Rodríguez-Padial Luis, Akerström Finn, Robles-Gamboa Carolina, Andrés Josep, Ruiz-Baena Jessica
Cardiac Unit, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, 45005 Toledo, Spain.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2013 Mar;18(2):170-80. doi: 10.1111/anec.12009. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
Information is limited about the classification accuracy of electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in the presence of myocardial infarction (MI).
We evaluated LVH classification accuracy for a set of 16 ECG criteria and some combinations derived from them in 1642 patients (105 with MI) suspected of coronary heart disease with two-dimensional echocardiography evaluation and a standard 12-lead ECG recorded at the same time. Patients with left bundle branch block had previously been excluded. Measures of classification accuracy included sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and positive and negative predictive values.
Diagnostic accuracy varied widely for different LVH criteria. The criteria with the best overall performance had highest sensitivity in the presence of MI and sensitivities of approximately 30% with relatively low specificities ranging from 72% to 78%. However, the classification accuracy for them was similar to that for patients without MI. The prevalence of LVH in patients with MI was higher (56%) than in those with no MI (31%). Classification accuracy of the best single previously published LVH criteria was comparable to that of the best combinations of any three of them.
The classification accuracy of LVH criteria in the presence of MI is comparable to that in patients without MI, in part possibly due to the higher LVH prevalence in the MI group. The presence of a well-validated computer database facilitates comparative evaluation of ECG-LVH criteria and derivation of optimal combinations of criteria for any given clinical application.
关于心肌梗死(MI)存在时左心室肥厚(LVH)心电图(ECG)标准的分类准确性的信息有限。
我们对1642例疑似冠心病患者(其中105例有MI)进行了评估,这些患者同时接受二维超声心动图评估和标准12导联心电图检查,以确定一组16种ECG标准及其衍生的一些组合对LVH的分类准确性。先前已排除左束支传导阻滞患者。分类准确性的衡量指标包括敏感性、特异性、似然比以及阳性和阴性预测值。
不同LVH标准的诊断准确性差异很大。总体表现最佳的标准在存在MI时具有最高的敏感性,敏感性约为30%,特异性相对较低,范围在72%至78%之间。然而,它们的分类准确性与无MI患者的相似。MI患者中LVH的患病率(56%)高于无MI患者(31%)。先前发表的最佳单一LVH标准的分类准确性与其中任意三个的最佳组合相当。
MI存在时LVH标准的分类准确性与无MI患者的相当,部分原因可能是MI组中LVH患病率较高。拥有经过充分验证的计算机数据库有助于对ECG-LVH标准进行比较评估,并为任何给定的临床应用推导最佳标准组合。