• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗重型 A 型血友病的方案-预防治疗与按需治疗的成本效用模型。

Treatment for life for severe haemophilia A- A cost-utility model for prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment.

机构信息

Plasma Protein Therapeutics Association, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA.

出版信息

Haemophilia. 2013 Jul;19(4):e228-38. doi: 10.1111/hae.12121. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1111/hae.12121
PMID:23534877
Abstract

Prophylaxis has been established as the treatment of choice in children with haemophilia and its continuation into the adult years has been shown to decrease morbidity throughout life. The cost of factor therapy has made the option questionable in cost-effectiveness studies. The role of prophylaxis in pharmacokinetic dosage and tolerization against inhibitor formation were used to model the cost utility of prophylaxis vs. on-demand (OD) therapy over a lifetime horizon in severe haemophilia A. The model was applied to a single provider national health system exemplified by the United Kingdom's National Health Service and a third party provider in the United States. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated and compared to threshold values used by payer agencies to guide reimbursement decisions. A cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was also estimated for Sweden. Prophylaxis was dominant over OD treatment in the UK. The model resulted in an ICER - $68 000 - within the range of treatments reimbursed in the USA. In Sweden, a cost/QALY of SEK 1.1 million was also within the range of reimbursed treatments in that country. Dosage- and treatment-induced inhibitor incidence were the most important variables in the model. Subject to continuing clinical evidence of the effectiveness of pharmacokinetic dosage and the role of prophylaxis in decreasing inhibitor incidence, treatment for life with prophylaxis is a cost-effective therapy, using current criteria for the reimbursement of health care technologies in a number of countries.

摘要

预防治疗已被确立为儿童血友病的首选治疗方法,其在成年期的持续应用已被证明可降低终生发病率。由于因子治疗的费用较高,在成本效益研究中,这种治疗方案的选择受到了质疑。本研究旨在通过对药代动力学剂量和抑制物形成的耐受作用进行建模,比较终身接受预防治疗与按需治疗(OD)对严重 A 型血友病患者的成本效用。该模型应用于单一提供者的国家卫生系统,如英国国民保健制度(NHS)和美国的第三方提供者。并估计增量成本效益比(ICER),并与支付机构用于指导报销决策的阈值进行比较。还对瑞典的每质量调整生命年(QALY)成本进行了估计。预防治疗在英国优于 OD 治疗。该模型得出的 ICER 为 68000 美元,处于美国可报销治疗范围之内。在瑞典,每 QALY 的成本为 110 万瑞典克朗,也在该国可报销治疗范围之内。剂量和治疗诱导的抑制物发生率是模型中最重要的变量。如果继续有临床证据表明药代动力学剂量的有效性和预防治疗在降低抑制物发生率方面的作用,那么终生接受预防治疗是一种具有成本效益的治疗方法,符合目前一些国家对医疗技术报销的标准。

相似文献

1
Treatment for life for severe haemophilia A- A cost-utility model for prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment.用于治疗重型 A 型血友病的方案-预防治疗与按需治疗的成本效用模型。
Haemophilia. 2013 Jul;19(4):e228-38. doi: 10.1111/hae.12121. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
2
Cost-utility analysis of primary prophylaxis versus treatment on-demand for individuals with severe haemophilia.重度血友病患者一级预防与按需治疗的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(11):759-74. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220110-00005.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of late prophylaxis vs. on-demand treatment for severe haemophilia A in Italy.意大利重度甲型血友病延迟预防与按需治疗的成本效益分析。
Haemophilia. 2017 May;23(3):422-429. doi: 10.1111/hae.13185. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
4
Cost-utility analysis of life-long prophylaxis with recombinant factor VIIIFc vs recombinant factor VIII for the management of severe hemophilia A in Sweden.瑞典使用重组因子VIIIFc与重组因子VIII进行终生预防治疗重度甲型血友病的成本效用分析。
J Med Econ. 2018 Apr;21(4):318-325. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1405816. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
5
Cost-utility analysis of Canadian tailored prophylaxis, primary prophylaxis and on-demand therapy in young children with severe haemophilia A.加拿大针对重度甲型血友病幼儿的定制预防、初级预防和按需治疗的成本效用分析。
Haemophilia. 2008 Jul;14(4):743-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01664.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
6
Revisiting the cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with clotting factor for the treatment of severe haemophilia A.重新评估凝血因子预防治疗重度 A 型血友病的成本效益。
Haemophilia. 2009 Jul;15(4):881-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2009.02019.x. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
7
Cost effectiveness of haemophilia treatment: a cross-national assessment.血友病治疗的成本效益:一项跨国评估。
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2005 Oct;16(7):477-85. doi: 10.1097/01.mbc.0000178830.39526.ff.
8
Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. A cost-utility analysis.延长依诺肝素治疗以预防初次髋关节或膝关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞。一项成本效益分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Oct;124(8):507-17. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0720-3. Epub 2004 Sep 10.
9
COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY PROPHYLAXIS, COMPARED WITH ON-DEMAND TREATMENT, FOR PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HEMOPHILIA TYPE A IN COLOMBIA.哥伦比亚重度甲型血友病患者初级预防与按需治疗的成本效用分析
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(5):337-347. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000544. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
10
Haemophilia A: pharmacoeconomic review of prophylaxis treatment versus on-demand.甲型血友病:预防治疗与按需治疗的药物经济学综述
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:596164. doi: 10.1155/2015/596164. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Modelling Approaches in Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inherited Bleeding Disorders.遗传性出血性疾病治疗经济评估中建模方法的系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Aug 31. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00996-3.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Recombinant Factor IX Fc Prophylaxis and Recombinant Factor IX On-Demand Treatment in Patients with Haemophilia B Without Inhibitors.B 型血友病无抑制剂患者使用重组凝血因子 IX Fc 预防治疗和按需治疗的成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jun;41(6):2307-2323. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02841-w. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Etranacogene Dezaparvovec Versus Extended Half-Life Prophylaxis for Moderate-to-Severe Haemophilia B in Germany.
在德国,艾曲泊帕乙醇胺与延长半衰期预防方案治疗中重度B型血友病的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 May;8(3):373-387. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00480-z. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
4
Are We Capturing the Socioeconomic Burden of Rare Genetic Disease? A Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations and Cost-of-Illness Studies.是否捕捉到罕见遗传病的社会经济负担?经济性评估和疾病成本研究的范围综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Dec;41(12):1563-1588. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01308-0. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
5
The experiences of people with haemophilia and their families of gene therapy in a clinical trial setting: regaining control, the Exigency study.临床试验环境下接受基因治疗的血友病患者及其家庭的体验:重获控制,Exigency 研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Apr 4;17(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02256-2.
6
Model of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Emicizumab Prophylaxis Treatment for Persons with Hemophilia A.血友病 A 患者依米珠单抗预防治疗的短期和长期结局模型。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Sep;26(9):1109-1120. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19406. Epub 2020 May 26.
7
Cost-utility analysis of factor VIII diet therapies prepared using blood plasma vs. recombinant technique for patients with hemophilia A.采用血浆制备和重组技术的因子 VIII 饮食疗法治疗血友病 A 患者的成本-效用分析。
Daru. 2020 Jun;28(1):287-293. doi: 10.1007/s40199-020-00347-8. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
Adenovirus-associated antibodies in UK cohort of hemophilia patients: A seroprevalence study of the presence of adenovirus-associated virus vector-serotypes AAV5 and AAV8 neutralizing activity and antibodies in patients with hemophilia A.英国血友病患者队列中的腺病毒相关抗体:一项关于血友病A患者中腺病毒相关病毒载体血清型AAV5和AAV8中和活性及抗体存在情况的血清流行率研究。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2019 Jan 25;3(2):261-267. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12177. eCollection 2019 Apr.
9
Gene therapy in hemophilia A: a cost-effectiveness analysis.血友病 A 的基因治疗:成本效益分析。
Blood Adv. 2018 Jul 24;2(14):1792-1798. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018021345.
10
Hemophilia Burden of Disease: A Systematic Review of the Cost-Utility Literature for Hemophilia.血友病疾病负担:血友病成本效益文献的系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):632-642. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.632.