Suppr超能文献

远程口腔医学中几种潜在早期龋齿评估方法的比较。

Comparing potential early caries assessment methods for teledentistry.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2013 Mar 28;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optical caries detection has the potential to be incorporated in telehealth medicine for preventive dental screening. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare visible and near infrared detection methods for identifying early non-cavitated ex vivo occlusal demineralization.

METHODS

Six blinded examiners were used to compare the accuracy of the following three examinations in detecting occlusal demineralization: Midwest Caries ID (MID), visual photographic examination (CAM) and Cross Polarization Optical Coherence Tomography (CP-OCT). For each diagnostic method, two examiners assessed the extracted tooth samples 1-2 weeks apart. Teeth were then sectioned and lesion depth was confirmed (n = 42) by a blinded histological examination using a glycol based caries indicator dye. The sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Sp), Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and Area under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUC) were calculated.

RESULTS

For detecting any demineralization versus sound pit and fissure enamel, the mean Sen/Sp found was 46.9/85.0 for MID, 80.5/52.5 for CAM, and 83.4/45.0 for CP-OCT. For detecting non-cavitated demineralization that progressed into the dentin, the mean Sen/Sp found was 17.3/88.0 for MID, 48.0/57.8 for CAM, and 44.2/72.7 for CP-OCT. AUC values were statistically significant (P < 0.05) in three out of four examiner assessments when MID and CP-OCT were used to detect any demineralization. AUC values were significant for a single CAM examination. When assessing deeper non-cavitated lesions, none of the assessment methods were able to yield AUC values that were significantly different than a random 'coin flip' test. When examining reliability, MID demonstrated the highest ICC score (0.83) and CP-OCT had the lowest (0.49).

CONCLUSION

Although MID and CP-OCT were useful in detecting the presence of demineralization, examiners were not able to utilize these devices to adequately assess the depth of the demineralization. This study found that MID and CP-OCT did not have markedly superior diagnostic values from simple CAM assessment for use in teledentistry.

摘要

背景

光学龋病检测有可能被纳入远程医疗医学,用于预防性牙科筛查。本研究的目的是评估和比较可见光和近红外检测方法,以识别早期非龋性窝沟脱矿。

方法

6 名盲法检查者用于比较以下三种检查方法在检测窝沟脱矿方面的准确性:中西部龋病 ID(MID)、视觉摄影检查(CAM)和交叉偏振光相干断层扫描(CP-OCT)。对于每种诊断方法,两名检查者在 1-2 周后对提取的牙齿样本进行评估。然后将牙齿切片,并用基于乙二醇的龋病指示剂染料进行盲法组织学检查以确认病变深度(n = 42)。计算灵敏度(Sen)、特异性(Sp)、组内相关系数(ICC)和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

对于检测任何脱矿与完好的窝沟釉质相比,MID 的平均 Sen/Sp 为 46.9/85.0,CAM 为 80.5/52.5,CP-OCT 为 83.4/45.0。对于检测进展到牙本质的非龋性脱矿,MID 的平均 Sen/Sp 为 17.3/88.0,CAM 为 48.0/57.8,CP-OCT 为 44.2/72.7。当使用 MID 和 CP-OCT 检测任何脱矿时,在四项检查中的三项中,AUC 值具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。CAM 单次检查的 AUC 值具有显著性。当评估更深的非龋性病变时,没有一种评估方法的 AUC 值能够显著不同于随机“抛硬币”检验。当检查可靠性时,MID 显示出最高的 ICC 评分(0.83),CP-OCT 最低(0.49)。

结论

虽然 MID 和 CP-OCT 可用于检测脱矿的存在,但检查者无法使用这些设备充分评估脱矿的深度。本研究发现,与简单的 CAM 评估相比,MID 和 CP-OCT 在远程牙科中的诊断价值并没有明显优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/632f/3621098/8d9c0d363098/1472-6831-13-16-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验