National Institute for Health Research Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at the South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058790. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
Progress in personalised psychiatry is dependent on researchers having access to systematic and accurately acquired symptom data across clinical diagnoses. We have developed a structured psychiatric assessment tool, OPCRIT+, that is being introduced into the electronic medical records system of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust which can help to achieve this. In this report we examine the utility of the symptom data being collected with the tool. Cross-sectional mental state data from a mixed-diagnostic cohort of 876 inpatients was subjected to a principal components analysis (PCA). Six components, explaining 46% of the variance in recorded symptoms, were extracted. The components represented dimensions of mania, depression, positive symptoms, anxiety, negative symptoms and disorganization. As indicated by component scores, different clinical diagnoses demonstrated distinct symptom profiles characterized by wide-ranging levels of severity. When comparing the predictive value of symptoms against diagnosis for a variety of clinical outcome measures (e.g. 'Overactive, aggressive behaviour'), symptoms proved superior in five instances (R(2) range: 0.06-0.28) whereas diagnosis was best just once (R(2):0.25). This report demonstrates that symptom data being routinely gathered in an NHS trust, when documented on the appropriate tool, have considerable potential for onward use in a variety of clinical and research applications via representation as dimensions of psychopathology.
个性化精神病学的进展取决于研究人员能够获得跨临床诊断的系统和准确获取的症状数据。我们开发了一种结构化的精神科评估工具 OPCRIT+,它正在被引入南伦敦和莫兹利国民保健信托基金会的电子病历系统,这有助于实现这一目标。在本报告中,我们研究了该工具收集的症状数据的实用性。对 876 名住院患者的混合诊断队列的横断面精神状态数据进行了主成分分析(PCA)。提取了六个解释记录症状 46%方差的成分。这些成分代表了躁狂、抑郁、阳性症状、焦虑、阴性症状和紊乱的维度。由成分得分表明,不同的临床诊断表现出不同的症状特征,其严重程度广泛。当比较症状对各种临床结果测量(例如“过度活跃、攻击性行为”)的诊断预测值时,在五种情况下,症状表现优于诊断(R²范围:0.06-0.28),而诊断仅在一次(R²:0.25)时表现最好。本报告表明,在 NHS 信托机构中常规收集的症状数据,在记录在适当的工具上时,具有通过表现为精神病理学维度,在各种临床和研究应用中进一步使用的巨大潜力。