Suppr超能文献

静脉用尼卡地平与拉贝洛尔在急诊科有靶器官损害迹象或症状的高血压患者中的应用:CLUE 试验的亚组分析。

Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Mar 26;3(3):e002338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002338.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of Food and Drug Administration recommended dosing of nicardipine versus labetalol for the management of hypertensive patients with signs and/or symptoms (S/S) suggestive of end-organ damage (EOD).

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the multicentre prospective, randomised CLUE trial.

SETTING

13 academic emergency departments in the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible patients had two systolic blood pressure (SBP) measures ≥180 mm Hg at least 10 min apart, no contraindications to nicardipine or labetalol and predefined S/S suggestive of EOD on arrival.

INTERVENTIONS

Medications were administered by continuous infusion (nicardipine) or repeat intravenous bolus (labetalol) for a study period of 30 min or until a specified target SBP ±20 mm Hg was achieved.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Percentage of participants achieving a predefined target SBP range (TR) defined as an SBP within ±20 mm Hg as established by the treating physician.

RESULTS

Of the 141 eligible patients, 49.6% received nicardipine, 51.7% were women and 81.6% were black. Mean age was 52.2±13.9 years. Median initial SBP did not differ in the nicardipine (210.5 (IQR 197-226) mm Hg) and labetalol (210 (200-226) mm Hg) groups (p=0.862). Nicardipine patients were more likely to have a history of diabetes (41.4% vs 25.7%, p=0.05) but there were no other historical, demographic or laboratory differences between groups. Within 30 min, nicardipine patients more often reached the target SBP range than those receiving labetalol (91.4% vs 76.1%, difference=15.3% (95% CI 3.5% to 27.3%); p=0.01). On multivariable modelling with adjustment for gender and clinical site, nicardipine patients were more likely to be in TR by 30 min than patients receiving labetalol (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.31 to 10.18, C statistic=0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of hypertension with suspected EOD, patients treated with nicardipine are more likely to reach prespecified SBP targets within 30 min than patients receiving labetalol.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00765648, clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

目的

比较食品和药物管理局推荐剂量的尼卡地平与拉贝洛尔治疗有器官损害迹象和/或症状(S/S)的高血压患者的疗效。

设计

多中心前瞻性随机 CLUE 试验的二次分析。

地点

美国 13 个学术急救部门。

参与者

符合条件的患者有两次收缩压(SBP)测量值≥180mmHg,至少相隔 10 分钟,无尼卡地平或拉贝洛尔禁忌证,且到达时具有预先确定的提示器官损害的 S/S。

干预措施

在研究期间用持续输注(尼卡地平)或重复静脉推注(拉贝洛尔)给予药物,时间为 30 分钟或直至达到指定的目标 SBP±20mmHg。

主要结局测量

达到预定目标 SBP 范围(TR)的参与者比例,定义为治疗医生确定的 SBP 在±20mmHg 内。

结果

在 141 名符合条件的患者中,49.6%接受尼卡地平,51.7%为女性,81.6%为黑人。平均年龄为 52.2±13.9 岁。尼卡地平组(210.5(IQR 197-226)mmHg)和拉贝洛尔组(210(200-226)mmHg)的初始中位 SBP 无差异(p=0.862)。尼卡地平组患者更有可能有糖尿病史(41.4%比 25.7%,p=0.05),但两组之间无其他历史、人口统计学或实验室差异。在 30 分钟内,接受尼卡地平治疗的患者比接受拉贝洛尔治疗的患者更常达到目标 SBP 范围(91.4%比 76.1%,差异=15.3%(95%CI 3.5%至 27.3%);p=0.01)。在调整性别和临床地点的多变量模型中,与接受拉贝洛尔治疗的患者相比,接受尼卡地平治疗的患者在 30 分钟内更有可能达到 TR(OR 3.65,95%CI 1.31 至 10.18,C 统计量=0.72)。

结论

在疑似有器官损害的高血压患者中,与接受拉贝洛尔治疗的患者相比,接受尼卡地平治疗的患者在 30 分钟内达到预设 SBP 目标的可能性更高。

临床试验注册

NCT00765648,clinicaltrials.gov。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44a5/3612758/4d0d2879512e/bmjopen2012002338f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验