Lindroos Linnéa, Ernstad Erica, Sengpiel Verena
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Diagnosvägen 14, 416 85, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07476-5.
Obstetric emergency triage is more complex than general emergency triage, since the pregnant woman, the fetus and labour status all must be assessed. It is a relatively new branch of triage and is not an integrated part of obstetric emergency care in Sweden. As in general emergency triage, there is no definition of true acuity for obstetric emergency patients. This makes validation of triage systems difficult and results in unclear capacity to identify patients requiring urgent attention. Predominately applied surrogate outcome measures do not reflect acuity at the time of triage and are often affected by organisational factors. The study aims to develop a set of weighted surrogate outcome measures representing acuity at the time of triage, enabling construct validation of obstetric triage systems.
A four-round modified Delphi process was performed at a single tertiary obstetrics department. Seven obstetricians and three midwives participated in round 1, while only obstetricians participated in rounds 2-4 based on the profession's competence. The consensus level for rounds 2-4 was predefined at 100%.
A set of 31 immediate obstetrician-initiated interventions at the emergency department, for a patient presenting with an urgent condition, were defined. The interventions reflect acuity level at the time of triage and with minimum interference or influence by context. The outcomes were weighted at three levels, stratifying urgency in the most severe presentations of these conditions.
As true acuity in a patient seeking emergency care has not been defined, outcome measures reflecting true acuity at the time of triage should be applied when validating triage systems. Previous studies on validity in obstetric triage systems are scarce and inconclusive regarding internal and external validity. The outcome measures developed in this study may serve as a template for validating obstetric triage systems implemented in similar contexts.
产科急诊分诊比一般急诊分诊更为复杂,因为必须对孕妇、胎儿和分娩状态进行评估。这是分诊领域中一个相对较新的分支,在瑞典并非产科急诊护理的一个组成部分。与一般急诊分诊一样,对于产科急诊患者没有真正的 acuity(紧急程度)定义。这使得分诊系统的验证变得困难,导致识别需要紧急关注患者的能力不明确。主要应用的替代结局指标不能反映分诊时的紧急程度,且常受组织因素影响。本研究旨在制定一套代表分诊时紧急程度的加权替代结局指标,以便对产科分诊系统进行结构验证。
在一家三级产科科室进行了四轮改良德尔菲法。7名产科医生和3名助产士参与了第1轮,而基于专业能力,只有产科医生参与了第2 - 4轮。第2 - 4轮的共识水平预先设定为100%。
针对出现紧急情况的患者,定义了一组31项在急诊科由产科医生立即启动的干预措施。这些干预措施反映了分诊时的紧急程度水平,且受背景干扰或影响最小。结局在三个层面进行加权,对这些情况最严重表现时的紧急程度进行分层。
由于尚未定义寻求急诊护理患者的真正紧急程度,在验证分诊系统时应采用反映分诊时真正紧急程度的结局指标。先前关于产科分诊系统有效性的研究稀缺,在内部和外部有效性方面尚无定论。本研究制定的结局指标可作为验证在类似背景下实施的产科分诊系统的模板。