Suppr超能文献

血细胞损伤与术后出血:鼓泡式氧合器与膜式氧合器的比较及冠状动脉吸引观察

Blood cell trauma and postoperative bleeding: comparison of bubble and membrane oxygenators and observations on coronary suction.

作者信息

Nilsson L, Bagge L, Nyström S O

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;24(1):65-9. doi: 10.3109/14017439009101826.

Abstract

Blood cell trauma and postoperative bleeding were studied in 96 patients following coronary artery bypass grafting, with bubble oxygenator used in 47 cases and membrane oxygenator in 49. The haemocompatibility of membrane oxygenators was superior to that of the bubble type, as reflected by less haemolysis, better preservation of platelet function, less release of betathromboglobulin and less degranulation of neutrophil granulocytes. Coronary suction contributed to haemolysis, but did not affect platelet or granulocyte function. Fibrinolysis, postoperative blood loss and need for blood transfusion did not differ between the bubble and membrane oxygenator groups.

摘要

对96例行冠状动脉搭桥术的患者的血细胞损伤和术后出血情况进行了研究,其中47例使用鼓泡式氧合器,49例使用膜式氧合器。膜式氧合器的血液相容性优于鼓泡式氧合器,表现为溶血较少、血小板功能保存较好、β-血栓球蛋白释放较少以及中性粒细胞脱颗粒较少。冠状动脉吸引会导致溶血,但不影响血小板或粒细胞功能。鼓泡式氧合器组和膜式氧合器组在纤维蛋白溶解、术后失血量及输血需求方面无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验