Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Dec;41(12):1563-1588. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01308-0. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
Rare diseases have a significant impact on patients, families, the health system, and society. Measuring the socioeconomic burden is crucial to valuing interventions for rare diseases. Healthcare system costs are significant, but so are costs to other government sectors, patients, families, and society. To understand the breadth of costs captured in rare disease studies, we examined the cost categories and elements of socioeconomic burden captured in published studies.
A scoping review was conducted using five electronic databases to identify English language economic evaluations and cost-of-illness studies of interventions for rare diseases (2011-21). We mapped costs using a previously developed evidence-informed framework of socioeconomic burden costs for rare disease.
Of 4890 studies identified, 48 economic evaluations and 22 cost-of-illness studies were included. While 18/22 cost-of-illness studies utilized a societal perspective, only 7/48 economic evaluations incorporated societal costs. Most reported cost categories related to medical costs, with medication and hospitalizations being the most common elements for both study designs. Costs borne by patients, families, and society were reported less among economic evaluations than cost-of-illness studies. These included: productivity (10% vs 77%), travel/accommodation (6% vs 68%), government benefits (4% vs 18%), and family impacts (0% vs 50%).
Contrary to cost-of-illness analyses, most of the included economic evaluations did not account for the hidden burden of rare diseases, that is, costs borne by patients, families, and societies. Including these types of costs in future studies would provide a more comprehensive picture of the burden of disease, providing empirical data to inform how we value and make decisions regarding rare disease interventions, health policy, and resource allocation.
罕见病对患者、家庭、医疗体系和社会都有着重大影响。衡量社会经济负担对于评估罕见病干预措施至关重要。医疗体系的成本固然巨大,但其他政府部门、患者、家庭和社会所承担的成本也不容忽视。为了全面了解罕见病研究中涵盖的成本类型,我们考察了已发表研究中罕见病干预措施的社会经济负担成本类别和要素。
我们采用了五项电子数据库进行了范围界定式综述,以确定罕见病干预措施的英文经济学评价和疾病成本研究。我们利用之前开发的罕见病社会经济负担成本的循证框架,对成本进行了映射。
在 4890 项研究中,有 48 项经济学评价和 22 项疾病成本研究符合纳入标准。虽然 22 项疾病成本研究中有 18 项采用了全人群视角,但只有 7 项经济学评价纳入了全人群成本。大多数报告的成本类别与医疗费用相关,药物和住院治疗是这两种研究设计中最常见的要素。经济学评价报告的患者、家庭和社会承担的成本明显少于疾病成本研究,包括:生产力损失(10%比 77%)、旅行/住宿(6%比 68%)、政府福利(4%比 18%)和家庭影响(0%比 50%)。
与疾病成本分析相反,大多数纳入的经济学评价没有考虑罕见病的隐性负担,即患者、家庭和社会承担的成本。在未来的研究中纳入这些类型的成本,可以更全面地了解疾病负担,为如何评估和决策罕见病干预措施、卫生政策和资源配置提供经验数据。