Hultman Charles Scott, Edkins Renee E, Wu Cindy, Calvert Catherine T, Cairns Bruce A
Division of Plastic Surgery, University of North Carolina Health Care System, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-7195, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 May;70(5):521-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827eac5e.
INTRODUCTION: Hypertrophic burn scars produce significant morbidity, including itching, pain, stiffness, and contracture. Best practices for management continue to evolve. Lasers have recently been added to treatment algorithms, but indications and efficacy have not been fully defined. We studied the impact of laser therapies on hypertrophic burn scars. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, before-after study in burn patients with hypertrophic scars. Procedures were performed more than 6 months after burn injury and were repeated monthly. The pulsed-dye laser was used for pruritus and erythema, whereas the fractional CO2 laser was used for stiffness and abnormal texture. All procedures were performed in the OR, with anesthesia. Outcomes are as follows: (1) Vancouver Scar Scale (objective changes in pigmentation, erythema, pliability, height; range, 0-15) and (2) UNC Scar Scale (subjective changes in pain, itching, tingling, stiffness; range, 0-12). Before-after scores were compared by Student t test, with significance assigned to P values of <0.05. RESULTS: During 2011, we treated 147 patients (mean age, 26.9 years; mean TBSA, 16.1%) over 415 sessions (2.8 sessions/patient), including pulsed dye laser (n = 327) and CO2 (n = 139), mean surface area of 83 cm. Etiology included flame (75), scald (37), and other (35). Treatments occurred 16 months (median) and 48 months (mean) after burn injury. Vancouver Scar Scale decreased from 10.4 (SD, 2.4) to 5.2 (1.9) (P < 0.0001). UNC Scar Scale decreased from 5.4 (2.5) to 2.1 (1.7) (P < 0.0001). Mean length of follow-up was 4.7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Laser therapies significantly improve both the signs and symptoms of hypertrophic burn scars, as measured by objective and subjective instruments.
引言:肥厚性烧伤瘢痕会导致严重的并发症,包括瘙痒、疼痛、僵硬和挛缩。最佳治疗方法仍在不断发展。激光最近已被纳入治疗方案,但适应症和疗效尚未完全明确。我们研究了激光疗法对肥厚性烧伤瘢痕的影响。 方法:我们对烧伤后出现肥厚性瘢痕的患者进行了一项前瞻性前后对照研究。手术在烧伤后6个月以上进行,每月重复一次。脉冲染料激光用于治疗瘙痒和红斑,而剥脱性二氧化碳激光用于治疗僵硬和质地异常。所有手术均在手术室进行,并采用麻醉。结果如下:(1)温哥华瘢痕量表(色素沉着、红斑、柔韧性、高度的客观变化;范围为0 - 15)和(2)北卡罗来纳大学瘢痕量表(疼痛、瘙痒、刺痛、僵硬的主观变化;范围为0 - 12)。前后评分采用Student t检验进行比较,P值<0.05具有统计学意义。 结果:2011年期间,我们对147例患者(平均年龄26.9岁;平均烧伤总面积16.1%)进行了415次治疗(每位患者平均2.8次),包括脉冲染料激光治疗(n = 327)和二氧化碳激光治疗(n = 139),平均治疗面积为83平方厘米。病因包括火焰烧伤(75例)、烫伤(37例)和其他(35例)。治疗在烧伤后16个月(中位数)和48个月(平均值)进行。温哥华瘢痕量表评分从10.4(标准差2.4)降至5.2(1.9)(P < 0.0001)。北卡罗来纳大学瘢痕量表评分从5.4(2.5)降至2.1(1.7)(P < 0.0001)。平均随访时间为4.7个月。 结论:通过客观和主观评估工具测量,激光疗法能显著改善肥厚性烧伤瘢痕的体征和症状。
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018-9-20
Lasers Surg Med. 2014-10
Ann Plast Surg. 2013-5
J Burn Care Res. 2019-6-21
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025-3-21
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-6-5
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024-1-19
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-6