Suppr超能文献

是否到了放弃常规手术引流的时候了?一家机构对 709 例胰十二指肠切除术的评估。

Is it time to abandon routine operative drain use? A single institution assessment of 709 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Apr;216(4):635-42; discussion 642-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.040.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Routine use of operative (primary) drains after pancreaticoduodenctomy (PD) remains controversial. We reviewed our experience with PD for postoperative (secondary) drainage and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rates based on use of primary drains.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified consecutive patients who underwent PD between 2005 and 2012 from our pancreatectomy database. Primary closed suction drains were placed at the surgeon's discretion. Patient and operative factors were assessed, along with POPF, complications, and secondary drain placement rates.

RESULTS

There were 709 PDs performed, and 251 (35%) patients had primary drains placed. Age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities were similar among groups; however, drained patients had slightly larger pancreatic ducts (mean diameter 3.8 mm vs 2.2 mm; p < 0.01). The overall secondary drainage rate was 7.1%. Primary drain placement did not affect the need for secondary drainage (with primary drain, 8.4% vs without primary drain 6.3%, p = 0.36), reoperation (5.6% vs 5.7%, p = 1.00), readmission (17.5% vs 16.8%, p = 0.89), or 30-day mortality (2.0% vs 2.5%, p = 0.80). When compared with the no drain group, patients with primary drains experienced higher rates of overall morbidity (68.1% vs 54.1%, p < 0.01) and significant POPF (16.3% vs 7.6%; p < 0.01), as well as longer hospital stays (13.8 days vs 11.3 days; p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, primary drain placement remained an independent risk factor for pancreatic fistula formation (hazard ratio 3.3, p < 0.01), but did not have an impact on secondary drainage rates (p = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of closed suction drains during pancreaticoduodenectomy does not appear to decrease the rate of secondary drainage procedures or reoperation, and may be associated with increased pancreatic fistula formation and overall morbidity. These data support foregoing routine primary operative drainage at time of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

摘要

背景

胰腺十二指肠切除术(PD)后常规使用手术(主要)引流仍然存在争议。我们根据主要引流管的使用情况,回顾了我们在 PD 术后(次要)引流和术后胰瘘(POPF)发生率方面的经验。

研究设计

我们从胰腺切除术数据库中确定了 2005 年至 2012 年间连续接受 PD 的患者。主要采用闭合式负压引流,由外科医生决定是否放置。评估患者和手术因素,以及 POPF、并发症和二次引流放置率。

结果

共进行了 709 例 PD,其中 251 例(35%)患者放置了主要引流管。各组患者的年龄、性别、体重指数和合并症相似;然而,引流组的胰管稍大(平均直径 3.8mm 与 2.2mm;p <0.01)。总的二次引流率为 7.1%。主要引流管的放置并不影响二次引流的需要(有主要引流管者为 8.4%,无主要引流管者为 6.3%;p = 0.36)、再次手术(5.6%与 5.7%;p = 1.00)、再入院(17.5%与 16.8%;p = 0.89)或 30 天死亡率(2.0%与 2.5%;p = 0.80)。与无引流组相比,放置主要引流管的患者总体发病率较高(68.1%与 54.1%;p <0.01)和显著的 POPF(16.3%与 7.6%;p <0.01),以及更长的住院时间(13.8 天与 11.3 天;p <0.01)。多变量分析显示,主要引流管的放置仍然是胰瘘形成的独立危险因素(危险比 3.3,p <0.01),但对二次引流率没有影响(p = 0.85)。

结论

胰腺十二指肠切除术中放置闭式负压引流并不能降低二次引流术或再次手术的发生率,反而可能增加胰瘘形成和总体发病率。这些数据支持在胰腺十二指肠切除术中常规不放置主要手术引流管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验