• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

七氟醚单药及丙泊酚联合或不联合瑞芬太尼用于电休克治疗——一项随机交叉研究

Sevoflurane alone and propofol with or without remifentanil for electroconvulsive therapy-a randomised, crossover study.

作者信息

Begeç Z, Erdoğan Kayhan G, Toprak H I, Sahin T, Konur H, Colak C, Durmuş M, Ersoy M O

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Inonu University Medical Faculty, Malatya, Turkey.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 Mar;41(2):202-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1304100209.

DOI:10.1177/0310057X1304100209
PMID:23530786
Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of three anaesthetic regimens (propofol alone, propofol with remifentanil and sevoflurane alone), with respect to seizure duration and seizure quality in patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy. Thirty-nine patients underwent a total of 234 electroconvulsive therapy treatments in this prospective, observer blinded, crossover study. Each patient received either propofol 1 mg/kg alone (Group P), propofol 0.5 mg/kg and remifentanil 1 µg/kg (Group R), or sevoflurane alone 6% (Group S) for their initial electroconvulsive therapy session. The patients subsequently received an alternative regimen in their next session, such as from propofol 1 mg/kg alone to propofol 0.5 mg/kg and remifentanil 1 µg/kg, from propofol 0.5 mg/kg and remifentanil 1 µg/kg to sevoflurane alone 6%, or from sevoflurane alone 6% to a continuing alternation between drugs at each session, until their sixth session. Muscle paralysis was achieved with 1 mg/kg succinylcholine. Seizure duration, postictal suppression index, early and midictal amplitude were recorded. The mean motor and electroencephalogram seizure durations were significantly longer in Groups P and R compared to Group S (P <0.001). The postictal suppression index and early and midictal amplitude values were not significantly different among the groups. These findings indicate that the three anaesthetic regimens had similar effects on seizure quality parameters, although sevoflurane was associated with shorter seizure durations than propofol or propofol-remifentanil.

摘要

我们比较了三种麻醉方案(单独使用丙泊酚、丙泊酚与瑞芬太尼联用、单独使用七氟醚)在接受电休克治疗的患者中对癫痫发作持续时间和发作质量的效果。在这项前瞻性、观察者盲法、交叉研究中,39名患者共接受了234次电休克治疗。每位患者在其首次电休克治疗时,接受单独使用1mg/kg丙泊酚(P组)、0.5mg/kg丙泊酚和1μg/kg瑞芬太尼(R组)或6%七氟醚(S组)治疗。随后患者在下次治疗时接受另一种方案,例如从单独使用1mg/kg丙泊酚改为0.5mg/kg丙泊酚和1μg/kg瑞芬太尼,从0.5mg/kg丙泊酚和1μg/kg瑞芬太尼改为6%七氟醚,或从6%七氟醚改为每次治疗时药物的持续交替,直至第六次治疗。使用1mg/kg琥珀酰胆碱实现肌肉麻痹。记录癫痫发作持续时间、发作后抑制指数、发作早期和中期振幅。与S组相比,P组和R组的平均运动性癫痫发作和脑电图癫痫发作持续时间显著更长(P<0.001)。各组间发作后抑制指数以及发作早期和中期振幅值无显著差异。这些发现表明,三种麻醉方案对癫痫发作质量参数具有相似的影响,尽管七氟醚与比丙泊酚或丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼更短的癫痫发作持续时间相关。

相似文献

1
Sevoflurane alone and propofol with or without remifentanil for electroconvulsive therapy-a randomised, crossover study.七氟醚单药及丙泊酚联合或不联合瑞芬太尼用于电休克治疗——一项随机交叉研究
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013 Mar;41(2):202-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1304100209.
2
Sevoflurane/remifentanil versus propofol/remifentanil for electroconvulsive therapy: comparison of seizure duration and haemodynamic responses.七氟醚/瑞芬太尼与丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼用于电休克治疗的比较: seizure持续时间和血流动力学反应的对比 。(注:原文中“seizure”此处可能有误,结合语境推测可能是“发作”之类的意思,准确含义需结合更多背景信息确定)
J Int Med Res. 2014 Feb;42(1):111-9. doi: 10.1177/0300060513509036. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
3
Effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on seizure duration, stimulus amplitudes and recovery parameters during ECT.瑞芬太尼和阿芬太尼对电休克治疗期间癫痫发作持续时间、刺激幅度及恢复参数的影响。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1068-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00766.x.
4
Effects of the concurrent use of a reduced dose of propofol with divided supplemental remifentanil and moderate hyperventilation on duration and morphology of electroconvulsive therapy-induced electroencephalographic seizure activity: A randomized controlled trial.瑞芬太尼小剂量间断输注复合适度过度通气对丙泊酚电抽搐治疗中脑电活动持续时间和形态的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
5
Propofol alone, sevoflurane alone, and combined propofol-sevoflurane anaesthesia in electroconvulsive therapy.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003 Aug;31(4):396-400. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0303100408.
6
Remifentanil supplementation of propofol during electroconvulsive therapy: effect on seizure duration and cardiovascular stability.在电休克治疗期间瑞芬太尼补充丙泊酚:对癫痫发作持续时间和心血管稳定性的影响。
J ECT. 2005 Dec;21(4):235-8. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000180040.06338.ac.
7
Sevoflurane versus propofol for electroconvulsive therapy: effects on seizure parameters, anesthesia recovery, and the bispectral index.七氟醚与丙泊酚用于电抽搐治疗的比较:对抽搐参数、麻醉恢复和脑电双频指数的影响。
Turk J Med Sci. 2016 Apr 19;46(3):756-63. doi: 10.3906/sag-1502-110.
8
Sevoflurane versus propofol for induction of anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized crossover trial.七氟醚与丙泊酚用于电休克治疗麻醉诱导的随机交叉试验
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004 Apr;32(2):236-40. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0403200212.
9
Effects of the addition of remifentanil to propofol anesthesia on seizure length and postictal suppression index in electroconvulsive therapy.在电休克治疗中,丙泊酚麻醉添加瑞芬太尼对癫痫发作时长和发作后抑制指数的影响。
J ECT. 2008 Sep;24(3):203-7. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181662ca0.
10
Probability to tolerate laryngoscopy and noxious stimulation response index as general indicators of the anaesthetic potency of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil.作为七氟醚、丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼麻醉效能的一般指标,预测喉镜耐受和有害刺激反应指数的可能性。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 May;116(5):624-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew060.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Sevoflurane and Thiopental Used Over the Course of Electroconvulsive Therapy: Propensity Score Matching Analysis.七氟烷和硫喷妥钠在电休克治疗过程中的应用影响:倾向评分匹配分析
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 8;16:933622. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.933622. eCollection 2022.
2
Remifentanil in electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.瑞芬太尼用于电休克治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Dec;266(8):703-717. doi: 10.1007/s00406-016-0670-0. Epub 2016 Jan 28.