• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会保障残疾评估研究。

The Social Security Disability Evaluation Study.

作者信息

Kennedy C, Simmens S J, Pincus H A, Goldman H H, Sharfstein S S

机构信息

Division of Biometry and Applied Sciences, National Institute of Mental Health.

出版信息

New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1990 Spring(45):29-36. doi: 10.1002/yd.23319904505.

DOI:10.1002/yd.23319904505
PMID:2352528
Abstract

Disability has continued to gain attention as a research topic in the mental health field. Both the SSA and the National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research currently fund research aimed at understanding the vocational needs of severely mentally ill adults, particularly those in supportive employment programs. The National Institute of Mental Health funds research on disability and rehabilitation, particularly research on innovative approaches to increasing the individual's level of functioning and quality of life. All of these federal agencies anticipate continued funding of research on disability. This evaluation of the SSA's 1985 medical standards and guidelines by the APA is an example of the type of disability research that seeks to address issues related to individuals as well as important policy questions. In this evaluation, both the appropriateness and utility of the standards and guidelines were assessed, and the quality of disability decisions for severely mentally impaired applicants was studied.

摘要

在心理健康领域,残疾作为一个研究课题持续受到关注。社会保障局(SSA)和国家残疾与康复研究所目前都资助旨在了解重度精神疾病成年人职业需求的研究,特别是那些参与支持性就业项目的人。国家心理健康研究所资助有关残疾与康复的研究,尤其是关于提高个人功能水平和生活质量的创新方法的研究。所有这些联邦机构都预计会继续资助残疾研究。美国心理学会(APA)对社会保障局1985年医疗标准和指南的评估,就是这类旨在解决与个人相关问题以及重要政策问题的残疾研究的一个例子。在这次评估中,对标准和指南的适当性和实用性进行了评估,并研究了针对重度精神障碍申请人的残疾判定质量。

相似文献

1
The Social Security Disability Evaluation Study.社会保障残疾评估研究。
New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1990 Spring(45):29-36. doi: 10.1002/yd.23319904505.
2
[Social medicine expert assessment of occupational work capacity].[职业工作能力的社会医学专家评估]
Versicherungsmedizin. 2012 Jun 1;64(2):90.
3
[The craft of psychiatric evaluation].[精神病学评估的技巧]
Psychiatr Prax. 2005 Jul;32(5):258-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871825.
4
[Invalids due to psychiatric reasons].因精神原因导致的残疾者
Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr (1985). 1990;141(2):163-81.
5
The psychiatrist and the Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income programs.精神科医生与社会保障残疾保险和补充保障收入计划。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;39(8):879-83. doi: 10.1176/ps.39.8.879.
6
[Management of benefit cases with psychiatric and psychosomatic diagnosis for the insurance industry. Concepts for expert assessment of "difficult to objectify disease pictures" and the combination of expert opinion and case management].[保险业中患有精神和身心疾病诊断的受益案例管理。对“难以客观化的病症”进行专家评估的概念以及专家意见与病例管理的结合]
Versicherungsmedizin. 2012 Jun 1;64(2):82-4.
7
The effect of welfare reform on SSA's disability programs: design of policy evaluation and early evidence.福利改革对社会保障管理局残疾项目的影响:政策评估设计与早期证据
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(1):3-11.
8
Medical proof, social policy, and Social Security's medically centered definition of disability.医学证明、社会政策以及社会保障以医学为中心的残疾定义。
Cornell Law Rev. 2007 Jan;92(2):189-234.
9
[Project to identify factors influencing expert performance appraisal. A study of expert opinion research].[识别影响专家绩效评估因素的项目。专家意见研究]
Versicherungsmedizin. 2010 Sep 1;62(3):136-7.
10
Recent legislative and court activities relating to the SSI and SSDI programs for the mentally ill.近期与针对精神病患者的补充保障收入计划和伤残保险福利计划相关的立法及法庭活动。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990 May;41(5):560-2. doi: 10.1176/ps.41.5.560.

引用本文的文献

1
Unique issues in assessing work function among individuals with psychiatric disabilities.评估患有精神疾病的个体工作功能时的独特问题。
J Occup Rehabil. 2001 Sep;11(3):217-32. doi: 10.1023/a:1013078628514.