Gopalakrishnan R, Subhalakshmi T P, Kuruvilla A, Jacob K S
Department of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Bagayam, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Postgrad Med. 2013 Jan-Mar;59(1):54-5. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.109496.
Rechallenge with clozapine, despite a history of clozapine-induced neutropenia is considered in patients with a good response to the drug in the past, for whom no other treatments are effective, and in cases where the risks of withholding treatment are greater than the risks of rechallenge. Dyscrasias that occur during rechallenge are reportedly earlier in onset and longer lasting. Strategies advocated during rechallenge include frequent monitoring of white blood counts, the use of lithium or Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factors. We report a case of a patient with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who developed neutropenia with clozapine as a result of which the drug was discontinued. However poor response to other first and second-generation antipsychotic medication and the persisting risk of harm to himself and others necessitated the reconsideration of clozapine. The patient was re-challenged with clozapine under the cover of Filgrastim, a Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor.
对于过去对氯氮平反应良好、没有其他有效治疗方法且停止治疗风险大于再次使用风险的患者,尽管有氯氮平诱发中性粒细胞减少症的病史,仍可考虑再次使用氯氮平。据报道,再次使用期间出现的血细胞异常发病更早且持续时间更长。再次使用期间提倡的策略包括频繁监测白细胞计数、使用锂盐或粒细胞集落刺激因子。我们报告一例难治性精神分裂症患者,使用氯氮平后出现中性粒细胞减少症,因此停用了该药物。然而,对其他第一代和第二代抗精神病药物反应不佳,且患者对自身及他人持续存在伤害风险,因此有必要重新考虑使用氯氮平。在粒细胞集落刺激因子非格司亭的掩护下,该患者再次接受了氯氮平治疗。