Xie W G, Lei F, Wang J, Xu J, Ruan J J, Li Z
Institute of Burns, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University & Wuhan Third Hospital, Wuhan 430060, China.
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 20;34(9):615-623. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.09.011.
To observe the clinical effects of sequential treatments of pulsed dye laser (PDL) and ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser on early stage hypertrophic burn scars. From January 2016 to December 2017, 221 patients with 228 hypertrophic scars in all parts of body within 6 months post healing, conforming to the study criteria and treated in our department, were included in this prospective study. They were first treated by PDL, repeated at an interval of one month until the vascularity score of scar fell below 2 points, and then treated by ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser, repeated at an interval of 3 months. Their start time and numbers of treatment and follow-up time were recorded. Before the first treatment (hereinafter referred to as before treatment) and at the last follow-up (hereinafter referred to as after treatment), the vascularity, thickness, and pliability of scars were scored by a self-made scar rating scale. The scores of patients with the observation time between 6 to18 months post healing were compared among scars of patients grouped by age, body site of scar, starting time of treatment and numbers of treatment. The laser speckle contrast imaging technique was used to measure the blood flow value of scars. The itching symptom of the scars was evaluated by the Verbal Rating Scale. The satisfaction to the final effects of the doctors and patients was investigated and scored separately by Likert scale after treatment. The therapeutic or adverse reactions were recorded during the treatment. Data were processed with paired test, Mann-Whitney test, Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman rank correlation analysis. (1) The patients were treated on (64±36) d post healing, by PDL for (2.5±1.3) times and by ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser for (2.2±1.2) times. The follow-up time was (331±189) d. (2) The vascularity, thickness, pliability scores and total scores of scars were (1.4±0.9), (2.0±0.8), (1.7±0.8), and (5.0±2.1) points respectively after treatment, which were significantly lower than those before treatment [(4.1±0.7), (3.1±0.8), (3.0±0.9), and (10.2±2.0) points respectively, =43.332, 24.968, 28.063, 46.394, <0.01]. (3) Among the 123 scars from 120 patients with observation time between 6 to 18 months post healing, there were no statistically significant differences in the vascularity, thickness, pliability scores and total scores of scars among patients with different ages after treatment ((2)=4.339, 1.826, 1.375, 2.879, >0.05). There was only significant difference in the pliability scores of scars among different body sites ((2)=13.530, <0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the vascularity, thickness, pliability scores and total scores of scars with different starting time of treatment ((2)=30.725, 25.233, 25.119, 35.798, <0.01). There were significantly positive correlation between starting time of treatment and the vascularity, thickness, pliability scores and total scores of scars (=0.492, 0.442, 0.446, 0.532, <0.01). There were statistically significant differences in the vascularity, pliability scores and total scores of scars with different numbers of treatment (=4.883, 4.910, 5.049, <0.05). There were significantly negative correlation between number of treatment and the vascularity, thickness, pliability scores and total scores of scars (=-0.176, -0.131, -0.191, -0.201, <0.05). (4) The blood flow values were determined in 18 scars of 18 patients. The results showed that the blood flow values of scars after treatment were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment (=7.230, <0.01). (5) The pruritus scores of scars of patients after treatment were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment (=12.818, <0.01). (6) There were significant differences between the satisfaction scores of doctors and the scores of patients after treatment (=12.130, <0.01). (7) After PDL treatment, there were some edema and purpura reactions for all the patients, and 11 (5.0%) patients had blisters. After ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment, 4 (1.8%) patients had blisters, 5 (2.3%) patients suffered inflammatory reaction and erosion, and 9 (4.1%) patients suffered pigmentation. The scores of hypertrophic burn scars can be obviously improved by sequential treatments of PDL and ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser. The effects can be more obvious with the earlier starting time and more numbers of treatment. The laser treatments can also decrease the blood flow values and alleviate the pruritus of scars, with high satisfaction of both patients and doctors.
观察脉冲染料激光(PDL)与非剥脱性分次二氧化碳激光序贯治疗早期增生性烧伤瘢痕的临床效果。2016年1月至2017年12月,选取在本科治疗的符合研究标准的221例患者,共228处愈合后6个月内全身各部位的增生性瘢痕纳入本前瞻性研究。先采用PDL治疗,每月重复1次,直至瘢痕血管评分降至2分以下,然后采用非剥脱性分次二氧化碳激光治疗,每3个月重复1次。记录其开始治疗时间、治疗次数及随访时间。在首次治疗前(以下简称治疗前)及末次随访时(以下简称治疗后),采用自制瘢痕评分量表对瘢痕的血管情况、厚度及柔韧性进行评分。比较愈合后6至18个月观察期患者的瘢痕,按年龄、瘢痕部位、治疗开始时间及治疗次数分组。采用激光散斑对比成像技术测量瘢痕的血流值。采用视觉模拟评分法评估瘢痕的瘙痒症状。治疗后采用Likert量表分别对医生和患者对最终疗效的满意度进行调查评分。记录治疗期间的治疗反应或不良反应。数据采用配对t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Wilcoxon符号秩和检验、Kruskal-Wallis H检验及Spearman秩相关分析。(1)患者愈合后(64±36)d开始治疗,接受PDL治疗(2.5±1.3)次,接受非剥脱性分次二氧化碳激光治疗(2.2±1.2)次。随访时间为(331±189)d。(2)治疗后瘢痕的血管、厚度、柔韧性评分及总分分别为(1.4±0.9)、(2.0±0.8)、(1.7±0.8)及(5.0±2.1)分,均显著低于治疗前[分别为(4.1±0.7)、(3.1±0.