Friedrich Orsolya
Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, LMU Munich, Lessingstr. 2, 80336 Munich, Germany ; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Ethics in the Neurosciences (INM-8), Jülich Forschungszentrum, Jülich, Germany.
Neuroethics. 2013 Apr;6(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s12152-011-9145-1. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
Recent results from neuroimaging appear to indicate that some patients in a vegetative state have partially intact awareness. These results may demonstrate misdiagnosis and suggest the need not only for alternative forms of treatment, but also for the reconsideration of end-of-life decisions in cases of disorders of consciousness. This article addresses the second consequence. First, I will discuss which aspects of consciousness may be involved in neuroimaging findings. I will then consider various factors relevant to ethical end-of-life decision-making, and analyse whether and to what extent the above consequence applies to these factors. It will be shown that knowledge of the existence of partial awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness only influences end-of-life decision-making if certain background assumptions are made.
神经影像学的最新研究结果似乎表明,一些处于植物人状态的患者具有部分完好的意识。这些结果可能显示出误诊情况,这不仅表明需要采用其他治疗方式,还意味着在意识障碍病例中需要重新考虑临终决策。本文探讨的是第二个影响。首先,我将讨论意识的哪些方面可能与神经影像学研究结果相关。接着,我会考虑与符合伦理的临终决策相关的各种因素,并分析上述影响在何种程度上适用于这些因素。结果将表明,只有在做出某些背景假设的情况下,了解意识障碍患者存在部分意识这一情况才会影响临终决策。