• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较医院间的健康结果:伦巴第大区的经验。

Comparing health outcomes among hospitals: the experience of the Lombardy Region.

机构信息

Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Health Care Manag Sci. 2013 Sep;16(3):245-57. doi: 10.1007/s10729-013-9227-1. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10729-013-9227-1
PMID:23529708
Abstract

In recent years, governments and other stakeholders have increasingly used administrative data for measuring healthcare outcomes and building rankings of health care providers. However, the accuracy of such data sources has often been questioned. Starting in 2002, the Lombardy (Italy) regional administration began monitoring hospital care effectiveness on administrative databases using seven outcome measures related to mortality and readmissions. The present study describes the use of benchmarking results of risk-standardized mortality from Lombardy regional hospitals. The data usage is part of a general program of continuous improvement directed to health care service and organizational learning, rather than at penalizing or rewarding hospitals. In particular, hierarchical regression analyses - taking into account mortality variation across hospitals - were conducted separately for each of the most relevant clinical disciplines. Overall mortality was used as the outcome variable and the mix of the hospitals' output was taken into account by means of Diagnosis Related Group data, while also adjusting for both patient and hospital characteristics. Yearly adjusted mortality rates for each hospital were translated into a reporting tool that indicates to healthcare managers at a glance, in a user-friendly and non-threatening format, underachieving and over-performing hospitals. Even considering that benchmarking on risk-adjusted outcomes tend to elicit contrasting public opinions and diverging policymaking, we show that repeated outcome measurements and the development and dissemination of organizational best practices have promoted in Lombardy region implementation of outcome measures in healthcare management and stimulated interest and involvement of healthcare stakeholders.

摘要

近年来,政府和其他利益相关者越来越多地使用行政数据来衡量医疗保健结果,并对医疗保健提供者进行排名。然而,这些数据源的准确性经常受到质疑。自 2002 年以来,意大利伦巴第(Lombardy)行政区开始在行政数据库中使用与死亡率和再入院率相关的七个结果衡量标准来监测医院的护理效果。本研究描述了使用伦巴第地区医院风险标准化死亡率的基准测试结果。数据的使用是旨在改善医疗服务和组织学习的一般持续改进计划的一部分,而不是为了惩罚或奖励医院。特别是,分别针对每个最相关的临床学科进行了考虑医院间死亡率差异的分层回归分析。总体死亡率被用作因变量,通过疾病诊断相关分组数据考虑了医院的输出组合,同时还调整了患者和医院的特征。每家医院的年度调整死亡率被转换为一种报告工具,以用户友好且非威胁性的格式,直观地向医疗保健管理人员显示表现不佳和表现出色的医院。即使考虑到基于风险调整结果的基准测试往往会引起公众意见的分歧和政策制定的分歧,我们也表明,反复的结果测量以及最佳组织实践的制定和传播,已经促进了伦巴第地区在医疗保健管理中实施结果衡量标准,并激发了医疗保健利益相关者的兴趣和参与。

相似文献

1
Comparing health outcomes among hospitals: the experience of the Lombardy Region.比较医院间的健康结果:伦巴第大区的经验。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2013 Sep;16(3):245-57. doi: 10.1007/s10729-013-9227-1. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
2
Routine use of administrative data for safety and quality purposes--hospital mortality.常规使用行政数据进行安全性和质量监测——医院死亡率。
Med J Aust. 2010 Oct 18;193(S8):S100-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb04022.x.
3
Reliability of surgical outcomes for predicting future hospital performance.手术结果的可靠性可预测未来医院的绩效。
Med Care. 2014 Jun;52(6):565-71. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000138.
4
Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.入院时存在指标对医院质量评估的影响:医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)住院患者质量指标的经验
Med Care. 2008 Feb;46(2):112-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318158aed6.
5
Hospital Variation in Risk-Adjusted Pediatric Sepsis Mortality.医院间风险调整后儿科脓毒症死亡率的差异。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 May;19(5):390-396. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001502.
6
An administrative model for benchmarking hospitals on their 30-day sepsis mortality.一种用于对医院30天脓毒症死亡率进行基准比对的管理模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4037-x.
7
Patient safety analyses using Lombardy administrative archives.利用伦巴第行政区档案进行患者安全分析。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(2):136-48. doi: 10.1108/09526861111105095.
8
Measuring hospital performance in congenital heart surgery: administrative versus clinical registry data.衡量先天性心脏病手术中的医院绩效:行政数据与临床登记数据对比
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Mar;99(3):932-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.069. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
9
Statistical profiling of hospital performance using acute coronary syndrome mortality.利用急性冠状动脉综合征死亡率对医院绩效进行统计分析。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2012 Nov;23(10):546-51. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2011-064.
10
Reliability adjustment: a necessity for trauma center ranking and benchmarking.可靠性调整:创伤中心排名和基准测试的必要条件。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):166-72. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e318298494f.

引用本文的文献

1
A turnaround strategy: improving equity in order to achieve quality of care and financial sustainability in Italy. turnaround 策略:改善公平性,以实现意大利的护理质量和财务可持续性。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 20;17(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0878-x.
2
Do private hospitals outperform public hospitals regarding efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care in the European Union? A literature review.在欧盟,私立医院在效率、可及性和医疗质量方面是否优于公立医院?一项文献综述。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Apr;33(2):e434-e453. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2502. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
3
Evaluating organizational change in health care: the patient-centered hospital model.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment and improvement of the Italian healthcare system: first evidence from a pilot national performance evaluation system.意大利医疗体系评估与改进:国家绩效评估体系初步成果。
J Healthc Manag. 2012 May-Jun;57(3):182-98; discussion 198-9.
2
P.Re.Val.E.: outcome research program for the evaluation of health care quality in Lazio, Italy.P.Re.Val.E.:意大利拉齐奥地区医疗保健质量评估的结果研究项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 27;12:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-25.
3
The accuracy of present-on-admission reporting in administrative data.
评估医疗保健领域的组织变革:以患者为中心的医院模式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 8;18(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2877-4.
4
Insights on the effectiveness of reward schemes from 10-year longitudinal case studies in 2 Italian regions.来自意大利两个地区的10年纵向案例研究对奖励计划有效性的见解。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Apr;33(2):e474-e484. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2496. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
5
Patient satisfaction, patients leaving hospital against medical advice and mortality in Italian university hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis.意大利大学医院中的患者满意度、患者自动出院及死亡率:一项横断面分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 29;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2846-y.
6
Are performance measurement systems useful? Perceptions from health care.绩效评估系统有用吗?来自医疗保健领域的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2022-9.
7
Dynamic clustering of hazard functions: an application to disease progression in chronic heart failure.风险函数的动态聚类:在慢性心力衰竭疾病进展中的应用
Health Care Manag Sci. 2017 Sep;20(3):353-364. doi: 10.1007/s10729-016-9357-3. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
8
Benchmarking facilities providing care: An international overview of initiatives.对提供医疗服务的机构进行基准评估:国际举措概述。
SAGE Open Med. 2015 Sep 23;3:2050312115601692. doi: 10.1177/2050312115601692. eCollection 2015.
9
Antipsychotic drug exposure and risk of pulmonary embolism: a population-based, nested case-control study.抗精神病药物暴露与肺栓塞风险:一项基于人群的巢式病例对照研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 29;15:92. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0479-9.
10
Making governance work in the health care sector: evidence from a 'natural experiment' in Italy.让治理在医疗保健领域发挥作用:来自意大利一项“自然实验”的证据。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Jan;11(1):17-38. doi: 10.1017/S1744133115000067. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
入院时报告的准确性在行政数据中。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1946-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01300.x. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
4
What drives hospital performance? The impact of comparative outcome evaluation of patients admitted for hip fracture in two Italian regions.是什么驱动了医院的绩效?对在意大利两个地区因髋部骨折入院的患者进行比较结果评估的影响。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb;21(2):127-34. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000218. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
5
Variability in the measurement of hospital-wide mortality rates.医院死亡率的测量存在变异性。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2530-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1006396.
6
Using hospital mortality rates to judge hospital performance: a bad idea that just won't go away.利用医院死亡率来评判医院绩效:一个挥之不去的糟糕想法。
BMJ. 2010 Apr 20;340:c2016. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2016.
7
The inverse relationship between mortality rates and performance in the Hospital Quality Alliance measures.医院质量联盟指标中死亡率与绩效之间的负相关关系。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):1104-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1104.
8
Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates.医疗保险医院比较绩效指标与死亡率之间的关系。
JAMA. 2006 Dec 13;296(22):2694-702. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.22.2694.
9
Performance assessment in the context of multiple objectives: a multivariate multilevel analysis.多目标背景下的绩效评估:多变量多层次分析
J Health Econ. 2006 Nov;25(6):1029-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.07.009. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
10
Adverse outcomes in Belgian acute hospitals: retrospective analysis of the national hospital discharge dataset.比利时急症医院的不良结局:对国家医院出院数据集的回顾性分析。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Jun;18(3):211-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl003. Epub 2006 Mar 23.