• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰体尾切除术后引流与不引流的随机对照试验研究方案。

Abdominal drainage versus no drainage after distal pancreatectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2019 Jun 7;20(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3442-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3442-0
PMID:31174583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6555976/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The placement of prophylactic intra-abdominal drains has been common practice in abdominal operations including pancreatic surgery. The PANDRA trial showed that the omission of drains following pancreatic head resection was non-inferior to intra-abdominal drainage in terms of postoperative reinterventions and superior in terms of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rate and fistula-associated complications. The aim of the present PANDRA II trial is to evaluate the clinical outcome with versus without prophylactic drain placement after distal pancreatectomy.

METHODS

The PANDRA II trial is a mono-center, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial with two parallel study groups. In the control group at least one passive intra-abdominal drain is placed at the pancreatic resection margin. In the experimental group no drains are placed. The primary endpoint of this trial will be the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) measuring all postoperative complications within 90 days. Secondary endpoints are in-hospital mortality and morbidity, including the rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, chyle leak, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, reinterventions and reoperations, surgical site infection, and abdominal fascia dehiscence. Moreover, length of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, and the rate of readmission after discharge from hospital (up to day 90 after surgery) are assessed. We will need to analyze 252 patients to test the hypothesis that no drainage is non-inferior to drain placement in terms of the CCI (δ 7.5 points) in a one-sided t test with a one-sided level of significance of 2.5% and a power of 80%.

DISCUSSION

The results of the PANDRA II trial will help to evaluate the effect of an omission of prophylactic intraperitoneal drainage on the rate of complications after open or minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00013763 . Registered on 6 March 2018.

摘要

背景

预防性腹腔引流在包括胰腺手术在内的腹部手术中已被广泛应用。PANDRA 试验表明,与腹腔引流相比,胰腺头切除术后不放置引流在术后再次干预方面没有劣势,在临床相关胰瘘发生率和瘘管相关并发症方面具有优势。本研究旨在评估预防性引流在胰体尾切除术后的临床效果。

方法

PANDRA II 试验是一项单中心、随机对照、非劣效性试验,分为两个平行的研究组。对照组至少在胰腺切除缘放置一个被动腹腔引流管,实验组不放置引流管。本试验的主要终点是综合并发症指数(CCI),用于评估术后 90 天内所有术后并发症。次要终点包括住院死亡率和发病率,包括术后胰瘘、乳糜漏、胰切除术后出血、胃排空延迟、再次干预和再次手术、手术部位感染和腹壁筋膜裂开的发生率。此外,还评估了住院时间、重症监护病房停留时间以及出院后(术后 90 天内)的再入院率。我们需要分析 252 例患者,以单侧 t 检验(单侧显著性水平为 2.5%,效力为 80%)来检验无引流在 CCI 方面不劣于引流放置的假设(差值为 7.5 分)。

讨论

PANDRA II 试验的结果将有助于评估开腹或微创胰体尾切除术后预防性腹腔引流对并发症发生率的影响。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS),DRKS00013763。注册于 2018 年 3 月 6 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e25/6555976/032d748446d7/13063_2019_3442_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e25/6555976/032d748446d7/13063_2019_3442_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e25/6555976/032d748446d7/13063_2019_3442_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Abdominal drainage versus no drainage after distal pancreatectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.胰体尾切除术后引流与不引流的随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jun 7;20(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3442-0.
2
Prophylactic abdominal drainage or no drainage after distal pancreatectomy (PANDORINA): a binational multicenter randomized controlled trial.预防性腹部引流或不引流在胰体尾切除术后(PANDORINA):一项双边多中心随机对照试验。
Trials. 2022 Sep 24;23(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06736-5.
3
No Need for Routine Drainage After Pancreatic Head Resection: The Dual-Center, Randomized, Controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707).胰腺头部切除术后无需常规引流:一项来自两个中心的、随机的、对照的 PANDRA 试验(ISRCTN04937707)。
Ann Surg. 2016 Sep;264(3):528-37. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001859.
4
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 21(8):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub2.
5
Prophylactic abdominal drainage after distal pancreatectomy (PANDORINA): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.预防性腹部引流在胰体尾切除术后(PANDORINA):一项国际性、多中心、开放性标签、随机对照、非劣效性临床试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 May;9(5):438-447. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00037-2. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
6
Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed-suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resection.胰腺切除术后使用闭管式引流与被动重力引流的随机对照试验结果。
Surgery. 2018 Nov;164(5):1057-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
7
Non-inferiority of open passive drains compared with closed suction drains in pancreatic surgery outcomes: A prospective observational study.开放式被动引流与封闭式负压引流在胰腺手术后结果方面的非劣效性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Surgery. 2018 Sep;164(3):443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.025. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
8
DRAPA trial--closed-suction drains versus closed gravity drains in pancreatic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.DRAPA试验——胰腺手术中闭式吸引引流与闭式重力引流的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 May 7;16:207. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0706-1.
9
Pancreatic resection: drain or no drain?胰腺切除术:置管引流还是不置管引流?
Surgery. 2013 Nov;154(5):1069-77. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
10
Intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: A systematic review.胰腺切除术后腹腔引流:一项系统评价。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 28;21(40):11458-68. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11458.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 16;5(5):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub6.
2
Prophylactic abdominal drainage versus no-drainage after left pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胰体尾切除术后预防性腹腔引流与不引流的系统评价和荟萃分析
Gland Surg. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):2043-2054. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-351. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of morbidity and pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy with versus without prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage.

本文引用的文献

1
Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience.胰尾部切除术后胰腺残端闭合技术与胰瘘形成:荟萃分析和单中心经验。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0197553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197553. eCollection 2018.
2
A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial of Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Routine Intraperitoneal Drainage.一项关于有或无常规腹腔内引流的远端胰腺切除术的前瞻性随机多中心试验。
Ann Surg. 2017 Sep;266(3):421-431. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002375.
3
Prospective trial to evaluate the prognostic value of different nutritional assessment scores in pancreatic surgery (NURIMAS Pancreas).
远端胰腺切除术后预防性腹腔引流与不进行预防性腹腔引流的发病率及胰瘘的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7215-7224. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001910.
4
EvidenceMap: a three-level knowledge representation for medical evidence computation and comprehension.证据图谱:一种用于医学证据计算和理解的三级知识表示。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 May 19;30(6):1022-1031. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad036.
5
Intraluminal catheter plasty. An alternative technique to remove tethered abdominal surgical drains.腔内导管成形术。一种去除腹部束缚式外科引流管的替代技术。
BJR Case Rep. 2021 Apr 29;7(4):20210025. doi: 10.1259/bjrcr.20210025. eCollection 2021 Jul 16.
6
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术预防性腹部引流。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 18;12(12):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub5.
7
The Landmark Series: Mitigation of the Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.里程碑系列:术后胰瘘的防治。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):1052-1059. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09251-6. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
8
To use indwelling drainage or not in dual-plane breast augmentation mammoplasty patients: A comparative study.双平面隆乳术患者是否使用留置引流:一项对比研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e21305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021305.
前瞻性试验评估不同营养评估评分在胰腺手术中的预后价值(NURIMAS Pancreas)。
Br J Surg. 2017 Jul;104(8):1053-1062. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10525. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery.胰腺外科预防性腹部引流的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):660-668. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10505. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
5
The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.国际研究小组(ISGPS)术后胰瘘定义与分级的2016年更新:11年后
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
6
Definition and classification of chyle leak after pancreatic operation: A consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery.胰腺手术后乳糜漏的定义与分类:国际胰腺手术研究组的共识声明
Surgery. 2017 Feb;161(2):365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.058. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
No Need for Routine Drainage After Pancreatic Head Resection: The Dual-Center, Randomized, Controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707).胰腺头部切除术后无需常规引流:一项来自两个中心的、随机的、对照的 PANDRA 试验(ISRCTN04937707)。
Ann Surg. 2016 Sep;264(3):528-37. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001859.
8
Drain Management after Pancreatoduodenectomy: Reappraisal of a Prospective Randomized Trial Using Risk Stratification.胰十二指肠切除术后的引流管理:使用风险分层对一项前瞻性随机试验的重新评估
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Oct;221(4):798-809. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage after pancreatic resection.胰腺切除术后预防性腹腔引流的系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5719-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5719.
10
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: number of positive nodes allows to distinguish several N categories.胰腺腺癌:阳性淋巴结数量可用于区分几种N分期类别。
Ann Surg. 2015 May;261(5):961-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000814.