National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Occup Environ Med. 2019 Dec;76(12):895-900. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106015. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
This study aimed to examine whether high emotional demands at work predict long-term sickness absence (LTSA) in the Danish workforce and whether associations differ by perceived and content-related emotional demands.
We included 26 410 individuals from the Work Environment and Health in Denmark Study, a nationwide sample of the Danish workforce. Emotional demands at work were measured with two items: one assessing perceived emotional demands (asking how often respondents were emotionally affected by work) and one assessing content-related emotional demands (frequency of contact with individuals in difficult situations). LTSA was register based and defined as spells of ≥6 weeks. Respondents with LTSA during 2 years before baseline were excluded. Follow-up was 52 weeks. Using Cox regression, we estimated risk of LTSA per one-unit increase in emotional demands rated on a five-point scale.
During 22 466 person-years, we identified 1002 LTSA cases. Both perceived (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.28) and content-related emotional demands (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.13) predicted risk of LTSA after adjustment for confounders. Further adjustment for baseline depressive symptoms substantially attenuated associations for perceived (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.16) but not content-related emotional demands (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11). Individuals working in occupations with above-average values of both exposures had an increased risk of LTSA (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.52) compared with individuals in all other job groups.
Perceived and content-related emotional demands at work predicted LTSA, also after adjustment for baseline depressive symptoms, supporting the interpretation that high emotional demands may be hazardous to employee's health.
本研究旨在探讨工作中的高情绪需求是否会预测丹麦劳动力的长期病假(LTSA),以及这种关联是否因感知和内容相关的情绪需求而异。
我们纳入了来自丹麦工作环境和健康研究的 26410 名参与者,这是丹麦劳动力的全国性样本。工作中的情绪需求通过两个项目进行衡量:一个评估感知情绪需求(询问受访者在多大程度上因工作而受到情绪影响),另一个评估与内容相关的情绪需求(与处于困难情况下的个人接触的频率)。LTSA 通过登记确定,定义为≥6 周的缺勤期。在基线前 2 年内患有 LTSA 的参与者被排除在外。随访时间为 52 周。使用 Cox 回归,我们根据五分制评估情绪需求每增加一个单位,估计 LTSA 的风险。
在 22466 人年期间,我们确定了 1002 例 LTSA 病例。在调整混杂因素后,感知情绪需求(HR 1.20,95%CI 1.12 至 1.28)和与内容相关的情绪需求(HR 1.07,95%CI 1.01 至 1.13)均预测了 LTSA 的风险。进一步调整基线抑郁症状后,感知情绪需求的关联明显减弱(HR 1.08,95%CI 1.01 至 1.16),但与内容相关的情绪需求的关联没有减弱(HR 1.05,95%CI 1.00 至 1.11)。与其他所有工作群体相比,从事感知和内容相关的情绪需求均高于平均水平的职业的个体,LTSA 的风险增加(HR 1.32,95%CI 1.14 至 1.52)。
工作中的感知和与内容相关的情绪需求预测了 LTSA,即使在调整基线抑郁症状后也是如此,这支持了高情绪需求可能对员工健康有害的解释。