Department of Anaesthesia, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2013 May;68(5):502-11. doi: 10.1111/anae.12177. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
It has been suggested that monitoring during total intravenous anaesthesia should include aspects of brain function. The current study used a manually adjusted target-controlled infusion of propofol for anaesthesia, guided to a bispectral index range of 55-60. Intra-operative responsiveness, as assessed by the isolated forearm technique, was compared with whether the bispectral index predicted/identified a patient's appropriate hand movements in responses to commands. Twenty-two women underwent major gynaecological surgery with total intravenous anaesthesia, propofol, remifentanil and atracurium. Sixteen women responded, on 80 occasions, with appropriate hand movements to commands during surgery, of which the bispectral index detected 47 (sensitivity 59%). The bispectral index suggested consciousness 220 times in the absence of movement responses (specificity 85%). The positive predictive value of a bispectral index response was 18%. While two women had vague recall about squeezing fingers, none had recall of surgery. For patients who responded more than once during surgery the bispectral index value associated with a response was not constant. Although there was no difference in the median (IQR [range]) effect site propofol concentration between intra-operative responses (2.0 (1.5-2.3 [1.2-4.0]) μg.ml(-1)) and eye opening after surgery (2.1 (1.7-2.8 [1.5-3.9]) μg.ml(-1)), the median (IQR [range]) bispectral index value at eye opening after surgery was significantly higher than that associated with responses during surgery: 75 (70-78 [51-93]) vs 61 (52-67 [37-80]) respectively, (p < 0.001). The manual control of propofol intravenous anaesthesia to target a bispectral index range of 55-60 may result in an unacceptable number of patients who are conscious during surgery (albeit without recall).
有人提出,在全静脉麻醉期间的监测应包括脑功能的各个方面。本研究使用人工调整的丙泊酚靶控输注进行麻醉,引导脑电双频指数(bispectral index,BIS)维持在 55-60 范围。通过孤立前臂技术评估术中反应性,并比较 BIS 是否可以预测/识别患者对指令的适当手部运动。22 名女性接受了全静脉麻醉、丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼和阿曲库铵的妇科大手术。16 名女性在手术期间共 80 次对指令做出适当的手部运动反应,其中 BIS 检测到 47 次(灵敏度 59%)。在没有运动反应的情况下,BIS 提示意识 220 次(特异性 85%)。BIS 反应的阳性预测值为 18%。虽然有两名女性模糊地记得捏手指,但没有一名女性记得手术。对于术中多次反应的患者,与反应相关的 BIS 值并不恒定。虽然术中反应(效应室丙泊酚浓度中位数(IQR [范围])2.0(1.5-2.3 [1.2-4.0])μg/ml(-1))和术后睁眼(2.1(1.7-2.8 [1.5-3.9])μg/ml(-1))的效应室丙泊酚浓度中位数(IQR [范围])之间无差异,但术后睁眼时的 BIS 值中位数(IQR [范围])明显高于术中反应时的 BIS 值:75(70-78 [51-93])与 61(52-67 [37-80]),(p<0.001)。将丙泊酚静脉麻醉的手动控制靶控到 BIS 范围 55-60 可能会导致相当数量的患者在手术中处于清醒状态(尽管没有记忆)。