Cardiosurgical Intensive Care Unit, Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland.
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2013 Mar 1;11(2):187-95.
Septic shock is characterized by circulatory compromise, microcirculatory alterations and mitochondrial damage, which all reduce cellular energy production. In order to reduce the risk of major cell death and a diminished likelihood of recovery, adaptive changes appear to be activated. As a result, cells and organs may survive in a non-functioning hibernation-like condition. Sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction may represent an example of such functional shutdown. Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction is common, corresponds to the severity of sepsis, and is reversible in survivors. Its mechanisms include the attenuation of the adrenergic response at the cardiomyocyte level, alterations of intracellular calcium trafficking and blunted calcium sensitivity of contractile proteins. All these changes are mediated by cytokines. Treatment includes preload optimization with sufficient fluids. However, excessive volume loading is harmful. The first line vasopressor recommended at present is norepinephrine, while vasopressin can be started as a salvage therapy for those not responding to catecholamines. During early sepsis, cardiac output can be increased by dobutamine. While early administration of catecholamines might be necessary to restore adequate organ perfusion, prolonged administration might be harmful. Novel therapies for sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction are discussed in this article. Cardiac inotropy can be increased by levosimendan, istaroxime or omecamtiv mecarbil without greatly increasing cellular oxygen demands. Heart rate reduction with ivabradine reduces myocardial oxygen expenditure and ameliorates diastolic filling. Beta-blockers additionally reduce local and systemic inflammation. Advances may also come from metabolic interventions such as pyruvate, succinate or high dose insulin substitutions. All these potentially advantageous concepts require rigorous testing before implementation in routine clinical practice.
感染性休克的特征是循环功能障碍、微循环改变和线粒体损伤,所有这些都会降低细胞的能量产生。为了降低主要细胞死亡的风险和降低恢复的可能性,适应性变化似乎被激活。结果,细胞和器官可能会在非功能的类似冬眠的状态下存活。感染性休克引起的心脏功能障碍可能就是这种功能关闭的一个例子。感染性休克引起的心肌功能障碍很常见,与感染性休克的严重程度相对应,在幸存者中是可逆的。其机制包括在心肌细胞水平上肾上腺素能反应的减弱、细胞内钙转运的改变以及收缩蛋白钙敏感性的降低。所有这些变化都是由细胞因子介导的。治疗包括用足够的液体优化前负荷。然而,过度的容量负荷是有害的。目前推荐的一线升压药是去甲肾上腺素,而对于对儿茶酚胺无反应的患者,可以开始使用血管加压素作为挽救治疗。在早期感染性休克中,多巴酚丁胺可增加心输出量。虽然早期给予儿茶酚胺可能是恢复足够器官灌注所必需的,但长期给予可能是有害的。本文讨论了感染性休克引起的心脏功能障碍的新疗法。左西孟旦、伊伐布雷定或 omecamtiv mecarbil 可增加心肌收缩力,而不会大大增加细胞的氧需求。静脉注射伊伐布雷定降低心率可减少心肌耗氧量并改善舒张充盈。β受体阻滞剂还可减少局部和全身炎症。代谢干预也可能取得进展,如丙酮酸、琥珀酸或高剂量胰岛素替代。所有这些潜在的有利概念都需要在常规临床实践中实施之前进行严格的测试。