Liang Zhong-Guo, Zhu Xiao-Dong, Tan Ai-Hua, Jiang Yan-Ming, Qu Song, Su Fang, Xu Guo-Zeng
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Cancer Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Automomous Region. Nanning, China.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(1):515-21. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.1.515.
To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (the treatment group) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (the control group) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
The search strategy included Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Internet Web, Chinese Biomedical Database and Wanfang Database. We also searched reference lists of articles and the volumes of abstracts of scientific meetings. All randomized controlled trials were included for a meta-analysis performed with RevMan 5.1.0. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system (GRADE) was used to rate the level of evidence.
Eleven studies were included. Risk ratios of 0.99 (95%CI 0.72-1.36), 0.37 (95%CI 0.20-0.69), 1.08 (95%CI 0.84-1.38), 0.98 (95%CI 0.75-1.27) were observed for 3 years overall survival, 3 years progression-free survival, 2 years loco-regional failure-free survival and 2 years distant metastasis failure-free survival. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group in the 11 studies. Risk ratios of 1.90 (95%CI 1.24-2.92), 2.67 (95%CI 0.64-11.1), 1.04 (95%CI 0.79-1.37), 0.98 (95%CI 0.27-3.52) were found for grade 3-4 leukopenia, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3-4 mucous membrane, and grade 3-4 hepatic hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity, the most significant toxicities for patients.
Compared with the control group, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy was well tolerated but could not significantly improve prognosis in terms of overall survival, loco-regional failure-free survival or distant metastasis failure-free survival.
评估诱导化疗序贯同步放化疗(治疗组)与同步放化疗联合或不联合辅助化疗(对照组)治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效和毒性。
检索策略包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、中国生物医学数据库和万方数据库。我们还检索了文章的参考文献列表和科学会议摘要集。纳入所有随机对照试验进行RevMan 5.1.0软件的荟萃分析。采用推荐分级的评估、制定与评价系统(GRADE)对证据水平进行分级。
纳入11项研究。3年总生存率、3年无进展生存率、2年局部区域无复发生存率和2年远处转移无复发生存率的风险比分别为0.99(95%CI 0.72 - 1.36)、0.37(95%CI 0.20 - 0.69)、1.08(95%CI 0.84 - 1.38)、0.98(95%CI 0.75 - 1.27)。11项研究中两组均无治疗相关死亡。3 - 4级白细胞减少、3 - 4级血小板减少、3 - 4级黏膜反应以及3 - 4级肝脏血液学和胃肠道毒性的风险比分别为1.90(95%CI 1.24 - 2.92)、2.67(95%CI 0.64 - 11.1)、1.04(95%CI 0.79 - 1.37)、0.98(95%CI 0.27 - 3.52),这些是对患者影响最显著的毒性反应。
与对照组相比,诱导化疗序贯同步放化疗耐受性良好,但在总生存率、局部区域无复发生存率或远处转移无复发生存率方面不能显著改善预后。