• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自发性细菌性腹膜炎中革兰阳性球菌和革兰阴性多重耐药菌的频率增加。

Increasing frequency of gram-positive cocci and gram-negative multidrug-resistant bacteria in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

机构信息

2nd Department of Medicine, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Liver Int. 2013 Aug;33(7):975-81. doi: 10.1111/liv.12152. Epub 2013 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1111/liv.12152
PMID:23522099
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is historically caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) almost exclusively Enterobacteriaceae. Recently, an increasing rate of infections with Gram-positive cocci (GPC) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms was demonstrated.

AIMS

To assess possible recent changes of the bacteria causing SBP in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively recorded 47 cases (66% males) during a 4-year-period (2008-2011).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight (60%) patients had healthcare-associated infections while 15 (32%) received prophylactic quinolone treatment. GPC were found to be the most frequent cause (55%). The most prevalent organisms in a descending order were Streptococcus spp (n = 10), Enterococcus spp (n = 9), Escherichia coli (n = 8), Klebsiella pneumonia (n = 5), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (n = 4) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp (n = 3). Nine of the isolated bacteria (19%) were MDR, including carbapenemase-producing K. pneumonia (n = 4), followed by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli (n = 3) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2). MDR bacteria were more frequently isolated in healthcare-associated than in community-acquired infections (100% vs 50%, P = 0.006), in patients receiving long-term quinolone prophylaxis (67% vs 24%, P = 0.013) and in those with advanced liver disease as suggested by higher MELD score (28 vs 19, P = 0.012). More infections with GNB than GPC were healthcare-associated (81% vs 42%, P = 0.007). Third-generation cephalosporin resistance was observed in 49% and quinolone resistance in 47%.

CONCLUSIONS

GPC were the most frequent bacteria in culture-positive SBP and a variety of drug-resistant microorganisms have emerged. As a result of high rates of resistance in currently recommended therapy and prophylaxis, the choice of optimal antibiotic therapy is vital in the individual patient.

摘要

背景

自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)历史上几乎完全由革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)引起,主要为肠杆菌科。最近,革兰氏阳性球菌(GPC)和多重耐药(MDR)微生物引起感染的比例不断增加。

目的

评估肝硬化患者发生 SBP 的致病菌是否有近期变化。

方法

我们回顾性记录了 4 年间(2008-2011 年)的 47 例病例(66%为男性)。

结果

28 例(60%)患者有医源性感染,15 例(32%)接受预防性喹诺酮治疗。GPC 是最常见的原因(55%)。依次为最常见的病原体:链球菌属(n = 10)、肠球菌属(n = 9)、大肠杆菌(n = 8)、肺炎克雷伯菌(n = 5)、甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(n = 4)和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌属(n = 3)。9 株分离菌(19%)为 MDR,包括产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌(n = 4),其次为产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠杆菌(n = 3)和铜绿假单胞菌(n = 2)。医源性感染比社区获得性感染更常分离出 MDR 细菌(100% vs 50%,P = 0.006),长期接受喹诺酮类预防性治疗的患者(67% vs 24%,P = 0.013)和 MELD 评分较高(28 分 vs 19 分,P = 0.012)提示肝病更严重的患者。与 GPC 相比,GNB 感染更常见于医源性感染(81% vs 42%,P = 0.007)。第三代头孢菌素耐药率为 49%,喹诺酮耐药率为 47%。

结论

在培养阳性的 SBP 中,GPC 是最常见的细菌,出现了多种耐药微生物。由于目前推荐的治疗和预防方案中耐药率较高,在个体患者中选择最佳抗生素治疗方案至关重要。

相似文献

1
Increasing frequency of gram-positive cocci and gram-negative multidrug-resistant bacteria in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.自发性细菌性腹膜炎中革兰阳性球菌和革兰阴性多重耐药菌的频率增加。
Liver Int. 2013 Aug;33(7):975-81. doi: 10.1111/liv.12152. Epub 2013 Mar 24.
2
Extensively drug-resistant bacteria are an independent predictive factor of mortality in 130 patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or spontaneous bacteremia.广泛耐药菌是130例自发性细菌性腹膜炎或自发性菌血症患者死亡的独立预测因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 21;22(15):4049-56. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.4049.
3
Prevalence and risk factors of infections by multiresistant bacteria in cirrhosis: a prospective study.肝硬化患者多重耐药菌感染的患病率及危险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Hepatology. 2012 May;55(5):1551-61. doi: 10.1002/hep.25532. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
4
Epidemiology of nosocomial pneumonia in infants after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后婴儿医院获得性肺炎的流行病学
Chest. 2004 Feb;125(2):410-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.2.410.
5
A comparative study on nosocomial and community-acquired spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis at a university hospital.某大学医院肝硬化患者医院获得性与社区获得性自发性细菌性腹膜炎的对比研究
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun 1;34(6):655-663. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002328. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
Multidrug resistance and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Gram-negative bacteria from three Referral Hospitals of Amhara region, Ethiopia.来自埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区三家转诊医院的耐多药和产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的革兰氏阴性菌。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021 Mar 11;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12941-021-00422-1.
7
Antibiotic resistance in healthcare-related and nosocomial spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.医疗相关及医院获得性自发性细菌性腹膜炎中的抗生素耐药性
Eur J Clin Invest. 2017 Jan;47(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/eci.12701. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
Bacterial infections in cirrhosis: epidemiological changes with invasive procedures and norfloxacin prophylaxis.肝硬化中的细菌感染:侵入性操作及诺氟沙星预防导致的流行病学变化
Hepatology. 2002 Jan;35(1):140-8. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.30082.
9
IMPACT OF MICROBIOLOGICAL CHANGES ON SPONTANEOUS BACTERIAL PERITONITIS IN THREE DIFFERENT PERIODS OVER 17 YEARS.17年间三个不同时期微生物变化对自发性细菌性腹膜炎的影响
Arq Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan-Mar;55(1):23-27. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.201800000-08.
10
Polymorphonuclear counts in ascitic fluid and microorganisms producing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: an under-recognized relationship.腹水多形核细胞计数与自发性细菌性腹膜炎的微生物:一种未被充分认识的关系。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;48(10):1213-21. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.832367. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterising spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in southwestern Nigeria.尼日利亚西南部肝硬化和肝细胞癌患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的特征分析
Ghana Med J. 2025 Jun;59(2):52-59. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v59i2.2.
2
Fluoroquinolones for the Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: Are They Losing Ground?氟喹诺酮类药物用于肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的预防:它们正在失宠吗?
Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 2;15(4):586. doi: 10.3390/life15040586.
3
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Tunis Med. 2025 Jan 5;103(1):130-134. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v103i1.5412.
4
Clinical Findings, Bacterial Agents, and Antibiotic Resistance in Children with Spontaneous Peritonitis in Southern Iran: An Academic Tertiary Referral Center's Experience.伊朗南部儿童自发性腹膜炎的临床发现、细菌病原体和抗生素耐药性:一家学术性三级转诊中心的经验
Iran J Med Sci. 2024 Jun 1;49(6):369-376. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2023.98747.3082. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
CON: Ascitic fluid cell count should not be routinely sent with every therapeutic paracentesis to assess for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.反对意见:在每次治疗性腹腔穿刺时,不应常规送检腹水细胞计数以评估自发性细菌性腹膜炎。
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2023 Sep 18;22(4):143-145. doi: 10.1097/CLD.0000000000000081. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Norfloxacin versus alternative antibiotics for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacteria peritonitis in cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.诺氟沙星与其他抗生素预防肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 28;23(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08557-6.
7
A Prospective Study on the Clinical Significance of Infections in a Hospital Setting Among the Cirrhotic Patients and Their Outcomes.肝硬化患者医院感染的临床意义及其结局的前瞻性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 21;15(4):e37912. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37912. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Impact of Bacteria Types on the Clinical Outcomes of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.细菌类型对自发性细菌性腹膜炎临床结局的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 May;68(5):2140-2148. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07867-8. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
9
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Cirrhotic Patients: A Shift in the Microbial Pattern? A Retrospective Analysis.肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎:微生物模式的转变?一项回顾性分析。
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 24;29(4):256-266. doi: 10.1159/000518585. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Clinical, Laboratory and Bacterial Profile of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Vietnamese Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.越南肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的临床、实验室及细菌学特征
Hepat Med. 2022 Jul 30;14:101-109. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S369966. eCollection 2022.