Anesthesia Service and Pain Clinic, University Hospital Caremeau, Nîmes, France.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2284-95. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2928-4. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
The postoperative analgesic potential of periarticular anesthetic infiltration (PAI) after TKA is unclear as are the complications of continuous femoral nerve block on quadriceps function.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked (1) whether PAI provides equal or improved postoperative pain control in comparison to a femoral nerve block in patients who have undergone TKA; and (2) if so, whether PAI improves early postoperative quadriceps control and facilitates rehabilitation.
We randomized 60 patients to receive either PAI or femoral nerve block. During the first 5 days after TKA, we compared narcotic consumption, pain control, quadriceps function, walking distance, knee ROM, capacity to perform a straight leg raise, and active knee extension. Medication-related side effects, complications, operating room time, and hospitalization duration were compared.
Opioid consumption was lower in the PAI group during the first 8 postoperative hours (12.5 mg versus 18.7 mg morphine), as was reported pain at rest (1.7 versus 3.5 on a 10-point VAS). Thereafter, narcotic consumption and reported pain were similar up to 120 hours. More subjects in the femoral nerve block group experienced quadriceps motor block (37% versus 0% in the PAI group). On Days 1 to 3, subjects in the PAI group experienced better capacity to perform the straight leg raise, active knee extension, and had longer walking distances.
PAI provided pain control equivalent to that of a femoral nerve block while avoiding a motor block and its negative functional impacts. The data suggest it should be considered an alternative to a femoral nerve block.
Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
全膝关节置换术后关节周围麻醉浸润(PAI)的术后镇痛效果尚不清楚,股神经阻滞对股四头肌功能的并发症也不清楚。
问题/目的:我们询问(1)与股神经阻滞相比,PAI 是否为接受 TKA 的患者提供同等或更好的术后疼痛控制;(2)如果是这样,PAI 是否改善早期术后股四头肌控制并促进康复。
我们将 60 名患者随机分为 PAI 或股神经阻滞组。在 TKA 后 5 天内,我们比较了阿片类药物的消耗、疼痛控制、股四头肌功能、步行距离、膝关节活动度、直腿抬高能力和主动伸膝能力。比较了药物相关副作用、并发症、手术室时间和住院时间。
PAI 组术后 8 小时内(12.5mg 吗啡与 18.7mg 吗啡)阿片类药物消耗较低,静息时疼痛评分(10 分 VAS 评分 1.7 分与 3.5 分)较低。此后,至 120 小时时,阿片类药物消耗和报告的疼痛相似。股神经阻滞组更多的患者出现股四头肌运动阻滞(PAI 组 0%,股神经阻滞组 37%)。在第 1 天至第 3 天,PAI 组患者直腿抬高能力、主动伸膝能力较好,行走距离较长。
PAI 提供了与股神经阻滞相当的疼痛控制,同时避免了运动阻滞及其对功能的负面影响。数据表明,它应该被视为股神经阻滞的替代方法。
I 级,治疗研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。