Thonon Frédérique, Watson Jonathan, Saghatchian Mahasti
European and International Affairs, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
HealthClusterNet, Unit 1, Carleton Business Park, Skipton, UK.
SAGE Open Med. 2015 Sep 23;3:2050312115601692. doi: 10.1177/2050312115601692. eCollection 2015.
We performed a literature review of existing benchmarking projects of health facilities to explore (1) the rationales for those projects, (2) the motivation for health facilities to participate, (3) the indicators used and (4) the success and threat factors linked to those projects. We studied both peer-reviewed and grey literature. We examined 23 benchmarking projects of different medical specialities. The majority of projects used a mix of structure, process and outcome indicators. For some projects, participants had a direct or indirect financial incentive to participate (such as reimbursement by Medicaid/Medicare or litigation costs related to quality of care). A positive impact was reported for most projects, mainly in terms of improvement of practice and adoption of guidelines and, to a lesser extent, improvement in communication. Only 1 project reported positive impact in terms of clinical outcomes. Success factors and threats are linked to both the benchmarking process (such as organisation of meetings, link with existing projects) and indicators used (such as adjustment for diagnostic-related groups). The results of this review will help coordinators of a benchmarking project to set it up successfully.
我们对现有医疗机构基准项目进行了文献综述,以探究:(1)这些项目的基本原理;(2)医疗机构参与的动机;(3)所使用的指标;以及(4)与这些项目相关的成功因素和威胁因素。我们研究了同行评审文献和灰色文献。我们考察了23个不同医学专科的基准项目。大多数项目使用了结构、过程和结果指标的组合。对于一些项目,参与者有直接或间接的经济激励来参与(例如医疗补助/医疗保险报销或与医疗质量相关的诉讼费用)。大多数项目都报告了积极影响,主要体现在实践的改进和指南的采用方面,在较小程度上也体现在沟通的改善上。只有1个项目报告了在临床结果方面的积极影响。成功因素和威胁与基准过程(如会议组织、与现有项目的联系)以及所使用的指标(如针对诊断相关组的调整)都有关联。本综述的结果将有助于基准项目的协调者成功开展项目。