Di Patrizio Paolo, Blanchet Emmanuelle, Perret-Guillaume Christine, Benetos Athanase
Département de médicine, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-Les-Nancy, France, Médecine générale, Nancy, France, Service de gériatrie, CHU de Nancy, France.
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2013 Mar;11(1):21-31. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2013.0392.
the complexity of the elderly's cares justifies to set up tools of screening, diagnosis and follow-up of multiple pathologies. Numerous tests and scales were elaborated and validated, and are recommended by the Haute autorité de santé (HAS). Are these tools useful and are they adapted to the consultation of general medicine? What are the obstacles to their appropriation by the general practitioners?
to determine the frequency of use of a series of twelve tests and scales to geriatric aim by the general practitioners.
interests of these tests and obstacles to their use in practice.
transverse survey by mail way, with a representative sampling of general practitioners of Meurthe-et-Moselle concerning the use of 12 tests or scales validated.
84 general practitioners on 145 requested participated in the survey (rate of answers 58%). The most used tests are the MMSE, the AGGIR, the test of the clock and the test of five words of Dubois (respectively 48, 43, 38 and 36% of regular users). Thirty five percent of the general practitioners never use tests or scales, while 37% use them at least once a month. 85.5% of the trained practitioners use it more frequently. A practitioner on two (51%) considers that these tools are unsuitable for his practice while almost totality of the general practitioners (90%) admits an interest about these tools in the screening, the diagnosis and the follow-up of the geriatric pathologies. The obstacles are essentially connected to the very time-consuming character, to the absence of specific quotation and to the lack of training.
in the absence of tests and scales conceived by geriatricians and general practitioners, the existing tests although recognized useful are underused by the general practitioners of Meurthe-et-Moselle.
老年人护理的复杂性证明有必要建立多种病症的筛查、诊断和随访工具。已经制定并验证了许多测试和量表,法国卫生高级管理局(HAS)也推荐使用这些工具。这些工具是否有用,是否适用于全科医学咨询?全科医生采用这些工具的障碍是什么?
确定全科医生使用一系列十二种针对老年医学目的的测试和量表的频率。
这些测试的益处以及在实践中使用它们的障碍。
通过邮件进行横断面调查,对默尔特-摩泽尔省的全科医生进行代表性抽样,了解他们对12种经过验证的测试或量表的使用情况。
在145名被邀请的全科医生中,有84名参与了调查(回复率为58%)。使用最多的测试是简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、AGGIR、钟表测试和杜波依斯五个单词测试(经常使用者分别占48%、43%、38%和36%)。35%的全科医生从不使用测试或量表,而37%的医生至少每月使用一次。85.5%经过培训的医生更频繁地使用这些工具。五分之一的医生(51%)认为这些工具不适合他的实践,而几乎所有全科医生(90%)都承认这些工具对老年病症的筛查、诊断和随访有益。障碍主要与耗时、缺乏具体报价以及缺乏培训有关。
由于没有老年病医生和全科医生设计的测试和量表,默尔特-摩泽尔省的全科医生对现有虽被认为有用的测试使用不足。