• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作中的努力-回报失衡与丹麦劳动力长期病假风险。

Effort-reward imbalance at work and risk of long-term sickness absence in the Danish workforce.

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Apr;55(4):454-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31827dba5b.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e31827dba5b
PMID:23532196
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether effort-reward imbalance (ERI) at work predicts onset of register-based long-term sickness absence (LTSA) in a representative sample of the Danish workforce.

METHODS

We measured effort, reward, ERI, and covariates with self-administered questionnaires in a sample of 4775 employees. LTSA during 12-months of follow-up was assessed with a national register. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) with Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The HR of LTSA for a one-SD increase in ERI was 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.15) in the most-adjusted model. For effort, the HR for a one-SD increase was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.85-1.06) and for reward the HR for a one-SD decrease was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.03-1.26).

CONCLUSIONS

ERI was not associated with onset of LTSA. Low reward, however, predicted LTSA.

摘要

目的

在丹麦劳动力的代表性样本中,考察工作中的努力-回报失衡(ERI)是否预示着基于登记的长期病假(LTSA)的发作。

方法

我们使用自我管理问卷在 4775 名员工的样本中测量了努力、回报、ERI 和协变量。在 12 个月的随访期间,使用国家登记处评估 LTSA。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型计算了风险比(HRs)。

结果

在最调整的模型中,ERI 每增加一个标准差,LTSA 的 HR 为 1.03(95%置信区间[CI],0.93-1.15)。对于努力,每增加一个标准差的 HR 为 0.95(95%CI,0.85-1.06),而奖励每减少一个标准差的 HR 为 1.14(95%CI,1.03-1.26)。

结论

ERI 与 LTSA 的发作无关。然而,低回报预测了 LTSA。

相似文献

1
Effort-reward imbalance at work and risk of long-term sickness absence in the Danish workforce.工作中的努力-回报失衡与丹麦劳动力长期病假风险。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Apr;55(4):454-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31827dba5b.
2
Long-term sickness absence due to mental disorders is associated with individual features and psychosocial work conditions.因精神障碍导致的长期病假与个人特征及社会心理工作条件有关。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 22;9(12):e115885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115885. eCollection 2014.
3
Unwanted sexual attention at work and long-term sickness absence: a follow-up register-based study.工作场所不必要的性关注与长期病假缺勤:一项基于登记册的随访研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 30;16:678. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3336-y.
4
Workplace social capital and risk of long-term sickness absence. Are associations modified by occupational grade?工作场所社会资本与长期病假风险。这些关联会因职业等级而改变吗?
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Apr;26(2):328-33. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv244. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
Perceived and content-related emotional demands at work and risk of long-term sickness absence in the Danish workforce: a cohort study of 26 410 Danish employees.工作中感知到的和与内容相关的情绪需求与丹麦劳动力的长期病假风险:对 26410 名丹麦员工的队列研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2019 Dec;76(12):895-900. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106015. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
6
The longitudinal association between multiple job holding and long-term sickness absence among Danish employees: an explorative study using register-based data.丹麦雇员中多重职业与长期病假之间的纵向关联:基于登记数据的探索性研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1243-x. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
7
Long-term sickness absence of 32 chronic conditions: a Danish register-based longitudinal study with up to 17 years of follow-up.32 种慢性疾病的长期病假:一项丹麦基于登记的纵向研究,随访时间长达 17 年。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e020874. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020874.
8
Leadership Quality and Risk of Long-term Sickness Absence Among 53,157 Employees of the Danish Workforce.领导力素质与丹麦劳动力 53157 名员工长期病假风险的关系。
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Aug;62(8):557-565. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001879.
9
Dose-response relation between perceived physical exertion during healthcare work and risk of long-term sickness absence.医护工作中感知到的体力消耗与长期病假风险之间的剂量-反应关系。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012 Nov;38(6):582-9. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3310. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
10
Clinical and non-clinical depressive symptoms and risk of long-term sickness absence among female employees in the Danish eldercare sector.丹麦老年护理行业女性员工的临床和非临床抑郁症状与长期病假风险。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Mar;129(1-3):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.033. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
How does lowering psychosocial risks influence sickness absence? A prospective cohort study analyzed as a quasi-experiment.降低心理社会风险如何影响病假缺勤?一项作为准实验分析的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;34(1):136-142. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad211.
2
Estimating the potential reduction in future sickness absence from optimizing group-level psychosocial work characteristics: a prospective, multicenter cohort study in German industrial settings.通过优化团体层面的社会心理工作特征来估计未来病假可能减少的情况:一项在德国工业环境中的前瞻性多中心队列研究。
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2020 Nov 13;15(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12995-020-00284-x.
3
The longitudinal association between multiple job holding and long-term sickness absence among Danish employees: an explorative study using register-based data.
丹麦雇员中多重职业与长期病假之间的纵向关联:基于登记数据的探索性研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1243-x. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
4
Effort provides its own reward: endeavors reinforce subjective expectation and evaluation of task performance.努力本身就是一种回报:努力会强化对任务表现的主观期望和评价。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Apr;235(4):1107-1118. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4873-z. Epub 2017 Jan 25.