Suppr超能文献

[氯氮平导致中性粒细胞减少后,对氯氮平耐药的精神分裂症障碍“超敏”患者再次使用氯氮平:一例报告]

[Clozapine rechallenge in resistant schizophrenia disorder affecting "super sensitive" patients, after neutropenia under clozapine: a case report].

作者信息

Huguet G, Lillo-Le Louet A, Darnige L, Loo H, Krebs M O

机构信息

Service hospitalo-universitaire, centre hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 108, rue de la Santé, 75674 Paris cedex 14, France.

出版信息

Encephale. 2013 May;39 Suppl 1:S42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Apr 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The frequency of agranulocytosis induced by psychoactive drugs is estimated the first year of around 0.8% under clozapine, against 0.13% under chlorpromazine (King and Wager, 1998 [3]). It is associated with a mortality rate of 5 to 10%, and requires heavy treatment, usually in an intensive care unit. The objective of this paper is to present a practical therapeutic answer (clozapine rechallenge with filgrastim) through a case report following a neutropenia episode preventing clozapine use.

CASE AND METHODS

B.N. aged 35, native of Martinique, shows a resistant schizophrenia disorder "ultra sensitive" to clozapine. Without any treatment, after 4 years in stable clinical state under clozapine, B.N. suffered three neutropenia episodes when absorbing clozapine (2008, 2010 and 2011). First, a literature survey was conducted along with a consultation of the head of pharmacovigilance regional center and the hematology referee. Then, a 4th clozapine treatment was decided under cover of filgrastim (G-CSF), the role of which is to limit the risk of a new neutropenia. After stopping all psychoactive drugs, except morphine, the subject benefited from a first 0.3mg filgrastim injection, the day before re-introducing 25mg clozapine. Before treatment: Leucocytes=4.8 G/L while absolute neutrophils count=2.4 G/L. Filgrastim injections were carried out at a rate of two 0.3mg injections per week. Clozapine was increased to reach 25mg every 3 days and electroconvulsivotherapy continued fortnightly while supervision was double: on the first hand, daily and clinical search for an increase in body temperature and signs of treatment intolerance, and on the other hand biological surveillance with NFS three times a week besides weekly clozapinemia. The well-informed consent of the patient was obtained.

RESULTS

Signs of improvement were noticed as early as the 8th day and after 8 weeks of treatment and 31 sessions of ECT, the patient was stabilized under clozapine at 300 mg per day. The evolution is clearly favorable, as PANNS evolved from 158 to 90. Neutropenia episodes were not observed with a lowest measured rate of 1.9 G/L neutrophils. The filgrastim dosage was then reduced to 0.3mg per week from the 7th week onwards, along with the pursuit of a weekly NFS supervision throughout the treatment. Tolerance is satisfying, with an improvement in lipid check, glycaemia, blood pressure and QT intervals during ECG.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The B.N. case isn't an isolated one as several articles refer to filgrastim use, combined with clozapine. This confirms the role of hematopoietic cytokines (mainly G-CSF) in neutropenia episodes induced by clozapine. Filgrastim dosage appears to be an important point with regards to the risk of a new neutropenia episode. Let's mention also that it is not a harmless treatment, it could hide the occurrence of neutropenia, besides it's expensive and invasive. Clinical and biological supervision is essential as the probability of an enhanced malignant hemopathy is low but nonetheless present. We also noticed a "biased notoriety of the clozapine", with the association with other hematotoxic molecules, the existence of a circadian rhythm of neutrophils or G-CSF, along with transitional or ethnical neutropenia. These points should be discussed thoroughly before exclusively accusing clozapine; this in turn would have consequences regarding the possibility of treatment resumption. Finally, association with lithium is also an option; several cases have already been reported.

摘要

引言与目的

据估计,精神活性药物所致粒细胞缺乏症的发生率在使用氯氮平的第一年约为0.8%,而使用氯丙嗪时为0.13%(King和Wager,1998 [3])。其死亡率为5%至10%,且需要重症治疗,通常在重症监护病房进行。本文的目的是通过一例因中性粒细胞减少症发作而停用氯氮平后的病例报告,给出一种切实可行的治疗方案(使用非格司亭进行氯氮平再激发治疗)。

病例与方法

B.N.,35岁,来自马提尼克岛,患有对氯氮平“超敏感”的难治性精神分裂症。在未接受任何治疗的情况下,在氯氮平治疗下病情稳定4年后,B.N.在服用氯氮平期间出现了三次中性粒细胞减少症发作(2008年、2010年和2011年)。首先,进行了文献检索,并咨询了地区药物警戒中心负责人和血液学专家。然后,决定在非格司亭(粒细胞集落刺激因子)的掩护下进行第四次氯氮平治疗,其作用是降低再次出现中性粒细胞减少症的风险。在停用所有精神活性药物(吗啡除外)后,患者在重新引入25mg氯氮平的前一天接受了首次0.3mg非格司亭注射。治疗前:白细胞=4.8 G/L,而绝对中性粒细胞计数=2.4 G/L。非格司亭注射以每周两次0.3mg的频率进行。氯氮平每3天增加至25mg,同时每两周继续进行一次电休克治疗,并且进行双重监测:一方面,每日临床检查体温升高情况和治疗不耐受迹象;另一方面,除每周监测氯氮平血药浓度外,每周进行三次中性粒细胞计数的生物学监测。获得了患者的充分知情同意。

结果

早在第8天就注意到了改善迹象,经过8周的治疗和31次电休克治疗后,患者在氯氮平每日300mg的剂量下病情稳定。病情演变明显良好,阳性和阴性症状量表(PANNS)评分从158降至90。未观察到中性粒细胞减少症发作,测得的最低中性粒细胞计数为1.9 G/L。从第7周起,非格司亭剂量减至每周0.3mg,并且在整个治疗过程中继续每周进行中性粒细胞计数监测。耐受性良好,血脂检查、血糖、血压以及心电图中的QT间期均有所改善。

讨论与结论

B.N.的病例并非孤立,有几篇文章提到了非格司亭与氯氮平联合使用的情况。这证实了造血细胞因子(主要是粒细胞集落刺激因子)在氯氮平所致中性粒细胞减少症发作中的作用。关于再次出现中性粒细胞减少症发作的风险,非格司亭剂量似乎是一个重要因素。还需提及的是,这并非无害治疗,它可能掩盖中性粒细胞减少症的发生,此外它昂贵且具有侵入性。临床和生物学监测至关重要,因为发生恶性血液病加重的可能性虽低但仍存在。我们还注意到“氯氮平的片面恶名”,以及它与其他血液毒性分子的关联、中性粒细胞或粒细胞集落刺激因子的昼夜节律存在,还有短暂性或种族性中性粒细胞减少症。在单纯指责氯氮平之前,这些要点应进行充分讨论;这反过来会对恢复治疗的可能性产生影响。最后,与锂联合使用也是一种选择;已有多例报告。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验