Suppr超能文献

瑞芬太尼和阿芬太尼对电休克治疗期间癫痫发作持续时间、刺激幅度及恢复参数的影响。

Effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on seizure duration, stimulus amplitudes and recovery parameters during ECT.

作者信息

Akcaboy Z N, Akcaboy E Y, Yigitbasł B, Bayam G, Dikmen B, Gogus N, Dilbaz N

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Ankara Numune Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1068-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00766.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Propofol may decrease seizure duration in electroconvulsive therapy. Although not proven, prolonged seizures may be more efficacious. The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare effects of alfentanil and remifentanil on seizure duration, recovery parameters and degree of stimulus amplitude in patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-four ASA I-II patients enrolled in this prospective, randomized trial, each receiving a total of seven electroconvulsive therapies. Patients were randomized to receive only Propofol, group P (0.75 mg kg-1, n=8), Propofol with alfentanil, group A (10 microg kg-1 alfentanil+0.5 mg kg-1 Propofol, n=8) and Propofol with remifentanil, group R (1 microg kg-1 remifentanil +0.5 mg kg-1 propofol, n=8) via an iv route. Supplemental doses of propofol were given as required to achieve loss of consciousness. Succinylcholine 0.5 mg kg-1 iv was given to all groups for muscular paralysis. We recorded hemodynamic parameters, cortical and motor seizure durations, and recovery parameters.

RESULTS

Mean motor seizure duration was found to be significantly longer in patients receiving propofol-remifentanil anesthesia (53.3+/-13.6 s) and propofol-alfentanil anesthesia (52.2+/-0.4 s) compared with propofol anesthesia (37.6+/-9.2 s) (P=0.001). Recovery parameters and stimulus amplitudes were similar in groups A and R; significantly different from group P (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding 10 microg kg-1 alfentanil or 1 microg kg-1 remifentanil to reduced doses of propofol provided unconsciousness and increased seizure durations. For patients who need higher stimulus amplitudes for longer seizure durations, combining low-dose propofol with alfentanil or remifentanil may be good alternative regimens for ECT.

摘要

背景与目的

丙泊酚可能会缩短电休克治疗中的癫痫发作持续时间。虽然未经证实,但延长癫痫发作可能更有效。本研究的目的是评估和比较阿芬太尼和瑞芬太尼对接受电休克治疗患者的癫痫发作持续时间、恢复参数和刺激幅度的影响。

方法

24例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I-II级患者纳入这项前瞻性随机试验,每位患者共接受7次电休克治疗。患者被随机分为仅接受丙泊酚组(P组,0.75mg/kg,n = 8)、丙泊酚联合阿芬太尼组(A组,10μg/kg阿芬太尼 + 0.5mg/kg丙泊酚,n = 8)和丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼组(R组,1μg/kg瑞芬太尼 + 0.5mg/kg丙泊酚,n = 8),通过静脉途径给药。根据需要给予补充剂量的丙泊酚以达到意识丧失。所有组均给予0.5mg/kg静脉注射琥珀酰胆碱用于肌肉松弛。我们记录了血流动力学参数、皮层和运动性癫痫发作持续时间以及恢复参数。

结果

与丙泊酚麻醉组(37.6±9.2秒)相比,接受丙泊酚 - 瑞芬太尼麻醉(53.3±13.6秒)和丙泊酚 - 阿芬太尼麻醉(52.2±0.4秒)的患者的平均运动性癫痫发作持续时间明显更长(P = 0.001)。A组和R组的恢复参数和刺激幅度相似;与P组有显著差异(P = 0.001)。

结论

在减少剂量的丙泊酚中添加10μg/kg阿芬太尼或1μg/kg瑞芬太尼可实现意识丧失并延长癫痫发作持续时间。对于需要更高刺激幅度以延长癫痫发作持续时间的患者,将低剂量丙泊酚与阿芬太尼或瑞芬太尼联合使用可能是电休克治疗的良好替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验