Kim Tae Kyun, Chang Chong Bum, Koh In Jun
Joint Reconstruction Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumiro, Bundanggu, Seongnamsi, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, Republic of Korea,
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1849-58. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2487-y. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
This systematic review was undertaken to answer three specific questions relating to the clinical values of tranexamic acid (TNA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA): (1) Whether there are differences in blood-saving effects between the systemic and topical administrations; (2) Whether blood-saving effects of TNA differ by doses and timings of administration; and (3) Whether the use of TNA is safe at all reported doses, timings, and routes of administration with respect to the incidences of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).
A systematic review was carried out with 28 randomised controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TNA use in TKA identified from the literature.
Both systemic and topical administrations reduced blood loss after TKA, but transfusion reducing effects varied in studies whether systemic or topical administrations. The effects of TNA were influenced by doses and timings of administration. No increased incidences of symptomatic DVT and PE were found for all reported doses, timings, and routes of TNA administration.
Surgeons can consider incorporating the use of TNA to their blood-saving protocols in TKA without serious concern of adverse events but need to adopt optimal doses, timings, and routes of TNA administrations.
进行本系统评价以回答与氨甲环酸(TNA)在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的临床价值相关的三个具体问题:(1)全身给药和局部给药在节省血液方面是否存在差异;(2)TNA的节省血液效果是否因给药剂量和时间不同而有所差异;(3)就有症状的深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)的发生率而言,在所有报道的剂量、时间和给药途径下使用TNA是否安全。
进行了一项系统评价,纳入28项随机对照试验,以评估从文献中确定的TNA在TKA中使用的有效性和安全性。
全身给药和局部给药均减少了TKA后的失血,但无论是全身给药还是局部给药,不同研究中减少输血的效果各不相同。TNA的效果受给药剂量和时间的影响。在所有报道的TNA给药剂量、时间和途径下,均未发现有症状的DVT和PE发生率增加。
外科医生可以考虑在TKA的血液节省方案中加入TNA的使用,而无需严重担心不良事件,但需要采用TNA给药的最佳剂量、时间和途径。