• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相互冲突的需求或临床惰性:糖化血红蛋白升高的案例

Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin.

作者信息

Parchman Michael L, Pugh Jacqueline A, Romero Raquel L, Bowers Krista W

机构信息

VERDICT Health Services Research Center, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Tex 78229-4404, USA.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):196-201. doi: 10.1370/afm.679.

DOI:10.1370/afm.679
PMID:17548846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1886492/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the contribution of competing demands to changes in hypoglycemic medications and to return appointment intervals for patients with type 2 diabetes and an elevated glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) level.

METHODS

We observed 211 primary care encounters by adult patients with type 2 diabetes in 20 primary care clinics and documented changes in hypoglycemic medications. Competing demands were assessed from length of encounter, number of concerns patients raised, and number of topics brought up by the clinician. Days to the next scheduled appointment were obtained at patient checkout. Recent A1c values and dates were determined from the chart.

RESULTS

Among patients with an A(1c) level greater than 7%, each additional patient concern was associated with a 49% (95% confidence interval, 35%-60%) reduction in the likelihood of a change in medication, independent of length of the encounter and most recent level of A1c. Among patients with an A(1c) level greater than 7% and no change in medication, for every additional minute of encounter length, the time to the next scheduled appointment decreased by 2.8 days (P = .001). Similarly, for each additional 1% increase in A1c level, the time to the next scheduled appointment decreased by 8.6 days (P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The concept of clinical inertia is limited and does not fully characterize the complexity of primary care encounters. Competing demands is a principle for constructing models of primary care encounters that are more congruent with reality and should be considered in the design of interventions to improve chronic disease outcomes in primary care settings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨相互竞争的需求对2型糖尿病且糖化血红蛋白(A1c)水平升高患者降糖药物变化及复诊间隔时间的影响。

方法

我们在20家基层医疗诊所观察了211例成年2型糖尿病患者的基层医疗诊疗过程,并记录了降糖药物的变化。从诊疗时长、患者提出的问题数量以及临床医生提及的话题数量来评估相互竞争的需求。在患者结账时获取下次预约就诊的天数。从病历中确定近期的A1c值和日期。

结果

在A1c水平大于7%的患者中,患者每多提出一个问题,药物变更可能性降低49%(95%置信区间,35%-60%),这与诊疗时长和最近的A1c水平无关。在A1c水平大于7%且药物未变更的患者中,诊疗时长每增加一分钟,下次预约就诊时间减少2.8天(P = .001)。同样,A1c水平每增加1%,下次预约就诊时间减少8.6天(P = .001)。

结论

临床惰性的概念具有局限性,不能完全描述基层医疗诊疗过程的复杂性。相互竞争的需求是构建更符合实际的基层医疗诊疗模型的一项原则,在设计改善基层医疗环境中慢性病治疗效果的干预措施时应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin.相互冲突的需求或临床惰性:糖化血红蛋白升高的案例
Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):196-201. doi: 10.1370/afm.679.
2
Dynamical difference in patients encounters involving uncontrolled diabetes: an orbital decomposition analysis.涉及未控制糖尿病患者遭遇的动态差异:轨道分解分析。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):211-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01360.x.
3
Encounters by patients with type 2 diabetes--complex and demanding: an observational study.2型糖尿病患者的就医经历——复杂且要求高:一项观察性研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;4(1):40-5. doi: 10.1370/afm.422.
4
Relationship between patient medication adherence and subsequent clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes glycemic management.2型糖尿病血糖管理中患者药物依从性与后续临床惰性之间的关系。
Diabetes Care. 2007 Apr;30(4):807-12. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2170. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
5
Glycemic control and use of A1c in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病初级护理患者的血糖控制及糖化血红蛋白的应用
Prim Care Diabetes. 2015 Oct;9(5):385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
6
Association between diabetes patients' knowledge about medications and their blood glucose control.糖尿病患者的药物知识与其血糖控制之间的关联。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2008 Mar;4(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.01.002.
7
[INERTIA study: Clinical inertia in non-insulinized patients on oral hypoglycemic treatment. A study in Spanish primary and specialty care settings].[惯性研究:口服降糖治疗的非胰岛素治疗患者的临床惰性。一项针对西班牙初级和专科护理机构的研究]
Med Clin (Barc). 2014 Jun 6;142(11):478-84. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2013.02.032. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
8
Clinical predictors of disease progression and medication initiation in untreated patients with type 2 diabetes and A1C less than 7%.未经治疗的糖化血红蛋白(A1C)低于7%的2型糖尿病患者疾病进展和开始用药的临床预测因素。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):386-90. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1934. Epub 2007 Dec 14.
9
Primary Care Provider Encounter Cadence and HbA1c Control in Older Patients With Diabetes.初级保健提供者的就诊频次与老年糖尿病患者的 HbA1c 控制情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):e95-e101. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.018.
10
Patient adherence improves glycemic control.患者依从性可改善血糖控制。
Diabetes Educ. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):240-50. doi: 10.1177/0145721705274927.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovative Educational Tools Facilitating Lifestyle and Nutritional Interventions in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.创新教育工具助力1型糖尿病患者的生活方式与营养干预
Nutrients. 2025 Mar 14;17(6):1026. doi: 10.3390/nu17061026.
2
User Actions within a Clinical Decision Support Alert for the Management of Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性肾脏病高血压管理临床决策支持警报中的用户操作
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 May;16(3):595-603. doi: 10.1055/a-2554-3969. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3
Real-World Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiating Treatment with Oral Semaglutide.使用口服司美格鲁肽起始治疗的2型糖尿病患者的真实世界治疗模式
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Jul;15(7):1547-1559. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01589-4. Epub 2024 May 9.
4
Implementation of Health IT for Cancer Screening in US Primary Care: Scoping Review.美国初级保健中用于癌症筛查的健康信息技术实施:范围综述
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Apr 30;10:e49002. doi: 10.2196/49002.
5
Latino-White Disparities in Identification and Control of Elevated Blood Pressure Among Adults With Hypertension.拉丁裔-白人在高血压患者血压升高的识别和控制方面的差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):e033151. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033151. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
6
Does Clinical Decision Support Increase Appropriate Medication Prescribing for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction?临床决策支持是否能增加心血管风险降低的适当药物治疗?
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Oct 11;36(5):777-788. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220391R2. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
7
"Low-value" glycemic outcomes among older adults with diabetes cared for by primary care nurse practitioners or physicians: A retrospective cohort study.初级保健护士从业者或医生照顾的老年糖尿病患者的“低价值”血糖结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Sep;145:104532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104532. Epub 2023 May 22.
8
Equitable implementation of S.A.F.E. Firearm: A multi-method pilot study.公平实施 S.A.F.E. 枪支:一项多方法试点研究。
Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt A):107281. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107281. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
9
Effect of Clinical Decision Support at Community Health Centers on the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生中心的临床决策支持对心血管疾病风险的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46519.
10
Barriers and facilitators to implementing changes in opioid prescribing in rural primary care clinics.农村基层医疗诊所实施阿片类药物处方变更的障碍与促进因素
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 10;4(5):425-430. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.448.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapy modifications in response to poorly controlled hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus.针对血压控制不佳、血脂异常和糖尿病的治疗调整。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):475-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00006.
2
Encounters by patients with type 2 diabetes--complex and demanding: an observational study.2型糖尿病患者的就医经历——复杂且要求高:一项观察性研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;4(1):40-5. doi: 10.1370/afm.422.
3
Developing a quality measure for clinical inertia in diabetes care.制定糖尿病护理中临床惰性的质量衡量标准。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1836-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00436.x.
4
An endocrinologist-supported intervention aimed at providers improves diabetes management in a primary care site: improving primary care of African Americans with diabetes (IPCAAD) 7.一项由内分泌学家支持、针对医疗服务提供者的干预措施改善了基层医疗场所的糖尿病管理:改善非裔美国糖尿病患者的基层医疗(IPCAAD)7。
Diabetes Care. 2005 Oct;28(10):2352-60. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2352.
5
Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care?基层医疗中是否有时间对慢性病患者进行管理?
Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3(3):209-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.310.
6
Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control: do specialists differ from primary care physicians?对血糖控制不佳的临床惰性:专科医生与初级保健医生有差异吗?
Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):600-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.600.
7
Clinical Practice Recommendations 2005.2005年临床实践建议
Diabetes Care. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S1-79. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.suppl_1.s1.
8
Meta-analysis: glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus.荟萃分析:糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白与心血管疾病
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Sep 21;141(6):421-31. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00007.
9
Thirty-year trends in cardiovascular risk factor levels among US adults with diabetes: National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1971-2000.1971 - 2000年美国糖尿病成年患者心血管危险因素水平的30年趋势:国家健康与营养检查调查
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Sep 15;160(6):531-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh232.
10
When there is too much to do: how practicing physicians prioritize among recommended interventions.当有太多事情要做时:执业医师如何在推荐的干预措施中进行优先级排序。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jun;19(6):646-53. doi: 10.1007/s11606-004-0058-0.