Department of School and Counseling Psychology, Universityof Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.
J Couns Psychol. 2013 Apr;60(2):200-9. doi: 10.1037/a0032074. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
The present study used social cognitive career theory (SCCT; Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994) to predict the math/science goal intentions of a sample of low-income prospective first-generation college students (N = 305). Structural equation modeling was used to test a model depicting relationships between contextual (i.e., social class, learning experiences, proximal supports and barriers) and person-cognitive (i.e., self-efficacy, outcome expectations, interests, goals) variables as hypothesized in SCCT and based on previous literature on low-income first-generation college students. Results indicated that the hypothesized model provided the best representation of the data. All paths in the model were statistically significant, with the exceptions of paths from self-efficacy to goals, outcome expectations to interests, and perceived barriers to self-efficacy. Bootstrapping procedures revealed that the relationships between social class, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations were mediated through learning experiences. Furthermore, the relationship between social supports and goals was mediated by self-efficacy and interests and the relationships between self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and goals were mediated by interests. Contrary to hypotheses, the relationship between barriers and goals was not mediated by self-efficacy and interests. The hypothesis that proximal contextual supports and barriers would moderate the relationship between interests and goals was not supported. The final model explained 66% and 55% of the variance in math/science interests and goals, respectively. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
本研究运用社会认知职业理论(SCCT;Lent、Brown 和 Hackett,1994)来预测低收入、准第一代大学生(N=305)的数学/科学目标意向。结构方程模型被用来检验一个模型,该模型描绘了 SCCT 假设的情境(即社会阶层、学习经历、近端支持和障碍)和个体认知(即自我效能、结果预期、兴趣、目标)变量之间的关系,以及基于关于低收入第一代大学生的先前文献。结果表明,假设模型提供了数据的最佳表示。模型中的所有路径均具有统计学意义,除了自我效能与目标、结果预期与兴趣、以及感知障碍与自我效能之间的路径。自举程序显示,社会阶层、自我效能和结果预期之间的关系通过学习经历而中介。此外,社会支持与目标之间的关系通过自我效能和兴趣来中介,自我效能、结果预期和目标之间的关系通过兴趣来中介。与假设相反,障碍与目标之间的关系不受自我效能和兴趣的中介。兴趣和目标之间的近端情境支持和障碍是否会调节的假设不成立。最终模型分别解释了数学/科学兴趣和目标方差的 66%和 55%。讨论了对未来研究和实践的影响。