Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thammasat University, 99 Moo 18 Phaholyothin Rd, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Kasetsart University Laboratory School Center for Educational Research and Development, 50 Ngamwongwan Rd, Chatuchak, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jun;144(6):2753-2759. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05337-y. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) administration is supported by numerous evidence in reducing blood loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The combination of intravenous (IV) and intra-articular (IA) TXA administration revealed good result in blood loss reduction with less evidence of venous thromboembolism event (VTE). Several literature reviews portray that peri-articular (PA) administration yields similar hemostasis in comparison to IV route. However, there is no report on the clinical effect of combining PA + IA TXA in blood loss reduction and its complications, compared to combining IV + IA TXA after TKA.
We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the use of PA + IA TXA administration and IV + IA TXA administration in 70 patients who were scheduled for unilateral primary TKA. Thirty-five patients were assigned for PA + IA injection (Group 1) and anoter 35 patients were assigned for IV + IA injection (Group 2). Primary outcomes included total blood loss at 48 h, and the need for blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes included thigh and leg circumference, degree of knee flexion, and postoperative complications.
The calculated blood loss at 48 h showed no difference between Groups 1 and 2 (617 ml vs. 632 ml, p = 0.425). The total hemoglobin and hematocrit changes were not different (1.89 g/dL vs. 1.97 g/dL, p = 0.371 and 5.66% vs. 5.87%, p = 0.391). There was no need for blood transfusion in either group. However, lower thigh swelling was significant in Group 1 (2.15 cm vs. 2.79 cm, p = 0.04). Leg circumferences at 48 h was also lower in Group 1 (42.12 cm vs. 42.77 cm, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in knee flexion decrease between the two groups (38° vs. 37°, p = 0.425). There were no VTE complications or infections found in either group.
Combined PA + IA TXA administration had similar efficacy in blood loss reduction and blood transfusion when compared to combined IV + IA TXA. The first group displayed less soft tissue swelling. The combination of PA + IA TXA administration can be used as an alternative regimen to avoid IV TXA administration.
氨甲环酸(TXA)的应用在全膝关节置换术后(TKA)减少失血方面得到了大量证据的支持。静脉(IV)和关节内(IA)TXA 联合应用在减少失血方面显示出良好的效果,静脉血栓栓塞事件(VTE)的证据较少。几项文献综述表明,关节周围(PA)给药在止血方面与 IV 途径相似。然而,目前还没有关于 TKA 后,PA+IA TXA 联合用药与 IV+IA TXA 联合用药在减少失血和并发症方面的临床效果的报道。
我们进行了一项双盲、随机对照试验,比较了 70 例单侧初次 TKA 患者使用 PA+IA TXA 给药和 IV+IA TXA 给药的效果。35 例患者被分配接受 PA+IA 注射(第 1 组),另 35 例患者被分配接受 IV+IA 注射(第 2 组)。主要结局包括 48 小时内总失血量和输血需求。次要结局包括大腿和小腿围度、膝关节屈曲程度和术后并发症。
第 1 组和第 2 组 48 小时内的计算失血量无差异(617ml vs. 632ml,p=0.425)。总血红蛋白和血细胞比容的变化无差异(1.89g/dL vs. 1.97g/dL,p=0.371;5.66% vs. 5.87%,p=0.391)。两组均无需输血。然而,第 1 组的大腿肿胀程度显著较低(2.15cm vs. 2.79cm,p=0.04)。第 1 组 48 小时的小腿围度也较低(42.12cm vs. 42.77cm,p=0.04)。两组膝关节屈曲减少的程度无显著差异(38° vs. 37°,p=0.425)。两组均未发现 VTE 并发症或感染。
与 IV+IA TXA 联合应用相比,PA+IA TXA 联合应用在减少失血和输血方面具有相似的疗效。第 1 组软组织肿胀程度较低。PA+IA TXA 联合给药可作为避免 IV TXA 给药的替代方案。