 添加特定于门诊的项目,将这些项目引入门诊手术设施,并确定实施后患者术后疼痛和恶心/呕吐的改善情况。此外,还评估了安全态度、抗生素时机、区域麻醉/神经阻滞、预防性镇痛药物、预防性止吐药、住院时间和住院入院情况。
在获得研究伦理委员会批准后,工作人员完成安全态度问卷调查。向 SSC 添加了七个项目。然后在 SSC 实施前收集了 180 例手术病例的数据,并在实施后收集了 195 例病例的数据。评估了 SSC 每个部分的合规性。
术后第一天,实施前后疼痛评分的中位数(97.5%置信区间[CI])差异为 0.5(97.5%CI,0 至 1;P=0.13),出院后恶心/呕吐发生率的中位数差异为-8.4%(97.5%CI,-17.9 至 1.1;P=0.06)。安全态度或任何次要结果均无改善,除了预防性镇痛药物的使用。检查表的三个部分(简介、停工期和回顾)的合规率分别为 99.49%、97.95%和 96.92%。对添加的“门诊特定项目”进行口头说明的合规率较低。
缺乏采用和整合的潜在原因包括“用户”购买意愿低、检查表过长以及对门诊特定项目缺乏优先级排序。根据本研究的结果开发了一个简化的 SSC。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,ID:NCT00934310。