Suppr超能文献

[患者和医疗专业人员(究竟)了解多少?执业护士对多重用药患者进行家访以支持初级保健中药物审查的剩余价值]

[How much do patients and health professionals (really) know? The surplus value of a home visit to the patient with polypharmacy by the practice nurse, to support medication reviews in primary care].

作者信息

Bosch-Lenders D, van den Akker M, Stoffers H E J H, van der Kuy H, Schols J M G A, Knottnerus J A

机构信息

Huisarts-onderzoeker, Vakgroep huisartsgeneeskunde UM Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2013 Apr;44(2):72-80. doi: 10.1007/s12439-013-0015-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy in older people should be addressed by an annual review of the chronic medication. In the PIL-study this was done by an integrated approach by GP, practice nurse, pharmacist, specialist and patient. All patients were first visited at home by the practice nurse.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

What 'over the counter' (OTC) medications do polypharmacy patients use? Do they know the indications of the prescribed medication? Does medication use according to the patient match with medication use according to the records of GP and pharmacist?

METHOD

Inclusion criteria were: age 60 years or older, daily use of five or more chronic medications, mental competence, and adequate command of the Dutch language. All patients were visited at home by the practice nurse, who made an inventory of the actual drug use.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty patients used a total of 5576 drugs, including 527 (9.4%) OTC medication. Patients knew the indication of 64% of the prescribed medication. The number of prescribed drugs that a patient actually used did not match the numbers known to GP and pharmacist. In 60.4% of all medication prescriptions there was complete agreement between GP, pharmacist and patient. On a patient level agreement was 18.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Home visits by the nurse practitioner to make an inventory of the medication as reported by the patient seem to have an added value.

摘要

背景

老年人的多重用药问题应通过对慢性药物治疗进行年度审查来解决。在PIL研究中,这是通过全科医生、执业护士、药剂师、专科医生和患者的综合方法来完成的。所有患者首先由执业护士进行家访。

研究问题

多重用药患者使用哪些“非处方药”(OTC)?他们是否知道所开药物的适应症?患者的用药情况与全科医生和药剂师记录中的用药情况是否相符?

方法

纳入标准为:年龄60岁及以上、每日使用五种或更多慢性药物、具备心智能力以及充分掌握荷兰语。所有患者均由执业护士进行家访,执业护士对实际用药情况进行清点。

结果

550名患者共使用了5576种药物,其中包括527种(9.4%)非处方药。患者知道64%所开药物的适应症。患者实际使用的处方药数量与全科医生和药剂师所知数量不相符。在所有药物处方中,60.4%的处方在全科医生、药剂师和患者之间完全一致。在患者层面,一致性为18.7%。

结论

执业护士进行家访以清点患者报告的用药情况似乎具有附加价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验