Department of General Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Int J Med Robot. 2013 Jun;9(2):152-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1492. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
The use of surgical robots has slowly gained an increasing presence in the realm of hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgery. With additional experience, anecdotal evidence has been useful in guiding patient selection for complex robotic procedures. In the following analysis, we reviewed our case series and looked for predictors of conversion in robotic HPB surgery.
We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent robotic HPB procedures by a single surgeon at two institutions during March 2006-June 2012. Patient demographics, operative data, procedure type and conversion information were recorded. Trends were analysed for indications for conversion. A subset analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatomy was performed and compared with laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy during the same time period by the same surgeon.
During this time period, 77 patients underwent robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic procedures. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon (J.M.) and included 38 males (49%) and 39 females (51%). Median age was 59 and the majority of patients were ASA class III. There were 24 conversions, which decreased in frequency from 2009 (7) to 2011 (3). Reasons for conversion included significant obesity and technical difficulty. Patients with conversions had more intraoperative blood loss (966 vs 176 ml), more frequently received transfusion (29% vs 2%) and were more likely to have postoperative intensive care. Overall length of stay was longer following conversion (8.3 vs 5.6 days).
Robotic-assisted hepatobiliary and pancreatic procedures are often extremely complex, with a significant learning curve. Recognizing factors that prohibit successful completion of a robotic-assisted surgical procedure is key for patient safety. Careful patient selection in the appropriate settings facilitates the maximal benefit of robotic-assisted complex HPB surgery.
手术机器人在肝胆胰(HPB)外科领域的应用逐渐增多。随着经验的增加,一些经验证据有助于指导复杂机器人手术的患者选择。在以下分析中,我们回顾了我们的病例系列,并寻找了机器人 HPB 手术中转的预测因素。
我们回顾性分析了 2006 年 3 月至 2012 年 6 月期间,由一位外科医生在两个机构进行的所有机器人 HPB 手术患者。记录了患者的人口统计学、手术数据、手术类型和中转信息。分析了中转的原因。对机器人辅助腹腔镜胰体尾切除术进行了亚组分析,并与同一时期由同一位外科医生进行的腹腔镜和开腹胰体尾切除术进行了比较。
在此期间,77 例患者接受了机器人肝胆胰手术。所有手术均由一位外科医生(J.M.)完成,包括 38 例男性(49%)和 39 例女性(51%)。中位年龄为 59 岁,大多数患者为 ASA Ⅲ级。有 24 例中转,其中 2009 年(7 例)和 2011 年(3 例)的中转频率降低。中转的原因包括肥胖和技术难度。中转患者术中出血量更多(966 与 176ml),更常需要输血(29%与 2%),更可能需要术后重症监护。中转后总住院时间较长(8.3 与 5.6 天)。
机器人辅助肝胆胰手术通常非常复杂,具有显著的学习曲线。认识到妨碍机器人辅助手术成功完成的因素对于患者安全至关重要。在适当的环境下,对患者进行仔细选择,有助于最大限度地发挥机器人辅助复杂 HPB 手术的优势。