• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种不同浓度与容量利多卡因用于超声引导锁骨下入路阻滞的随机比较

A randomized comparison between 3 combinations of volume and concentration of lidocaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):206-11. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318287fe53.

DOI:10.1097/AAP.0b013e318287fe53
PMID:23518863
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study compared 3 combinations of volume and concentration using the same total dose of lidocaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block.

METHODS

Ninety patients were randomized to 1 of 3 combinations of volume and concentration for lidocaine: (1) 52.5 mL of lidocaine 1%, (2) 35 mL of lidocaine 1.5%, and (3) 26.25 mL of lidocaine 2%. In all 3 groups, the total dose administered (525 mg) was the same. In addition, epinephrine 5 fg/mL was used in all subjects. The main outcome variable was onset time. The performance time, number of needle passes, block-related pain scores, success rate (surgical anesthesia), and the incidence of vascular puncture and paresthesia were also recorded. The total anesthesia-related time was defined as the sum of the performance and onset times.

RESULTS

The onset times, which were 18.8 ± 5.6 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.4-21.1 minutes), 20.7 ± 7.0 minutes (95% CI, 18.0-23.5 minutes), and 21.7 ± 6.0 minutes (95% CI, 19.1-24.2 minutes) for the 1%, 1.5%, and 2% groups, respectively, were not statistically different.Furthermore, the performance times (4.4-4.7 minutes), total anesthesia-related times (23.7-26.3 minutes), and rates of surgical anesthesia (90.0%-96.7%) were comparable among the 3 groups. The number of needle passes and procedural discomfort, as well as the incidence of paresthesia and vascular puncture, were also similar. There were minor differences in the patterns of block for individual nerves. In terms of sensory block, compared with the 2% group, more patients in the 1.5% group displayed a complete block of the ulnar and radial nerves at 10 and 20 minutes, respectively. In terms of motor block, the 2% group yielded the lowest of rate of complete block of the musculocutaneous nerve from 15 minutes onward.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an identical dose (525 mg) of adrenalized lidocaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block, we found no differences in onset time among 3 commonly used concentrations (1%, 1.5%, and 2%). Further studies are required to determine the optimal combination of volume and concentration of lidocaine for other ultrasound-guided approaches to the brachial plexus.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性、随机、观察者盲法研究比较了在相同利多卡因总量下,3 种不同容量和浓度组合用于超声引导锁骨下阻滞的效果。

方法

90 名患者随机分为 3 组,接受 1%利多卡因 52.5ml(组 1)、1.5%利多卡因 35ml(组 2)和 2%利多卡因 26.25ml(组 3)。所有 3 组的总剂量(525mg)相同。所有患者均使用肾上腺素 5fg/ml。主要观察指标为起效时间。还记录操作时间、穿刺针次数、阻滞相关疼痛评分、成功率(手术麻醉)、血管穿刺和感觉异常的发生率。总麻醉相关时间定义为操作时间和起效时间之和。

结果

3 组的起效时间分别为 18.8±5.6 分钟(95%可信区间[CI],16.4-21.1 分钟)、20.7±7.0 分钟(95%CI,18.0-23.5 分钟)和 21.7±6.0 分钟(95%CI,19.1-24.2 分钟),差异无统计学意义。进一步比较,3 组操作时间(4.4-4.7 分钟)、总麻醉相关时间(23.7-26.3 分钟)和手术麻醉成功率(90.0%-96.7%)相当。穿刺针次数和操作不适程度、感觉异常和血管穿刺发生率也相似。个别神经的阻滞模式存在细微差异。在感觉阻滞方面,与 2%组相比,1.5%组在 10 分钟和 20 分钟时尺神经和桡神经完全阻滞的患者更多;在运动阻滞方面,2%组从 15 分钟开始,肌皮神经完全阻滞率最低。

结论

在超声引导锁骨下阻滞中,使用相同剂量(525mg)的含肾上腺素利多卡因时,3 种常用浓度(1%、1.5%和 2%)的起效时间无差异。需要进一步研究确定其他超声引导臂丛神经阻滞方法中利多卡因容量和浓度的最佳组合。

相似文献

1
A randomized comparison between 3 combinations of volume and concentration of lidocaine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block.三种不同浓度与容量利多卡因用于超声引导锁骨下入路阻滞的随机比较
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 May-Jun;38(3):206-11. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318287fe53.
2
A prospective, randomized comparison between double-, triple-, and quadruple-injection ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block.前瞻性、随机对照研究三种不同剂量局麻药在超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞的效果。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):248-53. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31824611bf.
3
A prospective, randomized comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block.血管周围与神经周围超声引导腋路臂丛神经阻滞的前瞻性随机比较。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):473-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182576b6f.
4
A prospective, randomized comparison between single- and double-injection ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block.一项前瞻性、随机对照研究比较了单次和双次注射超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181c7717c.
5
A randomized comparison between infraclavicular block and targeted intracluster injection supraclavicular block.锁骨下阻滞与靶向肌间沟内注射锁骨上阻滞的随机比较。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):11-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000193.
6
A randomized comparison between costoclavicular and paracoracoid ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery.锁骨下与肋锁突下入路超声引导锁骨下臂丛阻滞用于上肢手术的随机对照比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;64(6):617-625. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0842-z. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
7
A Randomized Comparison Between Single- and Triple-Injection Subparaneural Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block.单次注射与三次注射腘旁坐骨神经阻滞的随机对照比较
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):315-20. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000253.
8
Concomitant infraclavicular plus distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blockade accelerates upper extremity anaesthesia and improves block consistency compared with infraclavicular block alone.与单独锁骨下阻滞相比,同时行锁骨下加远端正中、桡侧和尺侧神经阻滞可加速上肢麻醉,并提高阻滞的一致性。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Aug;107(2):236-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer101. Epub 2011 May 15.
9
A randomized comparison between double-injection and targeted intracluster-injection ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block.超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞中双注射法与靶向丛内注射法的随机比较。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Jun;118(6):1363-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000224.
10
A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary brachial plexus blocks.超声引导下锁骨上、锁骨下和腋路臂丛神经阻滞的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(4):366-71. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ac7d18.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is the Risk of Postoperative Neurologic Symptoms After Regional Anesthesia in Upper Extremity Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.在上肢手术中进行区域麻醉后出现术后神经系统症状的风险是多少?一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Dec 1;480(12):2374-2389. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002367. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
2
Effects of a fixed low-dose ropivacaine with different volume and concentrations on interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled trial.不同容量和浓度的固定低剂量罗哌卡因对肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的影响:一项随机对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Sep 30;16(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0248-4.