• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improved outcomes in diabetes care for rural African Americans.改善农村非裔美国人的糖尿病护理结果。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):145-50. doi: 10.1370/afm.1470.
2
Confronting disparities in diabetes care: the clinical effectiveness of redesigning care management for minority patients in rural primary care practices.应对糖尿病护理中的差异:重新设计农村初级保健机构中少数族裔患者护理管理的临床效果
J Rural Health. 2005 Fall;21(4):317-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00101.x.
3
The Cholesterol, Hypertension, And Glucose Education (CHANGE) study: results from a randomized controlled trial in African Americans with diabetes.胆固醇、高血压和葡萄糖教育(CHANGE)研究:一项针对糖尿病非裔美国人的随机对照试验结果。
Am Heart J. 2013 Jul;166(1):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 17.
4
The impact of outpatient diabetes management on serum lipids in urban African-Americans with type 2 diabetes.门诊糖尿病管理对城市非裔美国2型糖尿病患者血脂的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2002 Jan;25(1):9-15. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.1.9.
5
Effectiveness of Technologically Enhanced Peer Support in Improving Glycemic Management Among Predominantly African American, Low-Income Adults With Diabetes.技术增强型同伴支持在改善以非裔美国人为主体、糖尿病低收入成年人血糖管理方面的效果。
Diabetes Educ. 2019 Jun;45(3):260-271. doi: 10.1177/0145721719844547. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
6
Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol Among Patients With Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial.印度一项针对伴发抑郁和糖尿病患者的随机临床试验(INDEPENDENT)表明,协同护理模式可改善抑郁症状及糖化血红蛋白、血压和血清胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):651-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11747.
7
Technology-Intensified Diabetes Education Study (TIDES) in African Americans with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对非裔美国2型糖尿病患者的技术强化糖尿病教育研究(TIDES):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Nov 25;15:460. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-460.
8
The effectiveness of peer health coaching in improving glycemic control among low-income patients with diabetes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.同伴健康教练在改善低收入糖尿病患者血糖控制方面的效果:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 1;11:208. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-208.
9
Impact of Distress Reduction on Behavioral Correlates and A1C in African American Women with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: Results from EMPOWER.减压对未控制 2 型糖尿病非裔美国女性行为相关因素和 A1C 的影响:EMPOWER 研究结果。
Ethn Dis. 2017 Apr 20;27(2):155-160. doi: 10.18865/ed.27.2.155. eCollection 2017 Spring.
10
Health coaching by medical assistants to improve control of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia in low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial.医学助理进行健康指导以改善低收入患者的糖尿病、高血压和高脂血症控制:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Mar;13(2):130-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1768.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of innovations that promote interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in primary care for older adults living with age-related chronic disease in rural areas.一项针对促进农村地区患有与年龄相关慢性病的老年人初级保健中跨专业协作(IPC)的创新举措的范围审查。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0331327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331327. eCollection 2025.
2
Interventions to improve primary healthcare in rural settings: A scoping review.农村地区改善初级卫生保健的干预措施:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0305516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305516. eCollection 2024.
3
Disparities in Diabetes Care: Differences Between Rural and Urban Patients Within a Large Health System.糖尿病护理中的差异:大型医疗体系中城乡患者之间的差异。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 May-Jun;21(3):234-239. doi: 10.1370/afm.2962.
4
Medical Nutrition Therapy Provided by Dietitians is Effective and Saves Healthcare Costs in the Management of Adults with Dyslipidemia.营养师提供的医学营养治疗在血脂异常成年人的管理中是有效的,可以节省医疗保健费用。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023 Jun;25(6):331-342. doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01096-0. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Do health education initiatives assist socioeconomically disadvantaged populations? A systematic review and meta-analyses.健康教育举措是否有助于社会经济处境不利人群?系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15329-z.
6
Assessment of Disparities in Diabetes Mortality in Adults in US Rural vs Nonrural Counties, 1999-2018.美国农村与非农村县成年人糖尿病死亡率差异评估,1999-2018 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232318. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32318.
7
Effects of Exercise and Diet on Body Composition and Physical Function in Older Hispanics with Type 2 Diabetes.运动和饮食对 2 型糖尿病老年西班牙裔人体成分和身体功能的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;18(15):8019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158019.
8
Assessment of Interprofessional Collaborative Practices and Outcomes in Adults With Diabetes and Hypertension in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估初级保健中糖尿病和高血压成人的跨专业协作实践和结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036725. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36725.
9
Financial Incentives and Nurse Coaching to Enhance Diabetes Outcomes (FINANCE-DM): a trial protocol.财务激励和护士辅导以改善糖尿病结局(FINANCE-DM):一项试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 22;10(12):e043760. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043760.
10
The Effectiveness of Patient-Centred Medical Home-Based Models of Care versus Standard Primary Care in Chronic Disease Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials.以患者为中心的医疗之家模式与标准初级保健在慢性病管理中的效果比较:随机和非随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 21;17(18):6886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186886.

本文引用的文献

1
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2011 年》
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc11-S011.
2
Effectiveness of disease-management programs for improving diabetes care: a meta-analysis.疾病管理方案在改善糖尿病护理方面的效果:一项荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2011 Feb 8;183(2):E115-27. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091786. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
3
Initial lessons from the first national demonstration project on practice transformation to a patient-centered medical home.首个全国性实践转型为以患者为中心的医疗之家示范项目的初步经验教训。
Ann Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun;7(3):254-60. doi: 10.1370/afm.1002.
4
Family physicians as team leaders: "time" to share the care.家庭医生作为团队领导者:是时候分担护理工作了。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Apr;6(2):A59. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
5
Racial and ethnic differences in mean plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol in over 2000 patients with type 2 diabetes.2000多名2型糖尿病患者的平均血糖、糖化血红蛋白和1,5-脱水葡萄糖醇的种族和民族差异。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 May;94(5):1689-94. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1940. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
6
10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病强化血糖控制的10年随访
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1577-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
7
Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes.多因素干预对2型糖尿病患者死亡率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 7;358(6):580-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706245.
8
Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin.相互冲突的需求或临床惰性:糖化血红蛋白升高的案例
Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):196-201. doi: 10.1370/afm.679.
9
Differences in A1C by race and ethnicity among patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the Diabetes Prevention Program.糖尿病预防计划中糖耐量受损患者的糖化血红蛋白(A1C)在种族和族裔间的差异。
Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct;30(10):2453-7. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2003. Epub 2007 May 29.
10
Disparities in HbA1c levels between African-American and non-Hispanic white adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis.非裔美国糖尿病成年人与非西班牙裔白人糖尿病成年人之间糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的差异:一项荟萃分析。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Sep;29(9):2130-6. doi: 10.2337/dc05-1973.

改善农村非裔美国人的糖尿病护理结果。

Improved outcomes in diabetes care for rural African Americans.

机构信息

Vidant Health (formerly University Health System), Greenville, NC 27834, USA.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):145-50. doi: 10.1370/afm.1470.

DOI:10.1370/afm.1470
PMID:23508601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3601402/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Rural low-income African American patients with diabetes have traditionally poorer clinical outcomes and limited access to state-of-the-art diabetes care. We determined the effectiveness of a redesigned primary care model on patients' glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid level control.

METHODS

In 3 purposively selected, rural, fee-for-service, primary care practices, African American patients with type 2 diabetes received point-of-care education, coaching, and medication intensification from a diabetes care management team made up of a nurse, pharmacist, and dietitian. In 5 randomly selected control practices matched for practice and patient characteristics, African American patients received usual care. Using univariate and multivariate adjusted models, we evaluated the effects of the intervention on intermediate (median 18 months) and long-term (median 36 months) changes in glycated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1c) levels, blood pressure, and lipid levels, as well as the proportion of patients meeting target values.

RESULTS

Among 727 randomly selected rural African American diabetic patients (368 intervention, 359 control), intervention patients had a significantly greater reduction in mean hemoglobin A1c levels at intermediate (-0.5 % vs -0.2%; P <.05) and long-term (-0.5% vs -0.10%; P <.005) follow-up in univariate and multivariate models. The proportion of patients achieving a hemoglobin A1c level of less than 7.5% (68% vs 59%, P <.01) and/or a systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg (69% vs 57%, P <.01) was also significantly greater in intervention practices in multivariate models.

CONCLUSION

Redesigning care strategies in rural fee-for-service primary care practices for African American patients with established diabetes results in significantly improved glycemic control relative to usual care.

摘要

目的

农村低收入非裔美国糖尿病患者的临床结局历来较差,获得最先进的糖尿病治疗的机会有限。我们旨在确定重新设计的初级保健模式对患者血糖、血压和血脂水平控制的效果。

方法

在 3 个有目的选择的农村自费初级保健实践中,2 型糖尿病的非裔美国患者接受了来自由护士、药剂师和营养师组成的糖尿病护理管理团队的即时护理教育、辅导和药物强化。在 5 个随机选择的匹配实践和患者特征的对照实践中,非裔美国患者接受了常规护理。使用单变量和多变量调整模型,我们评估了干预对糖化血红蛋白(血红蛋白 A1c)水平、血压和血脂水平的中期(中位数 18 个月)和长期(中位数 36 个月)变化的影响,以及达到目标值的患者比例。

结果

在 727 名随机选择的农村非裔美国糖尿病患者(368 名干预,359 名对照)中,干预组在单变量和多变量模型中,中期(-0.5%比-0.2%;P <.05)和长期(-0.5%比-0.10%;P <.005)随访时平均血红蛋白 A1c 水平的下降幅度明显更大。在多变量模型中,达到血红蛋白 A1c 水平<7.5%(68%比 59%,P <.01)和/或收缩压<140mmHg(69%比 57%,P <.01)的患者比例在干预实践中也明显更大。

结论

在既定糖尿病的农村自费初级保健实践中重新设计护理策略,与常规护理相比,可显著改善血糖控制。