Kantor S J
College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1990 Jun;13(2):241-54.
In doing intensive psychotherapy or analysis with patients who suffer both personality and affective disorders, one must simultaneously maintain psychologic and biologic perspectives. Cooper, when talking of patients suffering from panic disorders, states that analysts must distinguish between psychologic efforts to cope with miscarried brain function and the psychologic efforts to cope with disturbances of the intrapsychic world. This is also true of patients who have affective disorders. For instance, patients who suffer from untreated affective disorder often speak of their experience of themselves as being out of control. They complain that they can never predict the stability of their emotional states. This aspect of their illness must be conceptualized not as reflecting faltering defensive operations and inadequate compromise formation but as the reaction of an otherwise healthy personality to the experience of being intermittently overwhelmed by biologically generated mood states. Cooper also states that biologic illnesses must be regarded as having influences that are both developmental and ongoing. The psychoendocrine work of Puig-Antic demonstrates the existence of endogenous depression in latency age children and Carlson and Kashani's recent clinical observations in preschool children support the notion that this illness can arise during periods of development. For such patients, the normal developmental tasks of childhood and adolescence may be severely compromised. For instance, extreme mood fluctuations of inexplicable origin may serve as a major disruption in the consolidation of a healthy sense of object constancy. Before closing, I would like to briefly mention two examples of the difficulties encountered when attempting to medicate and analyze the same patient. Ostow mentions patients who may attempt to use what he refers to as the "drug cure" to reinforce their resistance to psychotherapy. The analyst must be ever alert for this. An example occurred during my analysis of a 35-year-old novelist who had entered treatment for writer's block. She had been on medication for a number of years, had a strong family history of depression, and had relapses each time the medication had been discontinued or decreased. During the eighth month of analysis she reported that she had an interesting experience. She had forgotten to take her evening medication, something extremely unusual for her. She knew that antidepressants suppressed rapid-eye-movement sleep and that stopping tricyclics was often associated with vivid dreams and nightmares. Thus, she thought that the nightmare she experienced that night, something to do with being beaten up, could be explained pharmacologically.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在对同时患有个性障碍和情感障碍的患者进行强化心理治疗或精神分析时,必须同时兼顾心理和生物学视角。库珀在谈到患有惊恐障碍的患者时指出,分析师必须区分应对大脑功能失调的心理努力和应对内心世界紊乱的心理努力。这对于患有情感障碍的患者同样适用。例如,患有未经治疗的情感障碍的患者常常表示自己感觉失控。他们抱怨自己永远无法预测情绪状态的稳定性。他们病情的这一方面不应被理解为反映了防御操作的失误和妥协形成的不足,而应被看作是原本健康的个性对间歇性被生物性产生的情绪状态压倒的体验的反应。库珀还指出,生物性疾病的影响必须被视为既有发育方面的,也有持续存在的。普伊格 - 安蒂克的心理内分泌学研究证明了潜伏期儿童内源性抑郁症的存在,卡尔森和卡沙尼最近对学龄前儿童的临床观察支持了这种疾病可能在发育阶段出现的观点。对于这类患者,童年和青少年时期的正常发育任务可能会受到严重影响。例如,不明原因的极端情绪波动可能会严重干扰健康的客体恒常感的巩固。在结束之前,我想简要提及在尝试对同一患者进行药物治疗和精神分析时遇到的两个困难的例子。奥斯特ow提到有些患者可能会试图利用他所谓的“药物治疗”来强化他们对心理治疗的抵抗。分析师必须时刻警惕这一点。一个例子发生在我对一位35岁小说家的分析过程中,她因写作障碍前来接受治疗。她已经服药多年,有强烈的抑郁症家族史,每次停药或减药都会复发。在分析的第八个月,她报告说自己有一次有趣的经历。她忘记服用晚上的药物了,这对她来说极其不寻常。她知道抗抑郁药会抑制快速眼动睡眠,停用三环类药物常常会伴有生动的梦境和噩梦。因此,她认为当晚经历的与被殴打有关的噩梦可以从药理学角度来解释。(摘要截取自400字)