• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一致性健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ. 2013 Mar 25;346:f1049. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1049.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.f1049
PMID:23529982
Abstract

Economic evaluations of health interventions pose a particular challenge for reporting. There is also a need to consolidate and update existing guidelines and promote their use in a user friendly manner. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance. The primary audiences for the CHEERS statement are researchers reporting economic evaluations and the editors and peer reviewers assessing them for publication. The need for new reporting guidance was identified by a survey of medical editors. A list of possible items based on a systematic review was created. A two round, modified Delphi panel consisting of representatives from academia, clinical practice, industry, government, and the editorial community was conducted. Out of 44 candidate items, 24 items and accompanying recommendations were developed. The recommendations are contained in a user friendly, 24 item checklist. A copy of the statement, accompanying checklist, and this report can be found on the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force website (www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp). We hope CHEERS will lead to better reporting, and ultimately, better health decisions. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the CHEERS statement is being co-published across 10 health economics and medical journals. We encourage other journals and groups, to endorse CHEERS. The author team plans to review the checklist for an update in five years.

摘要

经济评估健康干预措施提出了一个特别的报告挑战。也需要整合和更新现有的指南,并以用户友好的方式促进其使用。《健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明》试图将以前的健康经济评估指南努力整合和更新为一个当前的、有用的报告指南。CHEERS 声明的主要受众是报告经济评估的研究人员以及评估其发表的编辑和同行评审人员。新的报告指南的需求是通过对医学编辑的调查确定的。根据系统评价创建了一个可能项目的清单。一个由学术界、临床实践、工业界、政府和编辑界代表组成的两轮、修改后的德尔菲小组进行了讨论。在 44 个候选项目中,制定了 24 个项目和相应的建议。建议包含在一个用户友好的、24 项检查表中。声明、配套检查表以及本报告的副本可在 ISPOR 健康经济评估发布指南工作组网站(www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp)上找到。我们希望 CHEERS 将导致更好的报告,并最终做出更好的健康决策。为了促进传播和采用,CHEERS 声明将在 10 种健康经济学和医学期刊上联合发表。我们鼓励其他期刊和团体支持 CHEERS。作者团队计划在五年内审查清单以进行更新。

相似文献

1
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.一致性健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
BMJ. 2013 Mar 25;346:f1049. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1049.
2
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)——解释与说明:国际卫生经济学会健康经济评估报告指南良好报告实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
3
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.健康经济评估报告统一标准(CHEERS)声明。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.010.
4
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.一致性健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
BJOG. 2013 May;120(6):765-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12241.
5
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.一致性健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
Clin Ther. 2013 Apr;35(4):356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
6
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.一致性健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Apr;29(2):117-22. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000160. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
7
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.健康经济评估报告统一标准(CHEERS)声明。
J Med Econ. 2013;16(6):713-9. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.784591. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
8
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.一致性健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jun;14(3):367-72. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0471-6.
9
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 May;31(5):361-7. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0032-y.
10
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.一致性健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2013 Mar 25;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-11-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in the Emergency Department: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.急诊科原发性自发性气胸的管理:一项成本效益分析。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Jul 2;6(4):100209. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100209. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
The emerging economic evidence and methods used to evaluate clinical registries: a systematic scoping review protocol.用于评估临床注册登记的新兴经济证据和方法:一项系统综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e100644. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100644.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Personalised Nutrition in Adults With Overweight and Obesity: PREVENTOMICS Studies in Poland and the UK.
超重和肥胖成年人个性化营养的成本效益:波兰和英国的PREVENTOMICS研究
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Jun;38(3):e70071. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70071.
4
The Cost-Effectiveness of Early Active Mobilization During Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU: An Economic Evaluation Alongside the Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Adults With Early Activity and Mobilization (TEAM) Trial.重症监护病房机械通气期间早期主动活动的成本效益:一项与机械通气成人早期活动与运动治疗(TEAM)试验并行的经济学评估。
Crit Care Med. 2025 Sep 1;53(9):e1725-e1735. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006715. Epub 2025 May 27.
5
Interventional arterial chemotherapy versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a health economic evaluation of open-label, randomised, phase 3 study.中国介入动脉化疗与索拉非尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌的对比:一项开放标签、随机、3期研究的卫生经济学评价
BMJ Open. 2025 May 27;15(5):e095508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095508.
6
Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside a natural experiment to evaluate the impact of later trading hours for bars and clubs in the night-time economy in Scotland: The ELEPHANT study.一项与自然实验同步进行的经济评估方案,以评估苏格兰夜间经济中酒吧和俱乐部延长营业时间的影响:大象研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 14;15(5):e095241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095241.
7
Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine-Coated vs. Standard Peripheral Insertion Central Catheters in Patients with Hematologic Disease: A Health Economic Analysis.评估氯己定涂层与标准外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管在血液病患者中的成本效益:一项卫生经济学分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 4;22(3):373. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030373.
8
Health economic evaluation of trans-tibial prosthetic suspension systems: a protocol for a pilot using an observational study and synthetic cohort.经胫骨假肢悬吊系统的卫生经济评估:一项使用观察性研究和合成队列的试点研究方案
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2025 Apr 12;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12962-025-00611-1.
9
Cost-effectiveness of community-based integrated care model for patients with diabetes and depressive symptoms.针对糖尿病合并抑郁症状患者的社区综合护理模式的成本效益
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 27;16(1):2986. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58120-x.
10
Application of Discrete Event Simulation Models for COPD Management: A Systematic Review.离散事件模拟模型在慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理中的应用:一项系统综述。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Mar 12;20:685-698. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S501054. eCollection 2025.