Boscardin Christy K, Gonzales Ralph
Department of Medicine, Office of Medical Education, University of Caloifornia, San Francisco, USA.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Mar;39(3):123-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39018-7.
Despite the increasing use of patient satisfaction data for compensation and comparison of performance, low response rate and potential bias of the respondents pose a significant threat to validity of the data. The demographic profiles of respondents and nonrespondents to a patient satisfaction survey in the ambulatory care setting were compared to explore the impact ofnonresponse bias.
Patient satisfaction survey data were collected from October through December 2010 for outpatient facilities at a large academic medical center. The association between respondent characteristics and satisfaction ratings on three dimensions of the clinical care process--(1) interpersonal communication (clarity of language), (2) service delivery (overall care during visit), and (3) likelihood of recommending practice to others-were assessed with bivariate and multivariate linear regression. Weighted analyses were performed to examine the impact of nonresponse.
Surveys were mailed to 15,549 patients, of which 4,952 (32%) were returned. Respondents had greater proportions of elderly, female, and English speakers. Bivariate analyses showed significant difference in satisfaction ratings by age, language, and insurance type. Multivariate regression analysis showed significant confounding across variables. On the basis of the calculated weighted means, mean satisfaction ratings were discrepant for language and age; however, the overall satisfaction ratings for each dimension were minimally affected.
Nonresponse rates and satisfaction ratings differed by age, language, and insurance type. However, if it is assumed that nonrespondents within these demographic groups have similar satisfaction ratings as respondents, then nonresponse levels appear to have minimal effects on overall satisfaction ratings.
尽管患者满意度数据越来越多地用于薪酬发放和绩效比较,但低回复率和受访者的潜在偏差对数据的有效性构成了重大威胁。比较了门诊护理环境中患者满意度调查的受访者和未受访者的人口统计学特征,以探讨无应答偏差的影响。
收集了2010年10月至12月期间一家大型学术医疗中心门诊设施的患者满意度调查数据。通过双变量和多变量线性回归评估受访者特征与临床护理过程三个维度的满意度评分之间的关联,这三个维度分别为:(1)人际沟通(语言清晰度)、(2)服务提供(就诊期间的整体护理)以及(3)向他人推荐医疗机构的可能性。进行加权分析以检验无应答的影响。
共向15549名患者邮寄了调查问卷,其中4952份(32%)被退回。受访者中老年、女性和说英语者的比例更高。双变量分析显示,年龄、语言和保险类型在满意度评分上存在显著差异。多变量回归分析显示各变量间存在显著的混杂因素。根据计算出的加权均值,语言和年龄方面的平均满意度评分存在差异;然而,每个维度的总体满意度评分受影响最小。
无应答率和满意度评分因年龄、语言和保险类型而异。然而,如果假设这些人口统计学群体中的未受访者与受访者具有相似的满意度评分,那么无应答水平似乎对总体满意度评分影响最小。