• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施产科分诊 acuity 量表:评分者间信度和患者流程分析。

Implementing an obstetric triage acuity scale: interrater reliability and patient flow analysis.

机构信息

London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.031. Epub 2013 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.031
PMID:23535239
Abstract

A 5-category Obstetric Triage Acuity Scale (OTAS) was developed with a comprehensive set of obstetrical determinants. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to test the interrater reliability of OTAS and (2) to determine the distribution of patient acuity and flow by OTAS level. To test the interrater reliability, 110 triage charts were used to generate vignettes and the consistency of the OTAS level assigned by 8 triage nurses was measured. OTAS performed with substantial (Kappa, 0.61 - 0.77, OTAS 1-4) and near perfect correlation (0.87, OTAS 5). To assess patient flow, the times to primary and secondary health care provider assessments and lengths of stay stratified by acuity were abstracted from the patient management system. Two-thirds of triage visits were low acuity (OTAS 4, 5). There was a decrease in length of stay (median [interquartile range], minutes) as acuity decreased from OTAS 1 (120.0 [156.0] minutes) to OTAS 3 (75.0 [120.8]). The major contributor to length of stay was time to secondary health care provider assessment and this did not change with acuity. The percentage of patients admitted to the antenatal or birthing unit decreased from 80% (OTAS 1) to 12% (OTAS 5). OTAS provides a reliable assessment of acuity and its implementation has allowed for triaging of obstetric patients based on acuity, and a more in-depth assessment of the patient flow. By standardizing assessment, OTAS allows for opportunities to improve performance and make comparisons of patient care and flow across organizations.

摘要

一个 5 级产科分诊 acuity 量表(OTAS)是用一套全面的产科决定因素开发的。本研究的目的如下:(1)检验 OTAS 的组内一致性;(2)通过 OTAS 水平确定患者 acuity 和流程的分布。为了检验组内一致性,使用 110 份分诊图表生成 vignettes,并测量 8 名分诊护士分配的 OTAS 水平的一致性。OTAS 表现出显著的(Kappa,0.61-0.77,OTAS 1-4)和近乎完美的相关性(0.87,OTAS 5)。为了评估患者流程,从患者管理系统中提取了按 acuity 分层的初级和二级医疗保健提供者评估时间和停留时间。三分之二的分诊就诊为低 acuity(OTAS 4、5)。随着 acuity 从 OTAS 1(120.0 [156.0] 分钟)下降到 OTAS 3(75.0 [120.8] 分钟),停留时间(中位数[四分位数范围],分钟)缩短。停留时间的主要贡献者是二级医疗保健提供者评估时间,这与 acuity 无关。入院到产前或分娩单位的患者比例从 80%(OTAS 1)下降到 12%(OTAS 5)。OTAS 对 acuity 进行了可靠的评估,其实施允许根据 acuity 对产科患者进行分诊,并对患者流程进行更深入的评估。通过标准化评估,OTAS 为提高绩效提供了机会,并为跨组织的患者护理和流程比较提供了机会。

相似文献

1
Implementing an obstetric triage acuity scale: interrater reliability and patient flow analysis.实施产科分诊 acuity 量表:评分者间信度和患者流程分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.031. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
2
Acuity Assessment in Obstetrical Triage.产科分诊中的 acuity 评估 。 (注:这里“acuity”结合语境可能是指病情危急程度等相关概念,在医学领域有特定含义,准确翻译需结合更多上下文确定更精准表述,但仅按要求逐字翻译如此)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Feb;38(2):125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.010. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
3
The Impact of Standardized Acuity Assessment and a Fast-Track on Length of Stay in Obstetric Triage: A Quality Improvement Study.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Oct/Dec;34(4):310-318. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000193.
4
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.
5
The development of an obstetric triage acuity tool.产科分诊 acuity 工具的开发。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2011 Sep-Oct;36(5):290-6. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e318226609c.
6
The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a prospective multicenter evaluation.加拿大儿童分诊与 acuity 量表:一项前瞻性多中心评估。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):71-7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
7
Obstetric and fetal triage.产科和胎儿分诊。
Semin Perinatol. 2020 Jun;44(4):151240. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2020.151240. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
8
A systems analysis of obstetric triage.产科分诊的系统分析
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2007 Oct-Dec;21(4):315-22. doi: 10.1097/01.JPN.0000299789.47161.8a.
9
An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system.哥德堡产科分诊系统的信度研究——一种新的产科分诊系统。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 2;21(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04136-2.
10
Improving satisfaction with care and reducing length of stay in an obstetric triage unit using a nurse-midwife-managed model of care.采用助产士主导的护理模式提高产科分诊单元护理满意度并缩短住院时间。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;58(2):175-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00239.x. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating obstetric triage systems, what are we really measuring - A modified Delphi process introducing outcome measures for obstetric emergency triage systems.验证产科分诊系统,我们究竟在衡量什么——一种改进的德尔菲法,引入产科急诊分诊系统的结果指标。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07476-5.
2
Implementation, effectiveness, and barriers of obstetric triage in reducing waiting time: a scoping review.产科分诊在减少等待时间方面的实施、效果及障碍:一项范围综述
Reprod Health. 2025 Mar 21;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-01982-7.
3
Quality improvement initiative: improving obstetric triaging practices in a rural maternal hospital in central India.
质量改进倡议:改善印度中部农村产妇医院的产科分诊实践。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 7;13(Suppl 1):e001870. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001870.
4
The design of an Obstetric Telephone Triage Guideline (OTTG): a mixed method study.产科电话分诊指南(OTTG)设计:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03076-1.
5
Improving emergency care through a dedicated redesigned obstetrics and gynecology emergency unit at the Women's Hospital, Doha, Qatar.通过卡塔尔多哈妇女医院专门重新设计的妇产科急诊室改善急诊护理。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Feb 13;2(2):100053. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100053. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Obstetric triage improvement process using the Donabedian model of quality care: a quality improvement initiative.利用 Donabedian 质量护理模式改进产科分诊流程:一项质量改进举措。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 May;11(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001483.
7
Improving assessment of acute obstetric patients - introducing a Swedish obstetric triage system.改善急性产科患者评估——引入瑞典产科分诊系统。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):1207. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07210-9.
8
An interrater reliability study on the Gothenburg obstetric triage system- a new obstetric triage system.哥德堡产科分诊系统的信度研究——一种新的产科分诊系统。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 2;21(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04136-2.
9
Reliability of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage.荷兰产科电话分诊的可靠性
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Aug 7;14:3247-3254. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S319564. eCollection 2021.
10
Insights into the design, development and implementation of a novel digital health tool for skilled birth attendants to support quality maternity care in Kenya.深入了解一款为熟练接生员设计、开发和实施的新型数字健康工具,以支持肯尼亚的优质孕产妇护理。
Fam Med Community Health. 2021 Aug;9(3). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000845.