Jablonski-Momeni Anahita, Stucke Jasmin, Steinberg Torben, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner Monika
Department of Paediatric and Community Dentistry, Dental School, Philipps University of Marburg, Georg-Voigt Street 3, 35033 Marburg, Germany.
Int J Dent. 2012;2012:371595. doi: 10.1155/2012/371595. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
Aim. To use visual inspection (ICDAS-II), laser fluorescence (LF), fluorescence based camera (FC) and radiographic examination (BW) for detection of caries and for treatment decision. Methods. The occlusal sites of 84 extracted permanent teeth were examined using all methods and treatment decisions (preventive or operative care) were recorded based on each method independently. For validation of the findings, fissures were opened with rotating instruments and clinical depth was determined as gold standard. Correlations (r(s)), sensitivity, specificity and AUC were calculated. McNemar test was used to show whether different methods led to significant changes in treatment decisions. Results. Highest correlation was found between ICDAS-II and FC (r(s) 0.84), ICDAS-II and gold standard (0.82) and FC and gold standard (0.81). ICDAS-II provided the highest performance (AUC 1.0), followed by FC (0.95) and LF (0.88). The greatest difference was found for treatment planning of dentine lesions, where the use of FC (cut-offs according to the literature) had the greatest agreement between operative treatment and dentine lesions, followed by use of ICDAS-II. Conclusion. ICDAS-II may have high potential for detection and treatment planning, and other devices, especially the fluorescence camera, can add substantial information to the visual examination, enabling examiners plan treatment more accurately.
目的。运用视觉检查(国际龋病检测与评估系统第二版,ICDAS-II)、激光荧光法(LF)、荧光相机(FC)及X线检查(BW)来检测龋齿并做出治疗决策。方法。使用所有方法对84颗拔除的恒牙咬合面进行检查,并基于每种方法独立记录治疗决策(预防性或手术治疗)。为验证结果,用旋转器械打开窝沟,将临床深度测定作为金标准。计算相关性(r(s))、敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。采用McNemar检验来显示不同方法是否导致治疗决策的显著变化。结果。ICDAS-II与FC之间的相关性最高(r(s) 0.84),ICDAS-II与金标准之间(0.82)以及FC与金标准之间(0.81)。ICDAS-II表现最佳(AUC 1.0),其次是FC(0.95)和LF(0.88)。在牙本质病变的治疗计划方面差异最大,使用FC(根据文献设定的临界值)时手术治疗与牙本质病变之间的一致性最高,其次是使用ICDAS-II。结论。ICDAS-II在检测和治疗计划方面可能具有很大潜力,其他设备,尤其是荧光相机,可以为视觉检查增添大量信息,使检查者能够更准确地制定治疗计划。