Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec, Québec City, QC, Canada.
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Apr;37(4):370-377. doi: 10.1177/02698811231154111. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
Rechallenge/continuation of clozapine in association with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) following neutropenia/agranulocytosis has been reported, but many questions remain unanswered about efficacy and safety. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of rechallenging/continuing clozapine in patients following neutropenia/agranulocytosis using CSFs.
MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception date to July 31, 2022. Articles screening and data extraction were realized independently by two reviewers, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 systematic review guidance. Included articles had to report on at least one case where clozapine was rechallenged/continued using CSFs despite previous neutropenia/agranulocytosis.
Eight hundred forty articles were retrieved; 34 articles met the inclusion criteria, totaling 59 individual cases. Clozapine was successfully rechallenged/continued in 76% of patients for an average follow-up period of 1.9 years. There was a trend toward better efficacy reported in case reports/series, compared with consecutive case series (overall success rates of 84% and 60%, respectively, -value = 0.065). Two administration strategies were identified, "as-needed" and prophylactic, both yielding similar success rates (81% and 80%, respectively). Only mild and transient adverse events were documented.
Although limited by the relatively small number of published cases, factors such as time of onset to first neutropenia and severity of the episode did not seem to impact the outcome of a subsequent clozapine rechallenge using CSFs. While the efficacy of this strategy remains to be further adequately evaluated in more rigorous study designs, its long-term innocuity warrants considering its use more proactively in the management of clozapine hematological adverse events as to maintain this treatment for as many individuals as possible.
粒细胞减少/粒细胞缺乏症后使用集落刺激因子(CSFs)重新挑战/继续氯氮平已被报道,但关于其疗效和安全性仍有许多问题尚未解答。本系统评价旨在评估粒细胞减少/粒细胞缺乏症后使用 CSFs 重新挑战/继续氯氮平的疗效和安全性。
从建库日期到 2022 年 7 月 31 日,检索 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycInfo 和 Web of Science 数据库。根据 2020 年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,由两名评审员独立进行文章筛选和数据提取。纳入的文章必须报告至少 1 例因先前发生粒细胞减少/粒细胞缺乏症而使用 CSFs 重新挑战/继续氯氮平的情况。
共检索到 840 篇文章,34 篇文章符合纳入标准,共 59 例。76%的患者成功重新挑战/继续使用氯氮平,平均随访时间为 1.9 年。病例报告/系列报道的疗效报告优于连续病例系列(总体成功率分别为 84%和 60%,-值=0.065)。确定了两种给药策略,“按需”和预防性,两者的成功率相似(分别为 81%和 80%)。仅记录到轻微和短暂的不良事件。
尽管由于发表病例相对较少,该研究受到限制,但首次粒细胞减少发生的时间和发作的严重程度等因素似乎并未影响随后使用 CSFs 重新挑战氯氮平的结果。虽然这种策略的疗效仍需要在更严格的研究设计中进一步充分评估,但它的长期无害性值得考虑更积极地在氯氮平血液学不良事件的管理中使用,以尽可能多地维持对这种治疗的使用。