• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2006 - 2014年医疗补助管理式医疗中退出医保计划与医疗质量之间的关联

Association Between Health Plan Exit From Medicaid Managed Care and Quality of Care, 2006-2014.

作者信息

Ndumele Chima D, Schpero William L, Schlesinger Mark J, Trivedi Amal N

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.

Department of Health Services Policy and Practice, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island3Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2524-2531. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7118.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.7118
PMID:28655014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5815071/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

State Medicaid programs have increasingly contracted with insurers to provide medical care services for enrollees (Medicaid managed care plans). Insurers that provide these plans can exit Medicaid programs each year, with unclear effects on quality of care and health care experiences.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency and interstate variation of health plan exit from Medicaid managed care and evaluate the relationship between health plan exit and market-level quality.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort of all comprehensive Medicaid managed care plans (N = 390) during the interval 2006-2014.

EXPOSURES

Plan exit, defined as the withdrawal of a managed care plan from a state's Medicaid program.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Eight measures from the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set were used to construct 3 composite indicators of quality (preventive care, chronic disease care management, and maternity care). Four measures from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems were combined into a composite indicator of patient experience, reflecting the proportion of beneficiaries rating experiences as 8 or above on a 0-to-10-point scale. Outcome data were available for 248 plans (68% of plans operating prior to 2014, representing 78% of beneficiaries).

RESULTS

Of the 366 comprehensive Medicaid managed care plans operating prior to 2014, 106 exited Medicaid. These exiting plans enrolled 4 848 310 Medicaid beneficiaries, with a mean of 606 039 beneficiaries affected by plan exits annually. Six states had a mean of greater than 10% of Medicaid managed care recipients enrolled in plans that exited, whereas 10 states experienced no plan exits. Plans that exited from a state's Medicaid market performed significantly worse prior to exiting than those that remained in terms of preventive care (57.5% vs 60.4%; difference, 2.9% [95% CI, 0.3% to 5.5%]), maternity care (69.7% vs 73.6%; difference, 3.8% [95% CI, 1.7% to 6.0%]), and patient experience (73.5% vs 74.8%; difference, 1.3% [95% CI, 0.6% to 1.9%]). There was no significant difference between exiting and nonexiting plans for the quality of chronic disease care management (76.2% vs 77.1%; difference, 1.0% [95% CI, -2.1% to 4.0%]). There was also no significant change in overall market performance before and after the exit of a plan: 0.7-percentage point improvement in preventive care quality (95% CI, -4.9 to 6.3); 0.2-percentage point improvement in chronic disease care management quality (95% CI, -5.8 to 6.2); 0.7-percentage point decrease in maternity care quality (95% CI, -6.4 to 5.0]); and a 0.6-percentage point improvement in patient experience ratings (95% CI, -3.9 to 5.1). Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in exiting plans had access to coverage for a higher-quality plan, with 78% of plans in the same county having higher quality for preventive care, 71.1% for chronic disease management, 65.5% for maternity care, and 80.8% for patient experience.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Between 2006 and 2014, health plan exit from the US Medicaid program was frequent. Plans that exited generally had lower quality ratings than those that remained, and the exits were not associated with significant overall changes in quality or patient experience in the plans in the Medicaid market.

摘要

重要性

各州医疗补助计划越来越多地与保险公司签约,为参保人提供医疗服务(医疗补助管理式医疗计划)。提供这些计划的保险公司每年都可能退出医疗补助计划,而这对医疗质量和医疗体验的影响尚不清楚。

目的

确定医疗计划退出医疗补助管理式医疗的频率和州际差异,并评估医疗计划退出与市场层面质量之间的关系。

设计、背景和参与者:对2006年至2014年期间所有综合医疗补助管理式医疗计划(N = 390)进行回顾性队列研究。

暴露因素

计划退出,定义为管理式医疗计划从一个州的医疗补助计划中撤出。

主要结局和测量指标

使用医疗保健有效性数据和信息集的八项指标构建3个质量综合指标(预防保健、慢性病护理管理和孕产妇护理)。将医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估中的四项指标合并为患者体验综合指标,反映受益人在0至10分的评分中给出8分及以上评分的比例。248个计划(2014年之前运营计划的68%,代表78%的受益人)有结局数据。

结果

在2014年之前运营的366个综合医疗补助管理式医疗计划中,106个退出了医疗补助计划。这些退出计划的参保人数为4848310名医疗补助受益人,平均每年有606039名受益人受到计划退出的影响。六个州平均有超过10%的医疗补助管理式医疗参保人参加了退出的计划,而10个州没有计划退出。从一个州的医疗补助市场退出的计划在退出前的预防保健(57.5%对60.4%;差异为2.9%[95%CI,0.3%至5.5%])、孕产妇护理(69.7%对73.6%;差异为3.8%[95%CI,1.7%至6.0%])和患者体验(73.5%对74.8%;差异为1.3%[95%CI,0.6%至1.9%])方面的表现明显比未退出的计划差。退出计划和未退出计划在慢性病护理管理质量方面没有显著差异(76.2%对77.1%;差异为1.0%[95%CI,-2.1%至4.0%])。计划退出前后市场总体表现也没有显著变化:预防保健质量提高0.7个百分点(95%CI,-4.9至6.3);慢性病护理管理质量提高0.2个百分点(95%CI,-5.8至6.2);孕产妇护理质量下降0.7个百分点(95%CI,-6.4至5.0);患者体验评分提高0.6个百分点(95%CI,-3.9至5.1)。参加退出计划的医疗补助受益人能够获得更高质量计划涵盖的服务,同一县内78%的计划在预防保健方面质量更高,71.1%在慢性病管理方面质量更高,65.5%在孕产妇护理方面质量更高,80.8%在患者体验方面质量更高。

结论和相关性

2006年至2014年期间,美国医疗补助计划中医疗计划退出情况频繁。退出的计划质量评级通常低于未退出的计划,且这些退出与医疗补助市场中计划的质量或患者体验的总体显著变化无关。

相似文献

1
Association Between Health Plan Exit From Medicaid Managed Care and Quality of Care, 2006-2014.2006 - 2014年医疗补助管理式医疗中退出医保计划与医疗质量之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2524-2531. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7118.
2
Association of Provider Performance with Changes in Insurance Networks.医疗服务提供者绩效与保险网络变化的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):1997-2002. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05784-4. Epub 2020 May 6.
3
Evaluation of Medicaid managed care. Satisfaction, access, and use.医疗补助管理式医疗评估。满意度、可及性与使用情况。
JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):50-5.
4
Do quality improvement strategies for Medicaid enrollees differ in Medicaid-dominant versus commercial managed care organizations?针对医疗补助计划参保者的质量改进策略在以医疗补助为主的组织与商业管理式医疗组织中有差异吗?
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Dec;9(12):806-16.
5
Quality management practices in Medicaid managed care: a national survey of Medicaid and commercial health plans participating in the Medicaid program.医疗补助管理式医疗中的质量管理实践:对参与医疗补助计划的医疗补助和商业健康保险计划的全国性调查。
JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1769-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1769.
6
The evolution of quality management in state Medicaid agencies: a national survey of states with comprehensive managed care programs.州医疗补助机构质量管理的演变:对实施全面管理式医疗计划的州进行的全国性调查。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Feb;28(2):72-82. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28007-4.
7
Quality of care for children in commercial and Medicaid managed care.商业保险和医疗补助管理式医疗中儿童的医疗服务质量。
JAMA. 2003 Sep 17;290(11):1486-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.11.1486.
8
Medicaid Expansion and Health Plan Quality in Medicaid Managed Care.医疗补助扩大化与医疗补助管理式医疗计划中的医保计划质量。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2821-2838. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12814. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
The Impact of Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type on Continuous Medicaid Enrollment: A Natural Experiment.医疗补助管理式医疗计划类型对连续医疗补助参保的影响:一项自然实验。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3770-3789. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13000. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Association of Medicaid-Focused or Commercial Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type With Outpatient and Acute Care.医疗补助重点计划或商业医疗补助管理式医疗计划类型与门诊和急性护理的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1672-1679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5408.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of refined management in operating room nursing on surgical efficiency and nursing satisfaction during laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer.精细化管理在结肠癌腹腔镜根治性切除术中的手术室护理对手术效率及护理满意度的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):506-514. doi: 10.62347/JUVO8905. eCollection 2024.
2
Composite measures of quality of health care: Evidence mapping of methodology and reporting.医疗保健质量的综合衡量指标:方法学和报告的证据图谱。
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0268320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268320. eCollection 2022.
3
Disruptions to the patient-provider relationship and patient utilization and outcomes: Evidence from medicaid managed care.破坏医患关系和患者利用及结果:来自医疗补助管理式医疗的证据。
J Health Econ. 2022 Jan;81:102574. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102574. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
4
Effects of forced disruption in Medicaid managed care on children with asthma.医疗补助管理式医疗中强制中断对哮喘儿童的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):668-676. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13643. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
Association of Medicaid-Focused or Commercial Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type With Outpatient and Acute Care.医疗补助重点计划或商业医疗补助管理式医疗计划类型与门诊和急性护理的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1672-1679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5408.
6
The Impact of Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type on Continuous Medicaid Enrollment: A Natural Experiment.医疗补助管理式医疗计划类型对连续医疗补助参保的影响:一项自然实验。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3770-3789. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13000. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Insurance cancellations in context: stability of coverage in the nongroup market prior to health reform.背景下的保险取消:医疗改革之前非团体市场的保险覆盖稳定性
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 May;33(5):887-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0005. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
2
The impact of demographic characteristics on nonresponse in an ambulatory patient satisfaction survey.人口统计学特征对门诊患者满意度调查中无应答情况的影响。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Mar;39(3):123-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39018-7.
3
Gaps in health insurance: why so many Americans experience breaks in coverage and how the Affordable Care Act will help: findings from the Commonwealth Fund Health Insurance Tracking Survey of U.S. Adults, 2011.医疗保险缺口:为何如此多美国人经历保险覆盖中断以及《平价医疗法案》将如何提供帮助:来自英联邦基金会2011年美国成年人医疗保险跟踪调查的结果
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Apr;9:1-22.
4
Health insurance status change and emergency department use among US adults.美国成年人的健康保险状况变化与急诊科就诊情况
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 23;172(8):642-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.34. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
5
Desperately seeking savings: states shift more Medicaid enrollees to managed care.拼命寻求节省开支:各州将更多医疗补助计划参保者转移至管理式医疗。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1627-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0836.
6
Improving the management of chronic disease at community health centers.改善社区卫生中心慢性病管理水平。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 1;356(9):921-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa062860.
7
M+C plan county exit decisions 1999-2001: implications for payment policy.1999 - 2001年M + C计划县退出决策:对支付政策的影响
Health Care Financ Rev. 2005 Spring;26(3):105-23.
8
Commercial plans in Medicaid managed care: understanding who stays and who leaves.医疗补助管理式医疗中的商业计划:了解谁留下以及谁离开。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):1084-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1084.
9
The impact of Medicaid managed care on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.医疗补助管理式医疗对门诊治疗敏感型疾病住院率的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00340.x.
10
The evolution of quality management in Medicaid managed care.医疗补助管理式医疗中质量管理的演变
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug;23(4):245-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.245.