Leopold Christine, Mantel-Teeuwisse Aukje Katja, Seyfang Leonhard, Vogler Sabine, de Joncheere Kees, Laing Richard Ogilvie, Leufkens Hubert
WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Health Economics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH / Austrian Health Institute, Vienna, Austria ; WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmaceutical Policy, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
South Med Rev. 2012 Dec;5(2):34-41. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
This study aims to examine the impact of external price referencing (EPR) on on-patent medicine prices, adjusting for other factors that may affect price levels such as sales volume, exchange rates, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, total pharmaceutical expenditure (TPE), and size of the pharmaceutical industry.
Price data of 14 on-patent products, in 14 European countries in 2007 and 2008 were obtained from the Pharmaceutical Price Information Service of the Austrian Health Institute. Based on the unit ex-factory prices in EURO, scaled ranks per country and per product were calculated. For the regression analysis the scaled ranks per country and product were weighted; each country had the same sum of weights but within a country the weights were proportional to its sales volume in the year (data obtained from IMS Health). Taking the scaled ranks, several statistical analyses were performed by using the program "R", including a multiple regression analysis (including variables such as GDP per capita and national industry size).
This study showed that on average EPR as a pricing policy leads to lower prices. However, the large variation in price levels among countries using EPR confirmed that the price level is not only driven by EPR. The unadjusted linear regression model confirms that applying EPR in a country is associated with a lower scaled weighted rank (p=0.002). This interaction persisted after inclusion of total pharmaceutical expenditure per capita and GDP per capita in the final model.
The study showed that for patented products, prices are in general lower in case the country applied EPR. Nevertheless substantial price differences among countries that apply EPR could be identified. Possible explanations could be found through a correlation between pharmaceutical industry and the scaled price ranks. In conclusion, we found that implementing external reference pricing could lead to lower prices.
本研究旨在考察外部价格参照(EPR)对专利药品价格的影响,并对可能影响价格水平的其他因素进行调整,这些因素包括销量、汇率、人均国内生产总值(GDP)、药品总支出(TPE)以及制药行业规模。
2007年和2008年14个欧洲国家14种专利产品的价格数据来自奥地利卫生研究所的药品价格信息服务处。根据以欧元计的单位出厂价格,计算每个国家和每种产品的标准化排名。在回归分析中,对每个国家和产品的标准化排名进行加权;每个国家的权重总和相同,但在一个国家内,权重与该年份的销量成比例(数据来自艾美仕市场研究公司)。利用“R”程序对标准化排名进行了多项统计分析,包括多元回归分析(包括人均GDP和国家产业规模等变量)。
本研究表明,平均而言,作为一种定价政策,EPR会导致价格降低。然而,采用EPR的国家之间价格水平差异巨大,这证实了价格水平不仅受EPR驱动。未调整的线性回归模型证实,在一个国家应用EPR与较低的标准化加权排名相关(p = 0.002)。在最终模型中纳入人均药品总支出和人均GDP后,这种相关性依然存在。
研究表明,对于专利产品,采用EPR的国家价格总体上较低。然而,可以确定采用EPR的国家之间存在巨大的价格差异。通过制药行业与标准化价格排名之间的相关性可以找到可能的解释。总之,我们发现实施外部参考定价可能会导致价格降低。