Intensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Pain. 2013 Oct;17(9):1307-15. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00311.x. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
Several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies use thermal pain stimuli to determine brain activation patterns during pain. Studies use either a standard temperature condition for all participants or an individualized temperature condition based on the individually determined pain threshold of the participant. The aim of the present study was to compare both conditions in the same participants.
Eighteen healthy participants (21-29 years) underwent four fMRI runs, in each of which they received three types of thermal stimuli: neutral (32 °C), warm (37 °C) and painfully hot. In two runs, the painfully hot stimulus was set at a standard temperature of 46 °C; in the other two runs, the temperature was set at the subject's individual pain threshold (46-48 °C). fMRI (blood oxygen level dependent) was performed on a 1.5 T MR scanner (GE Signa). Pre-processing and statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8) software.
While the stimulation temperatures were lower in the standard temperature condition, both conditions activated the same brain regions. When comparing the conditions directly to each other, we did not find significantly different grey matter activation patterns.
The similar activation patterns between the two conditions suggest that it is not necessary to use individualized stimuli per se. The temperature of 46 °C appeared to be an adequate temperature for standardized stimulation to observe significant brain activations related to thermal pain.
几项功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 研究使用热痛刺激来确定疼痛过程中的大脑激活模式。研究使用两种方案,一种是对所有参与者使用标准温度条件,另一种是根据参与者个体确定的疼痛阈值使用个体化温度条件。本研究的目的是在相同的参与者中比较这两种条件。
18 名健康参与者(21-29 岁)接受了四次 fMRI 扫描,在每次扫描中他们接受了三种类型的热刺激:中性(32°C)、温暖(37°C)和热痛。在两次扫描中,热痛刺激设置为标准温度 46°C;在另外两次扫描中,温度设置为参与者的个体疼痛阈值(46-48°C)。fMRI(血氧水平依赖)在 1.5T 磁共振扫描仪(GE Signa)上进行。预处理和统计分析使用统计参数映射(SPM8)软件进行。
虽然标准温度条件下的刺激温度较低,但两种条件都激活了相同的脑区。当直接比较两种条件时,我们没有发现显著不同的灰质激活模式。
两种条件之间相似的激活模式表明,本身没有必要使用个体化刺激。46°C 的温度似乎是标准化刺激观察与热痛相关的显著大脑激活的合适温度。