Fenchel G, Seybold-Epting W, Schmidt K, Stunkat R, Hoffmeister H E
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1979 Jul-Aug;20(4):419-22.
The clinical course of two similar patient groups was compared in whom, during cardiopulmonary bypass, a membrane or bubble oxygenator was employed. According to our results there is no significant functional difference between the two types of oxygenators as long as the perfusion time does not exceed 90 minutes. Beyond this time limit, the membrane oxygenator has distinct advantages, particularly with regard to hemolysis. We presently prefer the bubble oxygenator. The use of a membrane oxygenator is restricted to complex open heart procedures with suspected technical problems.
对两组相似患者的临床病程进行了比较,这两组患者在体外循环期间分别使用了膜式氧合器或鼓泡式氧合器。根据我们的结果,只要灌注时间不超过90分钟,这两种类型的氧合器在功能上没有显著差异。超过这个时间限制,膜式氧合器具有明显优势,尤其是在溶血方面。我们目前更倾向于使用鼓泡式氧合器。膜式氧合器的使用仅限于怀疑有技术问题的复杂心脏直视手术。